He actually can purchase, own and transfer firearms, but yeah...itās absolute bullshit that we canāt even get rid of an AG under indictment for fraud.
Why is no one really questioning the assumption that a bullshit national emergency move will be swiftly struck down by the courts? Whatās the relevant precedent, other than when SCOTUS ruled in favor of Japanese internment camp?
Yeah. And for some reason, one of mine is FUCKED after 3 years. Itās full and (I think) oxidizing. Itās never been touched by metal or out in the dishwasher. Sucks because I loved that pan.
Why not? SCOās only requirement is to give the report to the AG...thatās it. Trump CAN do all kinds of politically suicidal shit to prevent it from coming out...like firing the AG too.
If it was āegregiousā, the wording would have made it clear as such. This isnāt some amateur school council statement in the local newspaper where we just distill the gist of the language. It says what it says for a reason and it doesnāt say other āstuffā for a reason. My take? No fucking idea. Could be major or minor discrepancies. Of course, Iām sure you love to talk shit about the other side jumping to conclusions all the time, when thatās exactly what you did here.
Right, which is why the whole explanation in the article about the various āother evidenceā being the basis of the conclusion that Trump directed it.
Yep. These motherfuckers need to watch some Schoolhouse Rock or something. This whole āitās a waste of time to pass something that will get vetoedā rationale is 100% nonsense. There isnāt one GOP senator that actually believes that, but they throw it out there for idiots to eat up.
* See, example: GOP lege passing like 60 bills to repeal the ACA, knowing that it would be vetoed. Didnāt matter then to be āwasting timeā.
If there is such a crisis, why has Trump been, by his failure to act, murdering us with imported Fentanyl for 2 years, and letting MS13 gang rape elementary school girls, etc.?