Jump to content

jimmyjazz

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    36694
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by jimmyjazz

  1. 18 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:

    A jr. senator, with no actual legislative experience to her than community organizer.  Your own team mate Brisket even recognized and went on in countless posts about how over his head the position was for his first term and a half.

     

    So save your he was a Senator schtick (1 1/2terms I believ,e and had a voting record of lots of no shows). He had zero experience running anything before being elected.   ZERO !

    The mind boggles at how utterly myopic you are.  For one thing, Senator trumps (heh) crook 7 days a week and twice on Sunday.  For another, the sheer intellect required to be president of Harvard Law Review and then a professor at The University of Chicago School of Law for 12 years so vastly exceeds whatever it isTrump has demonstrated that it reveals just how limited your own intellect is.

    You're actually defending Donald Trump.  A man who was born on third and thinks he hit a triple.  A man who has gone bankrupt so many times that it's impossible anyone with remote clarity of thought could possibly see him as a "success" in any meaningful way.  A bully who refuses to pay his bills, a philanderer, a racist, a misogynist, and a narcissist.  And yet you are defending him.

    Think about that.

    And for the record Brisket and I don't share any "team" other than the Longhorns, you fucking idiot.

  2. Just now, Onboard 2.0 said:

    And yet again you can't point to a single corroborated fact that says they did other than the whining from the losing candidate and the party that gave her the keys to the kingdom.

    I'm not the one making the absolute statement.  You are.  Go find where I said that the Russians were the reason Donald Trump won and I'll send you a coupon for a beer.

  3. 1 minute ago, Onboard 2.0 said:

    Please tell me about Mr. Obamas qualifications....  Nobody can ever seem to do that.......

    Holy shit, you ARE this stupid.  He was a fucking SENATOR for one thing.  He was a highly regarded attorney and community organizer. 

  4. 39 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:

    I voted against Hillary. Hillary carried Va. I knew she would. It didn't matter who I voted for, but yeah I vote for trump. I'd have voted for ANYONE over that POS.  That you think she's great tells me you're a pretty bad judge of character.

    Your character is nonexistent.  You fucking voted for Donald Trump.  You have a lot to learn.  And to think YOU are lecturing on character?  Fucking rich.

  5. 40 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:

    There Russians did not sway the election.

    And again, you cannot state that to be fact, no matter how many times you try.  Come on, you're not THIS stupid are you?

  6. 1 hour ago, bolverk said:

    Remind me Trump's qualifications again?

    The notion that the Russian propaganda campaign had zero effect is dumb. I'm not saying, however, it was the deciding factor but we should consider the following:

    Clinton received 227 electoral votes. Had she won PA, MI, & WI, she would've won the election with 273 electoral votes. Combined, Trump received  6,657,304 from those three states. Clinton, on the other hand, got 6,578,227. The difference was 79,077 or 0.6% (less than DKR on a bad day).

    Are you actually stating that 1 out of 167 persons couldn't have been swayed by disinformation? 

    I pointed this out yesterday and was greeted by a giant nothingburger.  Facts don't matter to a Trumpkin, of which there are many on this board.

  7. 1 hour ago, Steamboat1874 said:

    Please do not compare that DDA guy to us Wild Bunch members......

    It is insulting.

    Any screen shots of the large breasted woman in the white shirt behind the first base dugout?

    LHN had a great shot of her bending over showing us those great tits.

     

    That was my wife.

  8. 8 hours ago, Fozzz said:

    So your point is that since he can't prove Russian interference didn't cost Hillary the election, he's wrong? 

    Uh, If you state "___ is a matter of fact" and you don't actually know "___ is a matter of fact", then yeah, it's a reach.  Is this hard for you?

  9. 4 minutes ago, HtownHorn said:

    And if the study had said that guns were the devil incarnate, the study would have been the end all be all for the gun control movement. It's like Global Warming, Global Cooling, Climate Change. Keep researching until you get the results you want.

    You must hang out with a lot of really stupid people, because most of us are actually capable of assessing data and forming a more cogent conclusion than "hurr durr".

    • Like 1
  10. 5 minutes ago, Mo Horn said:
    This is a completely opposite viewpoint of everything he says or tweets on a regular basis. 

    ""Mayor Koch has stated that hate and rancor should be removed from our hearts. I do not think so. I want to hate these muggers and murderers. They should be forced to suffer ... Yes, Mayor Koch, I want to hate these murderers and I always will."

     

    Trump_Bring_Back_Death_Penalty_ad_1989.jpg

  11. 2 minutes ago, Hate said:

    I could absolutely agree with all of these.  What will you suggest when all of these have been implemented and someone 22 years old buys 2 pistols and a few 10 round magazines from a licensed firearm dealer and then goes and shoots up a school or concert or movie theater?  Will that be just the cost of freedom?  Or will you be back here calling for the ban of pistols and 10 round magazines?  I have yet to see anyone actually suggest a way to stop these things. Maybe because there is no way to stop these things from happening short of instituting some extremely Orwellian measures.  

    I've said it several times -- liberty comes at a price.  Right now we are arguing about what that price should be, but by no means does that imply the price should be "loss of all liberty".

    We're sentient beings.  We can think.  We can reason.  We do it all the time.  We have non-zero speed limits.  We (theoretically) allow people to drink a moderate level of alcohol and drive.  We allow people to own AR-15 firearms but not full auto machine guns (in most cases).

    There may come a day when we change the maximum allowable speed limit.  There are currently efforts to further reduce legal BAC while driving.  We are discussing firearm ownership on this thread.  All different flavors of the same discussion:  individual liberty VS public safety.

    The "slippery slope" hysteria is just that.

×
×
  • Create New...