Jump to content

Codaxx

Full Members
  • Posts

    5853
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Codaxx

  1. Didn’t Mac have 3 1st round WRs and a 1st round RB.. Not to mention a dominant OL. That was one of the best situations any QB has ever been dropped into. Not remotely comparable to this Texas team
  2. I thought he looked better. He did account for 9.8 yards/att, over 300 total yards, and 5 TDs.. He still doesn’t trust himself over the middle of the field. That is where a lot of the off target throws are and where the turn downs have occurred. His pocket feel was really good. He is really helping the OL in pass protection. Easy mover
  3. Not sure what it is, but Arch to Wingo connection is nonexistent through 2 games. It has looked really ugly at times
  4. Little sketchy this game. SJSU went after Littleton. I think I saw 3 times that SJSU WRs got behind the secondary. That needs to be cleaned up. Obviously using a hyper critical eye based on the competition.
  5. That fumble was brutal for Gibson and the team. He looked like the best runner we saw on the season and then he fumbled. I am sure the coaches would love to play him more, but his fumble rate makes it impossible
  6. Homer was going off on the Sark offense. He is saying it is unnecessarily complicated. Lot of offenses do really simple stuff in college at a high level. Everything is progression reads and the WRs are doing their own reads. We went from 3-5 screens a drive to 3-5 a game. He was using example like if the CBs are off just run simple hitches to get 4-6 easy yards.
  7. Not getting any easy explosives. Like to see more playing making out of the skill players. Turn 5-10 into 40-50
  8. If you end up wearing down Georgia in the 4Q to pad the average, I’ll be very happy. I don’t think Texas OL should rely on that vs SJSU. It about the level of competition
  9. It is vs San Jose State. The gave up 263 and 4.7 to Central Michigan. They wore them down late in the game to make it look better. You would like the run game to be dominant vs cupcakes
  10. the OSU grades were not great. Baker looks to be a weakness (first 2 games, so he can will get better). Manning moves well in the pocket. Making the pass pro look better Y
  11. Saw Niblett out there blocking on a couple screens. That might be a physics problem
  12. It a much more vertical offense this year. that adds volatility. Add in that Arch and Livingstone (crazy) are the playmakers on this team. Arch is really up and down, so that just adds more. OL just isn’t consistent
  13. I expected Townsend to be that uber-athletic TE that is more WR, than TE (especially early in his career). He got after it blocking, which surprised me and will get him on the field quicker
  14. Not concerned about Townsend. he showed way more blocking ability than expected
  15. Little concerned with using Nibblett as a blocker on those WR screens.
  16. Just too many inconsistencies. The OL and penalties have me most concerned. Texas was 73rd in penalties last year also
  17. More concerned about the penalties. Average distance was 9.7 yards. That is more of a 1st and 2nd problem. Texas went 0-6 on 3rd and 9 or more.
  18. Nice blocking by Wingo downfield in the TD. Not sure that scores without his effort
  19. I have noticed he doesn’t always give great effort when he isn’t expecting the ball
  20. It’s true. He struggled with throws 5-7 yards all day. That throw was one of the better throws he threw in the game
  21. that was last year. I put Banks in the "monster" category. Goosby grades looked really good, because overall the OL did not grade out well.
  22. just for context Banks 88.2 overall (89.9 pass/82.4 run) Goosby was solid, but not in the monster tier yet.. 70.0–79.9: Average/Starter. The player is meeting expectations for their position. 80–89.9: Good/Above Average. A grade reflecting solid, consistent, and high-level play.
  23. I just used AI on the Texas grades. You can do the same for Bama. I dont feel like goign through Bama, since we dont play them.
  24. It was only 11 snaps,but I would definitely argue for more snaps for Neto to get a bigger sample size to make the decision
  25. neto: 65.6 overall (80.4 pass block/63.2 run)
×
×
  • Create New...