Jump to content

Gaffords

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1095
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Gaffords

  1. One more time, D! You got this.
  2. It's gonna be glorious when 'Bama cornholes aggy in a few weeks
  3. A busted coverage that gave up an 81 yard run for a td. A missed field goal that was practically an extra point attempt. Two muggings in the end zone not called, and a blatant facemask missed that would've given us a first and goal inside the 5. This should've been over an hour ago.
  4. We are in their head. This would've gotten ugly if Ewers was able to play.
  5. They are determined to fuck us today.
  6. Lol. Hes a big Texas fan. He insists there is a Longhorn helmet in the background when he does his segments. Who would've thought.
  7. Just as long as we avoid the 2nd half collapse we were great at last year.
  8. That wasn't holding. That was a mugging. About time they call this shit.
  9. Crowd came to work today.
  10. Obviously no such thing as pass interference for 'Bama.
  11. Definitely not the same team with Card at the wheel.
  12. Alabama had the same issue at times last week. Great O-line, but at times left people untouched on the blitz. Hook 'em!
  13. We are going to win!..... ......maybe not tomorrow....
  14. ESPN agrees.... 20 teams with the best shot at making the playoffs. Texas Last year's record: 5-7 Chance to make playoff: 17.4% Chance to win national title: 1.6% Texas A&M Last year's record: 8-4 Chance to make playoff: 2.0% Chance to win national title: 0.1%
  15. What a dumbass. We can win 5 without even showing up. Didn't he see last year?
  16. The Big 12 should've hired me as their Commissioner years ago, and it wouldn't be in this shape now. HaHa A post of mine on the shag 7 years ago, and a sample of the responses... My post was about the time of the AT&T buyout of Direct TV, so there were some lengthy posts responses how the buyout would fix the carrier issues for the PACNET, which led to my own lengthy posts explaining why the buyout wasn't the magic wand most assumed it was. AT&T wasn't coming in to roll over, since they had all the leverage., And Scott was too arrogant to admit his master failure of a plan, needed a lifeline. He'd hadn't budged with the other National carriers, so I didn't see him doing so with his last hope either. Then after more lengthy posts breaking down the numbers if there was a deal struck between AT&T and the PAC, with the PAC getting 100% of what they wanted, even IF AT&T went beyond that and added it to their basic pack required for service, and forced all customers to have it, they would still fall way behind the others, so either way, AT&T wasn't saving them. There are a bunch of posts I made back then, and even further back to when the PAC let Texas, Texas Tech, OU and OSU slip away. But (I think) most of me going on about the PAC going to come unravelled starts around page 935 of the realignment thread, if anyone wants to verify my posts on archived web pages. I pointed out that for the PACNET to get anywhere close to the projected numbers Scott was pushing, it needed the Texas market as a bridge to the east. And not securing it was likely a fatal mistake. One person understood the $ value I pointed out, but no one understood why I thought it went way further than that. The PAC dickweeds really took offense to the notion someone called Scott either an idiot or a con. So I'll admit I had some drunken disagreements. Like this one. Most didn't understand how ESPN torpedoed the PACNET at the time of this post, or why I thought PAC whiffing on UT/OU/TT/OSU meant doom, in more ways than just market money, but a lot of people did figure it out, slowly but surely. ...like this guy most recognize. Granted, it took a couple of years, literally. And my response... Note. I consider PACs miss on UT/OU/TT/OSU a mistake, but a mistake none the less. But the biggest blunder of all realignment was the PAC telling OU/OSU to piss off. That was the golden ticket to undo their fatal mistake... Funny thing about it, Stanford was at the center of either stalling, giving ESPN the time to slide in behind them and slit their throat, and for telling OU to fuck off, without considering we would've followed them before long. The Stanford AD fucked up BIG TIME by not understanding the overall picture and killed the PAC. Just like the BIG 12 Commissioner didn't see the big picture of how far the BIG 12 was going to fall behind the BIG/SEC this new