Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, hobbes2702 said:

It’s fucking moronic. We had the best olineman in the nation and were a finalist for the Moore award. You’re just pretending that we weren’t an elite offensive line and cherry picking 3 games. 
Name all the olines better than ours last year. Now compare that oline to this one. You’re just dishonest 

I'm asking a simple question of why we couldn't run the football in the 4 most important games we played last year. Michigan rushed for 172 yards on Ohio State right before we played them. Still waiting on an answer. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

It’s fucking moronic. We had the best olineman in the nation and were a finalist for the Moore award. You’re just pretending that we weren’t an elite offensive line and cherry picking 3 games. 
Name all the olines better than ours last year. Now compare that oline to this one. You’re just dishonest 

Because he constantly pretends that the offense last year and the prior year wasn’t extremely talented 

You know how these things work, right? The year prior you are on the watchlist for awards due to expectations. We came from the Big12 to the SEC. Obviously a huge difference in line play, but we were already on the watchlist. The measure of a good line is being able to run the football, right? So why couldn't we run the football against those teams? Why aren't you answering such a simple question? 

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

I'm asking a simple question of why we couldn't run the football in the 4 most important games we played last year. Michigan rushed for 172 yards on Ohio State right before we played them. Still waiting on an answer. 

I gave you one already. Those teams are good. It happens.

How did such a mediocre offensive line manage to produce the best lineman in the nation and finish as one of the three best according to everyone? Dishonest

5 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

You know how these things work, right? The year prior you are on the watchlist for awards due to expectations. We came from the Big12 to the SEC. Obviously a huge difference in line play, but we were already on the watchlist. The measure of a good line is being able to run the football, right? So why couldn't we run the football against those teams? Why aren't you answering such a simple question? 

No that isn’t the measure of a good line unless you’re a simplistic moron with an agenda. I’m sure you’re aware but offensive lines do more than just run block.

Edited by hobbes2702
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

We objectively will never know what Arch would have done with last years offense or what Ewers would have done with this one. Y’all gotta stop doing this every month.

Agreed. But we can clearly see the difference in talent throughout the offense this year vs last.

Posted
1 minute ago, hobbes2702 said:

I gave you one already. Those teams are good. It happens.

How did such a mediocre offensive line manage to produce the best lineman in the nation and finish as one of the three best according to everyone? Dishonest

No that isn’t the measure of a good line unless you’re a simplistic moron with an agenda.

You are basing your evidence on opinion. I am basing my evidence on the CONSISTENT inability to run the football vs quality fronts. That's not dishonest. I would toss in the pass pro breaking down in those same games but you would just blame that on the QB. So we can keep it to running for now. 

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

No one is willing to answer the question? 

first off, someone immediately did answer the question. second, it’s a strawman argument that has nothing to do with the actual discussion vis a vis the talent that quinn ewers had around him vs the talent on this year’s team. quinn had superior talent across the board the last two years vs what Arch is working with this year, and since you know you can’t argue against that fact you’re just creating new arguments about tangential shit instead of just being honest and moving on.

Edited by Derka
Posted
1 minute ago, Thatguy said:

You are basing your evidence on opinion. I am basing my evidence on the CONSISTENT inability to run the football vs quality fronts. That's not dishonest. I would toss in the pass pro breaking down in those same games but you would just blame that on the QB. So we can keep it to running for now. 

Army, Oregon, etc also had multiple bad games where they struggled to establish and effective run game. Did those Olines suck too?

Posted
26 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

Because he constantly pretends that the offense last year and the prior year wasn’t extremely talented 

and he does so with straw man arguments like, “well then how come we didn’t run the ball well in our hardest games?” when the actual discussion is whether nor not last year’s o line was better than this one. or he’ll call matthew golden an nfl flop as “evidence” that matthew golden wasn’t actually all that good in college, as if that isn’t the most disingenuous argument one can make. “charlie ward threw for zero TDs in the nfl, he was bad at football for florida state.” see how dishonest that is?

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Derka said:

first off, someone immediately did answer the question. second, it’s a strawman argument that has nothing to do with the actual discussion vis a vis the talent that quinn ewers had around him vs the talent on this year’s team. quinn had superior talent across the board the last two years, and since you know you can’t argue against that plight you’re creating new arguments about tangential shit instead of *you* just being honest and moving on.

No one has answered the question Derka. The reason we couldn't run the football is because we were extremely weak at the same two positions we are weak at now. C/RG. So we couldn't get a push up the middle vs solid fronts. Because of that Sark switched our base run to Outside Zone. But you can't run sideways against fast fronts. I said that to say this. If we had the same struggles last year running the football vs the Georgia's of the world as we did this year how do you suppose Arch would do anything different than what happened this year with the same exact problem? 

Explain to me how he would magically fix that and have us beating Georgia and Ohio State? 

Edited by Thatguy
Posted

we also went into last year with either our rb3 or rb4 having to be our rb1. we also have sark who loves to abandon the run early for a myriad of reasons. there were also game specific reasons for each of those performances, none of which have anything to do with the fact that the offensive talent from last year’s team was clearly, inarguably superior to that of this year’s team.

