In this argument, in which Bozo contends that the legal profession as a whole is in some sort of ethical crisis, I have said explicitly and repeatedly that it is no more in crisis than our government or nation as a whole. I don't so much contend that it isn't as I want to tease out why he says it and what is an "ethical crisis."
And, I will continue to point out that a sizable fraction of the legal profession and the lower courts, at least, of the judiciary, are elements of the government that are standing up against authoritarianism. Perhaps the fecklessness of 6 of 9 of the Supreme Court swallows that whole, but I tend not to extend the rank politicization of 6 political appointees to the profession as a whole.
Clearly, bozo thinks legal discipline and professional standards enforcement is inadequate. At least some of that stems from misunderstanding of how legal ethics deviate from general ethics. And, to sawbonz point, I think most professional ethics differ from personal morality in that by their nature they are highly situational, whereas an individual who employs situational ethics tends to be regarded as one step removed from unethical.