Jump to content

immamac

Administrators
  • Posts

    20761
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    35

Posts posted by immamac

  1. 2 minutes ago, bejezuz said:

    Sark went from coaching QBs at El Camino College to head coach at Washington in 9 years.  He was 33 when he took that job.  That's a meteoric rise to become a Division 1 coach. They went from going 0-12 the year before he took over to 10 wins the year he left.  That's a good job for a team that has never been a blueblood. 

    USC was a shit show, but he was fired in the middle of his second season because of his drinking, and he's done every reasonable thing a person can do to rehabilitate himself from that.  His track record as a head coach is at best incomplete. 

    I don't know whether he can build a dynasty, but he's a helluva lot better than that asshole we hired from U of H, his offense is miles ahead, and his coaches are much better recruiters.  I don't know what your profession is, but I don't know that I'd want to work for you with a take like that based on the fact that he couldn't turn Washington into Alabama in 5 years after Whittington ran it into the ground.      

    I can guarantee Tom Herman wins more games and goes to a bowl game last year. There is 0 chance that doesn't happen, he uses casey and hudson as battering rams just like he did Sam and his offense isn't terrible. The defense would at worst been just as good, but they knew ash's scheme and it fit the personnel much better. 

    I'm not stanning for Turtle fucking Tom, but he didn't get fired because he was a shitty coach on the field, sure it was frustrating to watch them play games closer than they should have been, but he never lost to fucking Kansas. Not even once. 

    Sark is on a short leash this year - if there isn't immediate and drastic improvement from the get-go (meaning against alabama) then Seven win Steve will be just that...

    • Hook 'Em 3
  2. I think we learn a lot from last year - we are going to suck for the foreseeable future (2 more seasons at least)

    The question really is can the for sure suck that we are going to see be overpowered by explosive plays. Our Defense is going to be trash without something major happening on the DL and LB play this season.

    Texas can pull out a weird win against Alabama, but they won't look equally matched. It will be a battle of bending (and probably breaking) on defense and doing absolutely nothing except explosive plays on offense. 

    I'm not excited about anything in Spring Practice, it's just sark and the hype train from the University, we know what most of the players are capable of and that isn't going to cut it when it comes to being elite outside of some offensive skill positions.

    I will say I'm excited that we finally get to see other TE play. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
  3. Just now, 3adays said:

    Saying RR tornado is on the ground by Dell Diamond and Khalari. If was on the ground from 35/45 all the way to 79 had to have caused massive damage

    KVUE was showing the cam when the tornado hit it. Ripped the camera right off. 

    • Like 1
  4. 5 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

    I tend to agree but I think this one has shown plenty of evidence that he’s not just a normal sack level idiot. I mean the thread he started for debate is now 6 pages and he hasn’t posted. He shit in the pool and is watching everyone swim in it. I personally don’t really care that much because it’s the internet and trolls will always exist. I just don’t see the reason for pretending he isn’t trolling.

    Do you know how much time I don't have to babysit the 500 ways around an IP ban and then weaponizing people to create a whole bunch of accounts? 

    You can just ignore these people and poof, they go away because there is nothing fun for them. Instead we get threads like this manufacturing problems that don't exist if already have solutions. 

    • Hook 'Em 3
  5. 5 minutes ago, Captainant said:

    PAC is obviously trolling with this thread, and is apparent in his general posting pattern. He drive bys hot takes, refuses to actually engage on the issue and examine the sources he relies on, and then leaves the discourse derailed.

    If he's on ignore, he's still derailing threads. You just don't want to take a moderation step and would rather we all ignore the poster covered in shit.

    Unless you don't think what PAC does here in the CR counts as trolling?

    I think you discount how fucking stupid people are. He's not trolling he's just a complete fucking moron who believes crazy shit. 

    Who are all these people who troll constantly that aren't getting banned? I'd love a list. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
  6. 1 minute ago, Beau Vine said:

    That's complete bullshit.  I did not admit to history stalking him, because I absolutely did not history stalk him.  I just negged every new post he made, because he's a fucking troll.  And you lined up behind the troll and supported him.  

    I'm tired of you fucking titty babies crying about internet points. Use the ignore function and stop being such a fucking idiot. 

    • Hook 'Em 4
    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
  7. 1 hour ago, Captainant said:

    Well we can't crowdsource trolls anymore, @immamac will just give them a rep booster because he values discourse or some stupid shit like that.

    This just isn't true. I did that 1 time because someone admitted in a thread to literally history stalking the person which is not what crowdsourcing is there for. It's there for multiple people negging and the situation being automatically handled. Use the ignore function and stop accusing me of stupid shit like this.

    • Hook 'Em 3
    • Like 2
    • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
×
×
  • Create New...