Jump to content

Doc Daneeka

Full Members
  • Posts

    3671
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Doc Daneeka

  1. JFC, that stupid is so concentrated he needs to be careful he doesn’t start nuclear fusion.
  2. I tried UHF on my iPad. It shows playback errors. It will hit five of those before it gives up, so at least that’s something to go on. I’ll try it with the VPN. May just try another provider if I can find a better option. Thanks.
  3. I didn’t wish for injury. I wished for the QB to be knocked on his ass.
  4. IPTV Question: Ok, I have reasonable tech knowledge but this is my first foray into this. Every channel I view freezes after 45-50 seconds. Yes, I used a stopwatch. Foreign, domestic, movie, tv, live, recorded, it doesn’t matter. Internet is 500Mb fiber up and down and it tests at over 600. I stream constantly and have never had an issue. It’s borderline inconceivable (yes, I know what the word means) that Internet is the issue. I’m using a first gen 4K AppleTV hardwired into a bridge. The connection tests fine and it’s never had any issues streaming. I’m using IPTV Smarters on the AppleTV because that’s what was included in the provider’s instructions, but I’m not married to it. I’m using a low rent Samsung 4K TV, which seems unlikely to be the issue. I’m using novawavetv.com as the provider and whatever random-ass link they included in the setup instructions. I tend to think the issue is the provider, but it’s hard to imagine it’s a global issue unless they’re just a complete scam (which I don’t rule out), so I’m not sure. Is there anything I can try short of contacting their tech support? Am I missing something that should be obvious? Theoretically, I can throw an IPTV app on my TV and eliminate the AppleTV and its app as the issue and that’s probably what I’ll do in the meantime, but part of me wonders if the TV will be responsive enough. I’d think even an old AppleTV has more processing power but I’ve been wrong before. Anyway, thanks for any insight or tips.
  5. That’s rac… oh. I see. Never mind.
  6. Does “this type of injury” have different levels of severity? If so, what relevant data do you have on the severity of this one? Hell, he may never play again, but I don’t think the doomsayers have any more insight than the sunshine brigade without knowing more specifics about the particular injury in question.
  7. It doesn’t speak to that at all.
  8. Well, given that my original argument is that the upgrade was in depth and not absolute peak, I’m sticking with my argument that the room, overall, that I’d take is the 2024 room. Other people may see it differently. That’s cool.
  9. I mean, sure, there’s always a reason why it’s ok when our side does it and why the other guys are classless douches when they do it.
  10. Worthy is faster than Bond. I don’t know that he’s better in any meaningful way. Mitchell was a badass. Would I trade him for Wingo right now? No. Cook now is better than Cook then. Golden vs. Whittington, as receivers? Hmmm. Based on what I’ve seen and what Sarkisian has said, the blocking needs to step up. That said, I wouldn’t swap this year’s group for last year’s.
  11. Maybe, maybe at the margin — Bond probably isn’t going to put up a 40 time like Worthy’s — but he’s more than fast enough to do to defenses what Worthy did. Imo.
  12. Where does throwing to Cook up 42-7 in the 4th fall on the class scale? To be clear, I’m not opposed and I understand why, but not everyone sees it that way. There are plenty of people who saw Sarkisian’s continuing to press into the 4th quarter the same way you see what Tennessee did.
  13. He did pretty well against Alabama’s defense in 2023. I think there’s a pretty strong argument to be made that the WR position is upgraded in depth and experience compared to last year. Bond, Wingo, Cook, Golden, Moore, and Bolden doesn’t have a Worthy at the top, maybe, but they come at teams in waves.
  14. He also said “after three games” which is a bit different.
  15. I think Sarkisian is more than able to handle it. I don’t think, “Oh no, their backup might be good enough to take the Heisman favorite’s job,” even if a bad take, creates quite the look they’re hoping for.
  16. If nothing else, the “they’ll take a step back without Worthy, Mitchell, and Sanders” talk has quieted down.
  17. I could have been reading incorrect information, though I don’t think kickers and punters being able to do such things based on predetermined formations is that unusual. Either way, it’s not the kicking team’s responsibility to conform to expectations.
  18. It’s not his job to stop his own team but, as I understand it, this was a call made by the kicker based on formation. Tennessee offered shortened quarters for the second half and Kent State declined. Tip of the hat to Kent State for that.
  19. They just need to win their conference. If they do, they’re in the playoffs. If they don’t, playing OU probably isn’t going to help them.
  20. Imo.
  21. Why should they play OU? “Choices have consequences” works both ways.
  22. If http referer is still a thing, and I feel like it is, it’s a certainty that he reads it.
  23. A glitch in the matrix, maybe.
  24. Well, turnovers aside, you were watching the two best teams in the country. No one will mistake the Aggies and Gators for that.
×
×
  • Create New...