Zoom I can see having some downside here but people will still use Slack even when going back to the office. Down 17% after hours hurts. Maybe I should have sold $40 yesterday
I'm in the SaaS MarTech/CXM space and all the projects in my pipe were put on hold so Q1/Q2 for me has been brutal. I've got a few existing accounts that I manage but they were really affected by COVID so not spending any new money so that's also slowed things down. I'm going to see if things take off here in the next few weeks/months but if not I'll probably be looking for another job as getting half pay is not going to cut it.
So what are the theories out there for how tickets might be distributed if the reduced capacity holds? Lottery by section? Donor levels? How on earth will donations be handled? If I only got Kansas tickets would I be paying the same percentage of my full donation as the person who gets OU? What a mess. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is there a good thread discussing the theories on tickets and seating? Even if you do buy tickets (and the secondary market) if 25% capacity holds wouldn’t that mean it’s unlikely those tickets will not be valid. Especially if top donors get preference. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I haven't had access to my 401K recently so I'm not sure where it sits (but I never touched it so I'm hoping close). But thanks to a few nice moves my IRAs are well ahead of where they went Jan 1.
I bought $WORK and $ZM right at IPO last year. Zoom has obviously done well but I'm so overjoyed Slack is finally back to that price. Loss aversion bias I guess
Changing gears a bit... I went to Matt's El Rancho the other night for dinner and damn. Very little masks and you would have thought this whole thing was over. Groups meeting up and greeting each other with hugs. Such an odd time when I'm put off by other people enjoying a warm embrace.
Potentially... we don't really know that yet do we? I'm not saying that we don't learn from the past however articles about what we should/could have done different right now in this point in time are probably written for various other reasons.
Population density could and is controlled by the government who sets the building and land codes?
The point is more likely a political play to point fingers and shift blame. This event was nothing like anything that had been faced before? How did we really know that we should (could) have locked things down in March. Better use to time and resources to work toward solutions then just trying to stir people up with sensationalism.
I saw this article on the NYTimes yesterday... what a dumbass article that does not accomplish anything. I mean if NYC wasn't a shithole with everyone living on top of each other we could have saved 40K lives too. What's the point?
Yep. Selling big gains on $XOM and $OKE might be a good idea in case they announce and the stock takes a hit like Shell did but I still think they are solid ones to hold as long as you are not over invested.
Does the city go back to trying to at least enforce some decency or is downtown doomed? These “camps” all have several porta potties too to ensure it’s an easy time. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Great pictures! I haven't been there in 10 years and was thinking about taking a trip back soon either here or trying another island. Where did you stay on the north side?
I don't think it really started trading until a few weeks ago post acquisition with Diamond Eagle. If you are looking at charts with a longer timeframe I'm not I would use that to gauge. It's on my radar as well and I bought a little at $19 but sold about break even last week waiting for lower.