revenue contract would be an issue. The Big 12 schools might be okay with being the 3rd highest paid conference even if it is 6-8-10 million a year less, for the most part. BUT, UT and OU didn't fall in the most part group and were not going to be content with letting the revenue train leave the station without them. Third highest paid conference is not a good thing the big fish I posted this little gem 7 years ago NOTE. I didn't say the B12 and ACC would merge, I said it wouldn't surprise me if they did, because they would lose their workhorses if they didn't do something to protect themselves. B12 lost UT/OU, PAC lost USC/UCLA, and now Clemson/FSU/ect are on the clock. Stay competitive in football, or try to compete with half the others budget.
  17. I assume the ACC has to be putting feelers out. You know they have to be considering expanding to at least shore up against a possible Big or the SEC phone call. Who would the ACC look at? Would they go far west? Or would they look closer to home? On a different note, I heard an interview on Youtube. They were talking about expansion and the Big 12. It might be at this point already, but it definitely is, if the BIG 12 keeps expanding, it opens the door for ESPN to decide not to renew the TV contract, but instead want a completely new contract due to the dynamics of the Big 12 has changed so much. This in effect kills the GOR because it is tied to the existing TV contract, leaving UT and OU free as early as 23 or 24.
  18. We haven't had a decent offensive line since McCoys sophomore year. If you aren't consistently good in the trenches year in and year out, you aren't going to be good very often. Saban is a great coach by any metric. But if he had our rosters and assistant coaches we've had over the past decade +, our record would be slightly better than it was. But that is what makes him good. He built Alabama from ground up, starting with great line play and coaches who could develop players into next level talent.
  19. When has anything ever changed with aggy. They have 100+ years of being the same old aggy in more than football/sports.
  20. I think it's safe to pronounce "The Alliance" is dead. That didn't last long.
  21. This will be fun! They are both going to aggressively poach each other. Let's see. It seems like it was only yesterday Texas was the reason the Big 12 couldn't have it's own network. PAC "Guess what, here is a Chance for some lucky schools to be part of a conference network. It won't ever pay as much as the big/SEC nets, but it's still a few million more than what you are now making off your T3s." B12-2+(1+1{SCRUB})-2-2+4(SRUBS). We still have Jayhawk Basketball. PAC. "We can house 6" Big whatever we are. " We can take 4 or 40 if we go super bIG 12" PAC. " We can join Cali and Texas as home markets and make even more for all from the PACNET". iG. " We can invite the Cali schools and join Texas and Cali too for... got nothing... " PAC. "Goodluck pursuing Stanford or Cal for that matter. Keep us posted on how that goes for ya". The Big 12 schools are manning the office phones 24/7. As soon as that call comes in, those schools will throw up the finger with a " we gone, bitches". Anyone go look at any of their forums to see how the fans feel? I haven't myself.
  22. Sounds about right. Slow down recruiting so that recruiting targets and commits alike get worried no one else is coming and they all bail. aggy mentality at its finest.
  23. That would be funny. That would mean the PAC finally stood up and told Stanford to shut the fuck up and shove their holier than thou up their ass. Stanford has fucked over the PAC more than once when it comes to expansion.
  24. I don't disagree with this, but I think ND is the one who will need to do more leg work over either of those conferences chasing them hot and heavy. ND value to a 18 member conference is less than it would've been to a 10-12-14 member conference. The bigger the conference the less value, outside of a conference that consists of nothing but scrubs.
  25. I wonder if the New Big 12 Commissioner has called the 4 incoming members yet to tell them that there might be a little snag... --"see what happened was...". Unpack your bags bitches, you might be better off where you currently are over the New-New-New-New Big 12 The PAC will come hard and heavy after the BIG 12 and have room for will be coming hard and heavy after 6 B12 members. Who will they be? Does the Big 12 stand firm? This will be fun
×
×
  • Create New...