Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, closetojumping said:

“Potentially” means a couple of things depending upon the position. 

1) They’ve done everything they can to not spook Cooper before he arrives on campus. They had to sell the Georgetown guy to him as a non-threat. They’re not going to come out and say “yep, got to get us a top line RB to get that room in order”. Some of you guys have been really dense about the RB room and Cooper this whole cycle. 

 

This explains why they didn’t go after Estrada, the totally superior Minnesota RB commit from El Paso who might be one of the best prospects in the nation. It is the only explanation that makes sense.

  • Haha 7
Posted
2 hours ago, TexasExe14 said:

What does it matter. I don’t even think worthy likes Texas. He says his high school in his intro with the chiefs.

 

2 hours ago, Atticus said:

The same Worthy who was on the sidelines for the A&M game yucking it up?

069c616d-0a21-4e7b-828f-f7d29e202aff_tex

Posted
20 minutes ago, Ricky Butler said:

If I have anything to say about it, he will. 


Both IT and OTF mentioned he is more of a raw athlete and we should not count on him as a day one contributor. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Newy25 said:


Both IT and OTF mentioned he is more of a raw athlete and we should not count on him as a day one contributor. 

Are we expecting Baxter to eat up a good number of carries? Even if we get a top flight RB in the portal seems like we could still be thin if Wisner leaves. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...