Jump to content

Willfully Horn

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    6045
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Willfully Horn

  1. Something similar, yes. My quick search does not find me wrong, either, though particular jurisdiction might have some bearing.
  2. I assumed there was an oath of office required of LEO.
  3. Is it your position that LEO have a constitutionally protected right to make unsupported allegations that do the exact opposite of uphilding and defending the Constitution?
  4. Settlement? WTF?
  5. Racists have the right to assemble and spout their hate, but too often their protests are not peaceful. And the cops don’t seem as concerned when the no violence rule is broken as they do when the no tent rule is ignored. Go figure.
  6. Objecting to cops killing murderous dogs is as whacky as objecting to paying taces to feed the hungry and housing the homeless.
  7. Ah, youth. Zero point two,
  8. Assume consent is granted when I straddle her chest.
  9. Uniparty might as well be #bothsides.
  10. Since you invoked Godwin, please consider his thoughts, as he expressed in a WAPO editorial, which is found at the link. Here’s an excerpt: ”Godwin’s Law has also functioned, to quash appropriatecomparisons of today’s horrors to the 1930s and 1940s? I continue to insist that Godwin’s Law should never be read as a conversation-ender or as a prohibition on Hitler comparisons. Instead, I still hope it serves to steer conversations into more thoughtful, historically informed places.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/12/20/godwins-law-trump-hitler-comparisons/
  11. Frank’s a chump. It is known.
  12. Didn’t I already say the same thing in my post you quote? Each of the second tier outlets has a left-center bias, so I see from where you are coming. News, however, doesn’t happen in a vacuum, and explaining the context of news is, to me, an important part of journalism. Knowing their bias is on me. Which led me to mbfc, which, you will find, says what you say about op-ed.
  13. Reuters and Science.org. Then: AP, BBC, NPR, and the Texas Tribune, which differ from Reuters not on accuracy, but on story selection, and the perspective from which they tell it. There’re other outlets that belong in the discussion, Mediabiasfactcheck is on the level.
  14. Is this true? Because it sounds like rhetoric. No doubt, there are propagandists masquerading as journalists, but, absent proof, I would think there are upstanding souls fighting the good fight. Any reason I should believe you?
  15. YouTube has a number of clips from the Stern interview. I challenge those who think Biden is significantly diminished to do the same. He’s hanging with Stern. Going forward, such disinformation will warrant a fuck you emoji.
  16. Friend of mine was awarded the contract to remove those relics of shame. Win - win.
  17. Thank Lucifer Surly has experts in death, mayhem, and caliber.
  18. Whatever happened with that baasskap?
  19. I was thinking the price for keeping Texas weed intolerant went up precipitously.
  20. I’ve been on that list since I called the FBI and told them they were fools for not releasing the unabomber’s manifesto. They’re just pissed I was right.
  21. None of these links load an image for me. But, I don’t have a twitter account. Nevertheless, links usually load. Has their policy changes? Do they load for anyone else?
  22. Holy fuck, spoiler that shit. Clicked to see sexy women, left with axe murder stuck in my head.
  23. I enjoyed his closing comments. Not particularly funny, but he was respectful to Joe, and he honored his own grandfather. He invoked decency. Worked for me. IMO the campaign should make that footage unavoidable.
×
×
  • Create New...