Jump to content

jdhorn92

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    2694
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jdhorn92

  1. Knew they were doomed after Foster's B10 presser at media days last year. Dude couldn't string together a few introductory sentences, before offering "....our school is located in Los Angeles..." Appeared to have zero prep or effort put in and the product on the field is mirroring that effort.
  2. Which would make sense but pictures of him in the stairwell show no signs of the said concealed rifle. timeline is jacked up. the video of the limp is before the event walking toward campus. the stairwell photos not so sure of timing. could he have stashed rifle on the roof then come back down and up and thats what the stairs photo are? Perhaps he concealed in his pants, dis-assembled it on campus, then put it together on the roof? possibly, but wouldn't really make sense
  3. He was being funny and you missed it.
  4. sure hope so. It was not a good look for the head of FBI to announce they had someone in custody, only to retract within an hour. At that level, you shouldn't be making things public unless you are 1000% accurate, not a good look to be wrong in that situation.
  5. Andrew Ross Sorkin is one of three hosts of the business show "Squawk Box" on from 5-8 am central on CNBC. He would be the liberal side of the scale to Joe Kernan, with Becky Quick providing a tonic to the trio. Ive watched or listened to that show for 30 years. The point of his note or article (not sure what the context of what's posted above) is made by referencing 3 instances of targeted attacks, all within the last few mos, no need to go deeper or source more imo.
  6. thats right amen brother. Beat the Miners!!
  7. that seems more CR type discourse . At this point lets find the shooter, prosecute the sumbitch.
  8. Had to be a sharp shooter...ive put up and taken down those cheap tents a hundred times at my kid's soccer games.... looked like he was sitting on a barstool, the amount of space from the bottom of tent to the head/neck area couldnt have been more than a few inches. He didnt look to be standing, but sitting "up" and the angle that bullet had to travel had to be very flat. Will be interesting to see the accident scene re-enactment.
  9. yes, on twiitter, be warned however its really bad. edit..sorry just reread your post. Disregard
  10. Saw the video on Twitter, by accident. My goodness, its horrific, no way he survives that. Its ISIS level gore.
  11. Clap-Clap-Clap. Lock it up.
  12. So what I have learned about our run game: 1. Overall it sucks 2. If we run the ball well its b/c the Defense is weak 3. If we dont run the ball well see #1 4. If we run a reverse to success and it adds to our rushing total, see #1 5. We have had numerous RB get drafted, everyone has seen the picture , see #1 6. We have had a few OL get drafted recently , see #1 7. If we run the ball to close out a game, kill clock and suck the life out of a D that is tired, we still revert back to #1 8. We have played, Clemson, ASU, tOSU twice, UGA (came within a turn of the the head in the wrong direction of beating them and winning SEC), TAMU going 3-3 and again see #1 AM right?!. Put me in the category of our run game is not perfect but it is far from poor.
  13. 2024 Michigan D had 4 guys drafted in first 3 rounds including 2 DT taken in first round and a DE to go along with potential NFL superstar Will Johnson.
  14. Running yards are like golf shots, they dont ask how, they just ask how many.
  15. We ran for 180 yards in the Sugar Bowl loss. Believe he said 'last few years...' or something like that...105 vs Bama one year and 161 the other year. found it: Against most of the better teams on our schedule the last 4 years we've struggled to run the ball at even an average level
  16. We blew Bama off the ball for 4 quarters and sealed with the run game. We ran the ball well vs Michigan and Clemson. I dont see this statement as being very accurate.
  17. I agree on whole. Colt really spoiled us with accuracy, QE was so accurate in the short and intermediate stuff and he had a really nice touch when it called for it....with Arch, imo he's not like anything we've seen in a long time...he may be more feast or famine and as he and Sark get comfortable with what he does best I believe he'll settle down and be great. It may take more time and thankfully we have a defense that may just make it work. Run game is a work in progress; Sark and Company will earn their bones picking and choosing what to call and when given what we have seen throhugh 2 game. I like the way this is setting up however all things considered. Im telling you , when the crossing route hits watch out. That is such an easy throw that of all the throws to not be connecting on that is one that gives me a lot of confidence that he's close to putting it together. I could be wrong but we haven't really done much orbit yet, that was staple of Sark's O with Davontae Smith, really easy throw in the flat to moving target out of the backfield, I mentioned in another thread and got heat that we may be saving for UF/OU....the pirouette screen blew up vs SJSU, QE ran that very well until it got old and we got stuffed. I think Sark is tinkering right now to find Arch's strength and ideally by UF/OU we have a plan. Im confident moving forward.
  18. Went back and watched both games. Im no expert. I have done a 180 on Arch. While not pretty....he's literally 3-4 passes and a couple other drops away from an outstanding start. Yes he's looked mechanically shaky but he's way better than the criticism so far. Posted this on another thread, we would much more prefer him to progress through the season than regress. 2 really bad passes to Wingo, the dirt throw to open tOSU, missed 2 other 2nd layer throws (one he took the deep ball in double coverage), threw a bullet to the TE when a soft toss was enough, then the 1 big drop last week....he also had one big play overturned by penalty....even half of those hit and we are having a much different discussion. We need be patient and be glad he has room to improve as the schedule plays out. Just my 2cents. Not sure this matters, but he's just barely 21 by a 4-5 mos. By end of next year if we make a January run, he'll be closer to 23...i think that matters, we need to let him mature.
  19. Pressure is something. Last year he was the backup, no matter how good he was , QE was the starter. This year, we have burned the boats. No going back, its has to be weighing on him, only explanation imo. Hes going to get better and id rather have him gradually improve then gradually get worse. Lets give him some time. As others have said, hes 3-4 throws and a couple other drops from him matching the hype.
  20. They don't call it a War on Drugs for nothing.
  21. @immamac posting under the 'there are no bad questions' veil...why do I have to keep opting out every time I log in re data share? Yes Im an old guy
  22. The shovel pass pick 6 before half was a killer, as was not punching in the first drive where got to the goal line. Ifs and buts, honestly it could have been 14-0 Texas after our first two drives.. we snuffed out the fake punt and had good field position after going up 3-0
  23. I have to believe that's coming. My guess would be we see that in Dallas, to totally show something OU has not seen all year. Also, have we gone 4- 5 wide yet? I dont recall us spreading out at all in the first two games. Maybe we are waiting for Mosely to get back. If/when we go 5 wide, we may be able to dink and dunk, mix in getting Arch on the run....perhaps that is part of not showing anything new until we get to the OU-UF stretch. Just spitballing.
  24. Arch is looking closer to a FR than a third year SO. We all need to realize his level of HS competition did him no favors, he just isnt that good, yet. Maybe he improves, but we equally could be seeing the max. His arm talent is weak compared to many other QBs you can easily see in any other games. Hes just not that talented. Sark will have his work cut out for him to try and gameplan around what he does well, which honestly I dont know what that is at this point. Palmer did a nice job on a replay showing how impatient and untrusting (timid) Arch is to throw the 2nd layer pass, over the LB, but under the safety...something QE did with ease. Add in the lack of touch and its very concerning. On the simple TE pass, he threw a Nolan Ryan fastball when a Charlie Hough knuckler would have sufficed, that is something a Jr should know how to execute....why are we not coaching that up?
  25. we're not beating any SEC foe by 30. Not saying we lose, but this team in it's current state is not beating any fellow SEC teams by 30.
×
×
  • Create New...