No. Title IX is only about compensation coming from the school, not private funds. The plaintiffs are arguing the $20.5 million House settlement amount from the schools to athletes must be split equally between genders, just like athletic scholarships, otherwise it violates Title IX. It's not settled whether rev share from athletics would have to be treated the same as scholarships under Title IX because this has never happened before, but the current law around Title IX would indicate it probably would be treated the same. However, the Title IX interpretation could always be overturned entirely, or a judge who doesn't like the Title IX rulings could easily find a reason why this should be treated differently than scholarships. My guess is the latter will happen. I'd be very surprised if this case results in requiring equal split of the rev share, but it's certainly a possible outcome.
On top of that, it's pretty much a guarantee that this clearinghouse for NIL contracts will generate lawsuits as soon as they turn down an NIL contract for an athlete. So while the House Settlement has been finalized, it's still all up in the air until the legal challenges that are coming get decided.