Posted (edited)

“can you guys stop doing this?”

one guy came in here and posted “quinn ewers last year was better than arch is today” and then proceeded to clutter these pages full of lies about last year’s team’s talent level plus a bunch of tangential, straw man bullshit to further derail this thread. don’t say “you guys” or “y’all” when there is one specific person who insists on repeatedly bringing quinn ewers into this thread and then invariably following that up with 50 more totally asinine posts all designed to prop up quinn while denigrating everyone else who’s played at Texas in the last 3-4 years.

the world according to ThatGuy:

•all those all americans, award winners, and nfl draft picks:bad at football 

arch manning: worse than the qb who ranked 200th nationally and 13/14 in the sec last year according to PFF 

quinn ewers:

IMG_8049.thumb.jpeg.e3a520fc632fa953460b943dee228f72.jpeg

Edited by Derka
Posted
3 minutes ago, Derka said:

we also went into last year with either our rb3 or rb4 having to be our rb1. we also have sark who loves to abandon the run early for a myriad of reasons. there were also game specific reasons for each of those performances, none of which have anything to do with the fact that the offensive talent from last year’s team was clearly, inarguably superior to that of this year’s team.

How would Arch change anything about why we couldn't run the football? They spied Arch this year and he ran 5 times for 0 yards. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

How would Arch change anything about why we couldn't run the football? They spied Arch this year and he ran 5 times for 0 yards. 

you’re totally right, this year’s o line is better than the one from last year led by kelvin banks and unanimously hailed as a top 3 o line in college football, great argument.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Derka said:

you’re totally right, this year’s o line is better than the one from last year led by kelvin banks and unanimously hailed as a top 3 o line in college football, great argument.

It's not about whether or not YOU or I think it was better. It's about it could not run the football vs good fronts all last year, and therefore wouldn't have offered Arch anything different to win those games vs Georgia twice or Ohio State. Arch still would've been in 3rd and long just like he was this year. Nothing would've changed. That line would've offered the same shit sandwich that this line did. You seeing what I am saying yet?

Posted

The great oline in college football does not exist. Every oline in the country has bad games and good games. College football is so unpredictable great to good to bad is week to week. It’s all about matchups and game plans. That decides if you have a great offensive line that week. Show me the best oline in the country and I’ll watch enough tape to say they suck. Alabama’s oline looks like they are the worst and our oline is miles better. At least this week. 

Posted
24 minutes ago, Derka said:

“can you guys stop doing this?”

one guy came in here and posted “quinn ewers last year was better than arch is today” and then proceeded to clutter these pages full of lies about last year’s team’s talent level plus a bunch of tangential, straw man bullshit to further derail this thread. don’t say “you guys” or “y’all” when there is one specific person who insists on repeatedly bringing quinn ewers into this thread and then invariably following that up with 50 more totally asinine posts all designed to prop up quinn while denigrating everyone else who’s played at Texas in the last 3-4 years.

 

Maybe you've figured it out by now, but I get frustrated with you because periodically you spout wild theories based on zero football logic. 

Every linemen we had last year could've won every award there is to win. It wouldn't change the fact that we couldn't run the football versus quality fronts. When Sark was at Bama he ran Inside Zone? Why? Because you can run more stuff off of it like play action and RPOs. When he got here we tried to run it and the only reason it worked is because Bijan can get his own yards. However, it became pretty clear, especially once we got to the SEC, that we couldn't block worth a shit in the interior. So we changed to being Outside Zone based. Why? Because Outside Zone is the Tai Chi of running philosophies. You don't have to be strong to be good at it. You are just using the defender's momentum against him. 

However, when you play a fast disciplined front, they beat your linemen to all their spots, and that's why we cannot run on Georgia, Ohio State, or even ASU. Oklahoma and Aggy have talent on their fronts but no discipline. They jump around in gaps and end up leaving alleys for a guy like Wisner to take advantage of. 

I asked you why we couldn't run to see what your answer would be. I am surprised you didn't blame the quarterback. 

My irritation with your comment comes because we literally just saw a couple weeks ago what Arch would look like behind a line that couldn't run the football and had a bunch of penalties, and still you claim Arch would've won those games last year when he was literally just facing the same situation two weeks ago and we scored 10 points. Here are the 3rd down yardages Quinn saw in the SEC Championship game. Also 11 penalties for 94 yards. 5 drops too. 

 

3rd and 4
3rd and 9
3rd and 14
3rd and 27
3rd and 14
3rd and 5
3rd and 26
3rd and 5
3rd and 4
3rd and 22
3rd and 15
3rd and 10
3rd and 3
3rd and 17
3rd and 3
3rd and 15
3rd and 5
3rd and 10

 

Only 7 out of 18 times were we in a realistic down and distance. Arch wasn't winning with that. Now back to your regularly scheduled programming. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
17 hours ago, Thatguy said:

Derka, Arch still can't throw basic routes to keep the offense on schedule bro. That's the most important aspect to QBing. Sark has found what he can do well and is doing a solid job of featuring it. 

No, no.  I have been assured that Sark is a stubborn, drunken idiot that won't change anything to fit his players especially since his personal life is out of control.

Posted

OL is a concern mainly guards and center. Another concern is Sark instance on running up the middle. Wisners best runs come from outside zone or stretch runs allowing him to pick the hole as it opens. His best runs last year and this years has come from these run plays. Sark wants to be a smash mouth up the middle run team and play action pass off those runs but he doesn’t have the OL to run that style. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...