Jump to content
crash_davis

Divorcing? How about Trail by Combat?

Recommended Posts

Please dear god, tell me these idiots did not procreate.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/01/14/kansas-man-japanese-swordfight-settle-custody-battle-ex/4464045002/

DES MOINES, Iowa – A Kansas man asked an Iowa court to grant his motion for trial by combat, so he can meet his ex-wife and her attorney "on the field of battle where (he) will rend their souls from their corporal bodies."

David Ostrom, 40, of Paola, Kansas, claims in court documents that his ex-wife, Bridgette Ostrom, 38, "destroyed (him) legally."

He asked the Iowa District Court in Shelby County to give him 12 weeks' "lead time" to source or forge katana and wakizashi swords, according to the Carroll Times Herald

"To this day, trial by combat has never been explicitly banned or restricted as a right in these United States," Ostrom argued in court records, saying it was used "as recently as 1818 in British Court."

Monday, Ostrom told the Des Moines Register he got the idea after learning about a case in 2016 in which New York Supreme Court Justice Philip Minardo acknowledged that duels had not been abolished.

Ostrom said the motion stemmed from his frustrations with his ex-wife's attorney, Matthew Hudson.

"I think I've met Mr. Hudson's absurdity with my own absurdity," he said.

Ostrom said his ex-wife can choose her attorney as a "champion," or stand-in fighter. 

 

 

What if she chooses The Mountain?

Edited by crash_davis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To fuck her in the bush?  Again.

Edited by Lobo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, crash_davis said:

Please dear god, tell me these idiots did not procreate.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/01/14/kansas-man-japanese-swordfight-settle-custody-battle-ex/4464045002/

DES MOINES, Iowa – A Kansas man asked an Iowa court to grant his motion for trial by combat, so he can meet his ex-wife and her attorney "on the field of battle where (he) will rend their souls from their corporal bodies."

David Ostrom, 40, of Paola, Kansas, claims in court documents that his ex-wife, Bridgette Ostrom, 38, "destroyed (him) legally."

He asked the Iowa District Court in Shelby County to give him 12 weeks' "lead time" to source or forge katana and wakizashi swords, according to the Carroll Times Herald

"To this day, trial by combat has never been explicitly banned or restricted as a right in these United States," Ostrom argued in court records, saying it was used "as recently as 1818 in British Court."

Monday, Ostrom told the Des Moines Register he got the idea after learning about a case in 2016 in which New York Supreme Court Justice Philip Minardo acknowledged that duels had not been abolished.

Ostrom said the motion stemmed from his frustrations with his ex-wife's attorney, Matthew Hudson.

"I think I've met Mr. Hudson's absurdity with my own absurdity," he said.

Ostrom said his ex-wife can choose her attorney as a "champion," or stand-in fighter. 

 

 

What if she chooses The Mountain?

spacer.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, crash_davis said:

Please dear god, tell me these idiots did not procreate.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/01/14/kansas-man-japanese-swordfight-settle-custody-battle-ex/4464045002/

DES MOINES, Iowa – A Kansas man asked an Iowa court to grant his motion for trial by combat, so he can meet his ex-wife and her attorney "on the field of battle where (he) will rend their souls from their corporal bodies."

David Ostrom, 40, of Paola, Kansas, claims in court documents that his ex-wife, Bridgette Ostrom, 38, "destroyed (him) legally."

He asked the Iowa District Court in Shelby County to give him 12 weeks' "lead time" to source or forge katana and wakizashi swords, according to the Carroll Times Herald

"To this day, trial by combat has never been explicitly banned or restricted as a right in these United States," Ostrom argued in court records, saying it was used "as recently as 1818 in British Court."

Monday, Ostrom told the Des Moines Register he got the idea after learning about a case in 2016 in which New York Supreme Court Justice Philip Minardo acknowledged that duels had not been abolished.

Ostrom said the motion stemmed from his frustrations with his ex-wife's attorney, Matthew Hudson.

"I think I've met Mr. Hudson's absurdity with my own absurdity," he said.

Ostrom said his ex-wife can choose her attorney as a "champion," or stand-in fighter. 

 

 

What if she chooses The Mountain?

Since it says custody battle right in the link I'm guessing that you won't be hearing from God.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Paola has what 50 people in it?  S. of KC in the middle of nowhere, which pretty much describes everywhere in KS.  My guess is the per meth capita there is very high.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, workswithseed said:

If he loses, does he have to commit sanpaku while she cuts his head off?

or bukkake if he wins.  Good trade-off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


mpu


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Recruiting ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Help ... For Sale ... Politics ... Board Discussion
×
×
  • Create New...