Jump to content

Captainant

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    17501
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Captainant

  1. 1 minute ago, Hate said:

    I have no idea who either of those people you posted are and I’m not sure I’ve ever posted a YouTube video in relation to the riots. But you’ve already proven to be a hypocrite in that the “running off the road” incident you mentioned in the Biden bus story has already shown that the alleged victim was indeed the aggressor in that particular scenario according to the local sheriff’s office. I posted a link last week. Weird how that fun little fact went by the mainstream wayside. The fact of the matter is I disagree with anyone committing destructive acts whether it be burning & looting businesses or plotting to kidnap a governor. You can put your partisanship aside for just one moment to acknowledge that both are not good for anyone. Give it a try sometime. You might like....oh, who am I kidding. You can’t and won’t.

    I missed that link, can you share it again? I recall there being competing narratives but ultimately it seemed that with all the context that the large truck driver was the instigator and in fact has a (criminal) history of violent behavior. 

  2. 2 minutes ago, Hate said:

    Nobody has supported violence against elected officials. I don’t know what you are talking about.

     

    2 minutes ago, Hate said:

    Nobody has supported violence against elected officials. I don’t know what you are talking about.

    Indeed, but likewise yall are seemingly reluctant to consider its existence while happily shitposting andy ngo and jack probesic and a non-zero number of tweets and youtube vids that were later taken down because they were disinformation.

    It's almost like a pattern of deflection whenever it comes up could be seen as tacit a defense of that behavior or something???

  3. 2 minutes ago, Hate said:

    Stop engaging Capt taint. It’s impossible for him to process that “left leaning” people have also engaged in destructive behaviors.

    I just want to make sure that yall considered """both sides""" when clutching your pearls and bemoaning the ongoing violence. Since ya know, attacking elected official, candidates, and the election process itself isn't near as bad as the worst sin of all - PROPERTY DAMAGE!!! [dun dun dunnnnn]

     

  4. 6 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

    Is this about that time of month where the narrative switches from "We're overreacting, it's not THAT serious" to "this was all inevitable, nothing could have been done to prevent these spikes"?

     

    7 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

    Bodies in Trees!

    yuuuuuuup. Although we can't really be sure until @ChickenSandwich starts giving us his daily updates again

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Like 1
  5. 10 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

    That place is a simpler train wreck, love it 

    only a matter of time before they discuss a race war to suppress their votes in the cities 

    My favorite is that they're already banning dissenting opinions from the platform. MUH FREE SPEECH!!! 

  6. 11 minutes ago, troph said:


    Heartbreaking is right. I posted to my fb feed begging folks to stand up and reach out to those ensnared by Q nonsense.

    I just listened to a short podcast that was one woman's story of losing her mother to conspiracies and Q. When she described her mom's behavior to a neurologist, she was told it shared many symptoms with early onset dementia. 

    https://pca.st/episode/2f297007-1ba2-488b-9b03-c3cdac83f85a

  7. 3 hours ago, MoJames said:

    So approximately 2 years ago the drug company Biogen put into stage III trials their new monoclonal antibody focused on plaque build up of a certain type in Alzheimer's. Their hope obviously was to augment plaque production to change the progression of Alzheimer's Dementia. Well about a year ago, they all but abandoned the drug as the clinical findings were that there was no significant change in the progression of the awful disease.

    Well apparently the data was reviewed and secondary endpoints were closely evaluated as the primary goal had failed. Well turns out someone was able to find in the data some statistical differences in the outcome of independence. As such, the FDA started moving towards approval of the drug. Well the drug is an infusion that one would do once a month. For those who aren't in medicine, adding an infusion cost to a medication increases cost substantially. On top of that the secondary endpoint that showed benefits was that is potentially prolonged patients' independence by several months. 

    Several Neurologists stepped up to show dismay on the decision of the FDA to approve the medication that showed little to any benefits. As such, the FDA put together a commission of independent Neurologists to review the data. 10 of the 11 did not recommend approval of the drug with the final sitting firmly on the fence. On Friday the NYT put out this article on the process thus far and today in my neurology clinic the drug rep showed up to determine how we would respond to the medication.

    Link

    I'm curious from the general population, how they feel about this keeping in mind that one year of the drug is around $60,000. This is not including the cost of the infusion clinic. Currently 5.8 million patients in the USA are noted to have Alzheimer's dementia. The benefit of the drug is to potentially prolong independence by several months.

    My dad with advance Parkinson's was nearly killed by a similar anti-hallucination drug. Same story, rushed FDA approval. Bad shit, rushing science rarely leads to good things

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Like 1
  8. 2 minutes ago, anacardo said:

    The fraud is real and it’s staggering

    The DNC-CIA-Woke Capital-Journalism complex went all in and got called

    This is going to leave the great majority of this forum with a lot of difficult questions which I will be happy to post about for the curious once Trump is sworn in again and AOC’s ability to throw me in a gulag is severely compromised

    go home, TJ. You're drunk.

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Like 1
  9. 2 minutes ago, immamac said:

    I'm not sure how this all plays out, but he's making it nearly impossible to just let him fuck off to his golf courses for the rest of his life. If he keeps this up there will be no other choice than to put him away for inciting riots and straight up treason. Like literally treason if he keeps this up after Jan 20. 

    IMO, if he delays the electors voting in the EC on Dec 14, that's an act of treason as well. 

    Just now, immamac said:

    Trump is playing the most dangerous game. He must be facing something far worse than prison if he actually loses. 

    And no shit, he's personally liable for over $400MM of loans. Many of them to russian strongmen. It's not just that they know where the bodies are buried, but they know where they'll bury donald too.

    • Like 1
  10. 3 minutes ago, TtomTerrific said:

    ok....but that's not true...they are paying fewer taxes and immune from law suit because, under 203 they are considered public utlity as long as they are not pushing an agenda.   Fox News and the New York Times don't have this advantage.  You can chose not to read them as well.  That's the point   You can't take this special designation as an "exempt entitiy" addiding untold trillions if not hundreds of billions to your bottom line BECAUSE you are a non-editorial "utlity"....at least under 230....but then violate the fuck out of the one rule that there is that affords you those benefits.

     

    That's... Not remotely close to how section 230 applies, and it imparts no tax benefits lol. It's a partial protection against copyright liability, that's it. Surly happens to be a beneficiary as well. 

    You should actually read the source documents you're ranting about because you're showing your red ass

    • Hook 'Em 4
    • Like 2
    • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
×
×
  • Create New...