Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, LebongJames said:

These takes on Wingo have to be some of the dumbest shit I have read on this site in a while. Is he a perfect WR? No but this team would have been even worse on offense without him. He is a super athlete learning to run routes.

As your primary receiver, that's not great, paired with unreliable hands.  One of the great things about college football is that the stronger players, defenders in this case, often leave after their junior year, which leaves Wingo as an upperclassman next year, against less experienced players he can physically potentially have even more upside on.    

Posted
12 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

Mosley gets separation consistently. Wingo has the speed just needs to polish his routes. You have 3 4/5star freshmen (for now) who can do who knows what. Bishop looks like a demon. Moore sounds gone. We probably go big game hunting for one in the portal but it won’t be at the expense of a good OL or game changer at RB.

Mosley’s best asset as a receiver is he can read coverages and knows where to settle/escape 

4 hours ago, HuttNuts said:

Fucking Belgians

Why do you hate waffles

Posted
1 hour ago, Bevo14 said:

There's no "potentially" about runningback. They better go get one whether or not Wisner stays. 

He's just waiting for the portal entries to give him excuse with team. Everyone knows it's coming.

Posted
2 hours ago, Bevo14 said:

There's no "potentially" about runningback. They better go get one whether or not Wisner stays. 

I think the picture is becoming clear that the staff is trying to decide if they want Wisner to be The Man next year, and Wisner is trying to decide if he wants to stick around without a guarantee of being The Man.

Purely business decisions on both ends, I presume.

Posted

I'm a little surprised to see Sark say that interior DL is a need, especially in such a straightforward way. Next year we'll have Kanu, January, Watson, Lavon Johnson (?), and then Terry/Sharma/Charles from last year's recruiting class. Seems like you could get a 4-man rotation out of that group, unless they're just really down on Watson and Johnson.

Posted
6 minutes ago, tokamak said:

I'm a little surprised to see Sark say that interior DL is a need, especially in such a straightforward way. Next year we'll have Kanu, January, Watson, Lavon Johnson (?), and then Terry/Sharma/Charles from last year's recruiting class. Seems like you could get a 4-man rotation out of that group, unless they're just really down on Watson and Johnson.

Maybe Sark wants another Cole Brevard type that he can line up over the ball? I think Sharma is the only one of the list that fits that mold, and Sark probably wants another one with experience

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Here's my thoughts on our needs. I'm using the excellent Google Sheets roster maintained by @AP101S: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TzoBTIvCXfZIk7Sz3C9txMg0yPvrXyVM/edit?gid=1327300395#gid=1327300395

 

QB: Not a big need. Supposedly Owens is gone. Arch is the starter with Lacey backing him up. I could see going out and getting another Caldwell-type, just for an emergency.

RB: Sark says "potentially". Conventional wisdom says they'll be looking for a potential starter. Expecting this room to clear out quite a bit.

WR: Personally, I could see us passing. We have a lot of numbers here and plenty of needs elsewhere. Latest reporting I've seen is that they'd like to keep the young guys around if they can.

TE: Not a big need, especially if Endries is back. They like the young guys on the roster. Maybe a blocking surface if Shannon moves on.

OT: Starters are set, but how good do they feel about the 3rd option if someone gets injured? Dunno how you bring in a portal option to be your 3rd tackle, though.

IOL: Dear God yes. Dire need. Two guys AT LEAST, please.

DE: Good numbers, and good quality already on the roster. Expensive. I think we're set.

DT: Acknowledged by Sark as a need. Seems like the numbers are OK. Either they must not love Watson or believe the young guys aren't ready yet.

LB: Sark says "potentially". Seems like a need, because you have Lefau, Smith, and then nothing.

CB: Losing Muhammad, but seems like we're in OK shape here with Littleton/Black/Phillips.

S: Depends on a lot of things. Does McDonald return? Is Derek Williams SEC starter quality? Jonah Williams going to focus on baseball? I'm guessing this is why Sark said "potentially".

Posted

DL: We’ve been amazing at high pressure short yardage stops in recent years. A big part of that is the ability to trot a fresh behemoth of 0/1 tech out there for one play of all out maniacal effort. Sounds like Sark will be shopping for another one of them.

RB: Just make the one year investment. Please. It will be worth it.

WR: See RB.

LB/DB: If it’s a good fit, then why not.

IOL: Don’t let perfect get in the way of good. There will be acceptable options looking to play up.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...