Jump to content

TwiceHorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    41627
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by TwiceHorn

  1. It is true that a lot of the above is just opinion. Horrible opinion, but opinion nonetheless. Still, he's barfed out a considerable amount of propaganda, and that bit about trans and machines is weird, very weird, and confusing and also a lie.
  2. Does chemical castration have a meaning? Has a minor ever been chemically castrated under the guise of trans treatment? Was the 2020 election stolen?
  3. OwO. Did I do that right?
  4. Then you are poorly informed about right wing politics. He's a fringey dude, but if you are not aware of fringey people, then you're not adequately aware of what's going on in the GOP and behind the scenes.
  5. Most of us were concerned about "which side was to blame" because we knew, not that we could dunk on or be dunked on on a message board, but that elected officials, like Donald Trump, Nancy Mace, Clay Higgins and I'm sure scores of others could ratchet up hateful rhetoric in a public forum where, unlike message boards, it really does matter. Right here on this page is video evidence of the President, of the fucking United States of fucking America, saying, in public, that he doesn't care about right wing violence, but only left wing violence. Do you see why some people might be concerned? Also *bated
  6. Gonna have to disagree with your police work here, Lou, although I get the gist of what you're trying to say. Right here on this thread, there is verbatim evidence of at least three elected representatives of one side, Trump, Mace, and Higgins, being morons (to the extent they aren't actual morons). Edit to add, on this board because the evidence is in the other thread.
  7. The phrase leftist is almost exclusively deployed by Trump aficionados to people like me, who voted mostly GOP for 30+ years. When it was more meaningful, it was applied to actual leftists, like Sandinistas.
  8. And I have stated as much. The tangent of this thread was whether Reagan's "cult" really compares to the Trump "cult." It does not, regardless of similarities they shared, or more accurately how Reagan's actions trace to the environment we find ourselves in today. And the genesis of this tangent was my statement that a lot of MAGAts outright reject the GOP prior to Trump. A lot of Trumpists proudly declare that "I'm not a Republican." That was certainly not the case with Reagan.
  9. Did the poster you quoted say or imply as much?
  10. Incorrect. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. The second statement may be true, but it will not be a murder charge.
  11. As I believe bozo observed, "trying on costumes." He seemed to take the cosplay pretty seriously though. AP.
  12. An Indian dude, and self-professed Hindu, "talking to" an alleged Christian, about a Nordic pagan afterlife. Makes sense.
  13. It's absurd, but yeah they do on the false belief that it doesn't contain caffeine.
  14. Leave. Take your hateful bitter shit out of here.
  15. More facile legal analysis. Second, Justice Souter suggests today’s decision may have important ramifications for academic freedom, at least as a constitutional value. See post, at 12–13. There is some argument that expression related to academic scholarship or classroom instruction implicates additional constitutional interests that are not fully accounted for by this Court’s customary employee-speech jurisprudence. We need not, and for that reason do not, decide whether the analysis we conduct today would apply in the same manner to a case involving speech related to scholarship or teaching.
  16. Yeah, that makes sense. A lot of "incidentals" to give away LDS membership. And it's probably pretty hard to be a nominal Mormon in that part of Utah.
  17. When you say "no religion," I'm assuming you mean nothing overtly "advertised." Or do you mean expressly disclaimed? That is unusual I think in that part of Utah, which is pretty heavily Mormon. But I'm not sure all Mormons "advertise." Especially in a heavily Mormon place.
  18. Maybe some weird bullpup thing in a small caliber, but not a bolt-action rifle if that reporting is accurate.
  19. Um, yeah, most apprehensions of criminals are happy accidents, maybe helped along a bit by dumbassedness on the part of the perp. See Luigi, see this guy. I didn't follow the Kohlberger thing that closely, but wouldn't be surprised if a simple traffic stop led to his arrest.
  20. Nintendo switch. Clearly not the stock of a rifle.
  21. You're making some weird, partially informed legal statements. Sup with that? What does the finder of fact have to do with a legal interpretation of an executive order? Why do you mention Amarillo, in the Northern District of Texas, when eaTme is in the Southern. Other than the presiding judge there? Why mention Tyler and Marshall, when one has a Trump appointee and the other Obama? You seem to suggest if there's a legal cause of action for this and there probably is, that it should be resolved in the most ideological courts in the nation.
  22. Do you even know how your team works? And, as a government institution, is governed by the First Amendment, which has considerably more force than an Executive Order, which has almost no force and in this case is no more than a statement of opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...