Jump to content

TwiceHorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    39356
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by TwiceHorn

  1. Lil smokies are a world away from vienna sausages (maintain the old lips to peckers to assholea ratio perhaps). But I can imagine that baking them for a while might dry and firm up the viennas so they're less disgusting.
  2. And, probably most importantly, contribute more than they take.
  3. Seems oddly similar to what happened when we lost Tanner Witt. Team just nosedived for a while. To a greater degree than can be explained by the loss of a single pitcher.
  4. Also "he is the exception not the norm" is a complete load of horseshit.
  5. Except this timeline proves that this is pretty definitively not true. Truth in this administration is irrelevant. Expertise is ignored and even vilified.
  6. I mean, it's not just Walz, look at who is on his list. VP, SoS, DNI, whatever Witkoff is. Total opsec clown show.
  7. No comment on Audrey? Surly has evolved.
  8. So, I had to look at the docket. There's nothing in there that would indicate any reason for the government to settle, of course. Somewhat curiously, the government had not made a qualified immunity motion. But they were still jockeying around with jurisdictional motions. One fun thing, though. Apparently, the Babbits had hired a contingent fee lawyer out of Maryland to handle their case before Judicial Watch popped up. He has intervened with a fee lien so they're not going to get it all.
  9. I was told the Trump Admin would support LEO to the fullest extent of the law. Need to get some of those Wall Street motherfuckers on the defense for FREEEEEE.
  10. 13 Ks in 6 innings. Time to turn your jerseys wrong-side-out.
  11. Yeah, it's a more subtle form of whataboutism. Instead of Hunter's laptop, or HIllary's emails, it's Carter Page FISA warrants, use of tweets as sourcing, and neocon foreign policy.
  12. Yarvin gonna debate a Harvard prof at Harvard. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/02/curtis-yarvin-harvard?utm_source=newsshowcase&utm_medium=gnews&utm_campaign=CDAQ7Zmh-KzLtuyrARjP6N7v0trm65YBKhAIACoHCAowwo6qCzDCmcID&utm_content=rundown
  13. Somewhat amazingly, Bean continues to retain/maintain his law license. https://www.texasbar.com/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Find_A_Lawyer&template=/Customsource/MemberDirectory/MemberDirectoryDetail.cfm&ContactID=315152 Notable: Mr. Peter Justin 'Audrey' Bean https://williamsontx.mugshots.zone/bean-peter-justin-mugshot-12-25-2023/
  14. What about Norman fucking Oklahoma. Yknow, that Storm Prediction Center that everyone relies on?
  15. Because it's all legislative intent, which is murky shit. And, taking your example to the extreme, maybe it was only intended to give citizenship to blacks who were born here. Nonetheless, I think the answer is relatively clear, but because it's relatively clear doesn't mean it's certain to come out that way, because Calvinball. Those who claim the outcome is certain according to their desired outcome without engaging in analysis are as bad as those who engage in bad analysis to obtain their desired outcome.
  16. Right, I posted a summary of it. There's also the matter of children of diplomats, who are also not citizens by birth. But that's all probably later-arising stuff.
  17. Explain, then, what the addition "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" means. I'd suggest that it injects some ambiguity in it. I didn't say the argument was a winner, but it can't be dismissed quite as easily as you want to. You're really as bad as the Supreme Court justices you decry. You work your way backward from your desired result.
  18. I really like the idea of openings in the fuselage failing and him and any number of his sycophants being sucked out and free-falling to earth.
  19. Well, herein lies one of those annoying tiny nuggets of truth of post-modern conservatism: there is some rot in our culture, including rampant, silly materialism. Not that post-modern conservatism offers any solutions, especially given their base of billionaires created almost entirely on consumerism. But it makes for some sound bites here and there.
  20. Pretty good piece on lawfare on this. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-judge-dugan-case-is-more-complicated-than-it-seems Also goes into detail on the prior case against Mass judge Shelly Joseph that did a similar thing. She was investigated for a year, indicted (a far less hasty process than here), appealed motions to dismiss, and, ultimately dismissed by having Judge Joseph submit to the MA judicial conduct commission. That case was, of course, brought under the Trump administration, but continued by Biden, whose DOJ ultimately dismissed.
×
×
  • Create New...