Jump to content

Serak The Preparer

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Serak The Preparer

  1. Don't think so. Banchero is the x factor. I would be thrilled if Ivey drops though.
  2. Smith or Ivey for me. Nothing sets back a rebuild like a whiff, ask the 76ers. I don't know that chet will whiff but I don't think his upside offsets the much larger chance of being a whiff.
  3. Me too. Sorry thought the joke was clear but misfired. I feel like I should know but also am not sure.
  4. Oh come on it's been posted like 3 or 4 times. Hell Wulaw himself has probably mentioned it every time he steps out of the sex tent. It's a well known fact at this point. It's... something like 3 I think? Maybe 4? Definitely better than 6.
  5. Fair enough. I suspect that the other was viewed as just a troll thread hence just deletion, no salvaging for an actual discussion. I don't think this was intentionally started as a troll thread but the OP was dumb and did an effective job of poisoning the well. But discussion is at least possible. Just my thoughts, obviously not a mod. Both @52-80 and whatever his name is (Hollywood colt something or other) were stupid in different ways.
  6. Did you read the thread before it was nuked? Last time I saw it was maybe 10-15 posts, with all but one or two being a variation of "this thread is stupid".
  7. Two things can be true. Draymond is clearly a very smart and athletic defender. He also commits a lot of fouls that aren't called, in large part because he is so smart. Just like Maddox used to get any questionable pitch (and a fair amount of unquestionable pitches) called a strike due to earned reputation for control, Draymond more than gets the benefit of the doubt. When you are not a Warriors fan that gets pretty fucking irritating.
  8. So you went through the effort of starting a post and linking a news article without reading the first paragraph of the article you are linking to (or even reading the URL)? "FOLLOWING the death of a 16-year-old boy – who was shot dead in Chicago – police made two arrests after reports of an active shooter left two wounded." I'm pretty sure it's not over the Buffalo massacre.
  9. Have to agree. I certainly don't miss @Onboard 2.0 at all but his suspension that led to his tantrum was similarly capricious. Now there are certainly some that literally only come in to this forum to troll and avoid discussion (e.g. clapclap. caponeta) but for all his shitiness Sack will actually occasionally respond. I'm also not sure he gets more personal than others do to him.
  10. You mean losing a race to closetojumping another surly poster?
  11. How does the hand take the length?
  12. Ah yes - the "I'm reasonable and I think this, therefore reasonable people think this" approach. Just because you (or even necessarily the majority of people) think something does not make it reasonable.
  13. Hmm, ask Cisco why they grew so quickly in 5G and networking equipment. I don't think 9-9-6 will be the first response.
  14. Or eating lunchmeat (listeria risk), unpasteurized milk, etc. If we put a little effort into we could really create the perfect environment for developing fetus, mother be damned. Of course once it's out, good luck little fella - you're gonna need it.
  15. I think part of it is also like a formal strike / warning. Yes he can likely get in to a game either at Dallas or somewhere else, but if he's caught then he is formally trespassing and can have charges brought to him (no lawyer).
  16. Narrator: they did send over the smartest guy they got.
  17. Hah, he didn't specify MLB ballparks. Bringing in minors makes it at least possible, but extending it to little league makes it a little tougher.
  18. Zeus is legit special, like in the vaccines help 5g reception kinda way. So yes, lots of help needed.
  19. You should have parlayed that for a chance at some real money.
  20. Huh, I always thought the phrase was about a blimp in the air, not about a large water mammal. I guess I've never read much about it or seen a doc or anything outside of the footage of it.
  21. I don't think lsufreek needs to worry about any new competition but couldn't resist:
  22. No, it isn't designed to injure, grieve, or afflict, no more than any legislative action ever passed. Seriously, other than naming random days / months "National XX Day", give a piece of legislature that doesn't have winners or losers. If you want to water down a word that much then it's obviously up to you but it makes you look, well, aggy.
  23. Good grief, do you regularly start speeches with "According to Webster..."? And if you do, do you even read the understand the words you use? 1: to harass or punish in a manner designed to injure, grieve, or afflict; specifically : to cause to suffer because of belief 2: to annoy with persistent or urgent approaches (such as attacks, pleas, or importunities) : PESTER If you want to try and be literal and claim we are persecuting Bezos, etc., please explain how anything in this thread is either designed to injure, grieve, or afflict, or annoy with persistent or urgent approaches. If the claim is that raising task rates is designed to injure, grieve, or afflict then the word can be applied to virtually any action ever taken given that there are winners and losers in every transaction. Aggie education indeed.
  24. Umm, has anyone PM'ed Derka about this?
×
×
  • Create New...