Jump to content

scottsins

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1669
  • Joined

Everything posted by scottsins

  1. Finally I can get paid on my Kavanaugh confirmation PredictIt shares.
  2. Lol. I was wishfully thinking that you weren’t actually making ANOTHER “LOOK AT WHAT ORRIN HATCH SAID” post. negged for the “poors” comment, because, it’s lame AF, not accurate, and ignorant to think that you need a subscription to view WSJ articles.
  3. Attribute the quote that you pasted.
  4. Let me help you. Military personnel sign up and assume the risk that they may lose their life. Also, I’m not even convinced that some officer would make the choice to save $ over a person, but keep doing you I guess.
  5. Wait, so hypothetically, you would choose dogs and hoses over billions of dollars in damage?
  6. And he still supports the death penalty for the Central Park 5, AFTER they were exonerated on actual innocence claims.
  7. Maybe, but then again, these facts were known to Flake when he initially announced a Yes vote.
  8. The senators told her. I’m assuming that she edited/revised them for style, etc.
  9. Michael Bromwich is elite in these types of cases.
  10. There aren’t 2 guys willing to come forward and claim that responsibility. If there were, we would know their names.
  11. To elaborate: Mitchell wasn’t given the task of “go price this woman is lying”. Her task was “ask these questions that would make us look bad for asking.
  12. Mitchell is asking the questions that the GOP members have requested her to ask. It’s not really her personal belief or even professional judgment on display. No one said that she was iny need to be “neutral”.
  13. I’m withholding judgment until I see her question Kavanaugh (if she does).
  14. I think you mean that because Fox News is against confirmation, Trump will take their advice and act accordingly.
  15. I keep seeing conflicting accounts of who will be questioning Brett.
  16. Who gives a fuck? Swetnick did state that she saw BK in a line outside a room waiting his turn to run train on a drunk female.
  17. Why doesn’t the GOP leadership want an investigation? That’s what I’m asking.
  18. No clue. Give us your theory. Also, make sure to give us your explanation for the scenario where BK/the GOP have his nomination withdrawn without having the hearing.
  19. Polygraph questions are always “yes” or “no”. Not sure why the need to point that out.
  20. Yes, and yes.
  21. That was done, as it states in the report.
  22. The report refers to asking two “relevant questions” which refers to the “meat”. The baseline questions would. It be referred to as the “relevant questions”, IIRC.
  23. Not sure if this is over the line or not...but...pics?
  24. ... which is why they ask control questions with easy obvious true responses. ETA: The point is not that polygraphs are dispositive. They are just a piece to be considered with everything else.
  25. I concur. We use “pled” more than pleaded.
×
×
  • Create New...