Jump to content

Orale

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    751
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Orale

  1. "As far as not saying it yourself, that's true, but part of being part of a groupthink circlejerk is that you don't have to say the untasteful thing out loud yourself, you just stand in allegiance with others who do." As opposed to a one man circle jerk?
  2. What a twat. I'm glad he came to his senses. Don't know what the hell he was thinking in the first place.
  3. I've never called her ugly or a whore. Crazy seems fair.
  4. He's just a miserable person that takes pleasure in making other people miserable.
  5. Wow. You post paragraphs of diatribes without the least bit of evidence and when someone posts an article that clearly and definitively contradicts your lies you demur like a Trumpkin asking for specifics. What a pussy. Well, the article says that 60 women who have worked for Biden never ever saw this type of behavior. Another section says there is no where in the halls of the Senate where this type of brazen behavior could have actually occurred. Another section says she was incompetent and fired for that. Another employer says she was dishonest and a thief. Another section says she held herself out as a high level policy staffer who was responsible for high level policy decisions. She was a mail sorter. Another employer says she was manipulative and abusive. Every woman that worked for Biden says he treated them with the highest respect and put them in positions of power when that was still rare on the Hill. A friend of hers in 2018 says she bragged about how close she was to Biden and what an amazing guy he was. But go ahead and dismiss all this you Russian troll.
  6. Biden has undoubtedly declined. A Joe voter just has to accept that they're voting for an entire administration and trust that he'll have the best and brightest in the key positions who will run the day-to-day government, which I'm confident and satisfied he will.
  7. Since you like to write long responses, why not address the factual issues raised in the article.
  8. That is some pretty damning circumstantial evidence that the assault didn't occur.
  9. There are other instances of him sexually assaulting women? Or are you conflating rubbing shoulders and encroaching personal space with forcefully penetrating women? I don't think any rational person would conflate those behaviors. But you do you.
  10. That's why it would be helpful if the media hounded them mercilessly when this kind of thing happens. I bet judges would become more circumspect about approving these real quick.
  11. Well I guess my issue is with the very first part of your post. You're making really damning conclusions about the guy based on a really presumptuous assumption. Every woman who has ever worked with Biden says they've never seen a hint of this behavior in over 40 years of him serving in the highest offices in this land. Yet you say he's likely a repeat sexual assault offender based on one very questionable accusation. I'm sure you mean well, but I hope you're never on my jury if I'm ever falsely accused of something.
  12. You think it's likely Biden has sexually assaulted many times? Or are you referring to the more benign hair sniffing stuff?
  13. The judge who approved the warrant should be investigated too. Reporters should hang outside his or her office and ask them repeatedly on what basis they approved the warrant. They should ask what percentage of warrants the judge has approved were against people of color or the poor. Do this constantly and the system will change. Or not.
  14. If a tree falls in a forrest...I've got nothing.
  15. Saw them fly a loop around downtown SA. Pretty cool.
  16. Prosecutors frequently overcharge then reduce to a lesser offense during plea bargain. As BE said, a charge does not mean the offense occurred. Overcharging is a serious criminal justice issue that needs to be addressed.
  17. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/12/world/middleeast/nazi-medical-text-israel.html?action=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage I thought this was an interesting story of medicine, history, geo-politics, ethics, and humanity others might enjoy.
  18. I didn't mean you or even her. But it's a common enough sentiment in the online. I think it gets said or is implied so often that the notion becomes normalized which I think is a wrong in itself. But I understand that's not what you're saying.
  19. I hear where you're coming from, but I don't know if I agree with the notion (if I understand you correctly) that voting for the lesser of two "evils" is a cultural problem. It's distasteful to an extent I suppose, but it's also realpolitik. Realpolitik is at its essence pragmatism. Voting pragmatically reflects maturity and wisdom in my mind. That's not to say we shouldn't push for high character pragmatic people like Obama, but I don't think it reflects a cultural infirmity of spirit to vote for someone who's good but not great when the alternative is literally exponentially worse. I'll also say I don't think it's fair for people to characterize Biden as an "evil" choice. He's imperfect and not as innately progressive as I'd like, but I think he is a good and decent man and will surround himself with a diverse and very progressive team that will enact the most progressive agenda America has seen since LBJ.
  20. San Antonio DA is a former defense attorney and a progressive guy in terms of criminal justice reform.
  21. I'm betting it's Kamala. Doesn't put a Senate seat in Republican hands for the first few months of Biden's presidency. Appeals to the critical black constituency. She has issues with her prosecutor past, but I don't think anyone will care. Plus she'll be a good attack dog.
  22. I must live in a bubble because I don't know anyone who thinks Trump is a better option. I asked more in disbelief than in expecting a serious response. Sent from my G5 using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...