Jump to content

Codaxx

Full Members
  • Posts

    5890
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Codaxx

  1. Not concerned about Townsend. he showed way more blocking ability than expected
  2. Little concerned with using Nibblett as a blocker on those WR screens.
  3. Just too many inconsistencies. The OL and penalties have me most concerned. Texas was 73rd in penalties last year also
  4. More concerned about the penalties. Average distance was 9.7 yards. That is more of a 1st and 2nd problem. Texas went 0-6 on 3rd and 9 or more.
  5. Nice blocking by Wingo downfield in the TD. Not sure that scores without his effort
  6. I have noticed he doesn’t always give great effort when he isn’t expecting the ball
  7. It’s true. He struggled with throws 5-7 yards all day. That throw was one of the better throws he threw in the game
  8. that was last year. I put Banks in the "monster" category. Goosby grades looked really good, because overall the OL did not grade out well.
  9. just for context Banks 88.2 overall (89.9 pass/82.4 run) Goosby was solid, but not in the monster tier yet.. 70.0–79.9: Average/Starter. The player is meeting expectations for their position. 80–89.9: Good/Above Average. A grade reflecting solid, consistent, and high-level play.
  10. I just used AI on the Texas grades. You can do the same for Bama. I dont feel like goign through Bama, since we dont play them.
  11. It was only 11 snaps,but I would definitely argue for more snaps for Neto to get a bigger sample size to make the decision
  12. neto: 65.6 overall (80.4 pass block/63.2 run)
  13. Yes.. He was the only one PFF graded at starter level. Baker and Stroh...oof
  14. Pieced together the PFF OL grades: PFF grades: DJ Campbell: 60.7 (69.4 pass/57.9 run) Connor Stroh; 44.9 (64.3 pass block/39.1 run) Brandon Baker: 41 (35.6 pass/55.3 run) Cole Hutson: 63.2 (52.7 pass/63.8 run) Goosby: 73.9 (77.9 pass/69.2 run)
  15. You did not comment on the fact that Livingstone had a step and was 1 on 1 and appeared to be running to open grass. If that was a TD, you would not have said a word. That is the main component of this. The examples I mentioned. 1 was a caught, but the process was terrible. The other was an incompletion and the process was terrible. Those were WTF moments, this not in the same ballpark as those
  16. Look at the bottom picture. Both guys have a step on their defender. This is not a bad read. Off the top of my head the check down, when the over was coming open and the deep ball to Wingo when Arch misread the CB bailing were bad reads. You can have a preferred option here, but you are not saying this is terrible decision. There is difference between a BAD read and a QB taking what he is comfortable with. Texas generally avoided the middle of field all game, I am sure that had a lot do with the scouting report on OSU safeties.
  17. not a doctor, but I think most doctors would say every case is based on the individual. There is also the mental aspect of injuries. Sometimes it takes a while after a guy is fully healthy for him to trust his body fully. Not the answer you are looking for, but I dont think even CJ knows when he will be the same.
  18. this site burns down
  19. His PFF breakdown gave him 87.3 passer rating in clean pocket. Gave him a 35.3 grade under pressure. He was sped up and anytime there was a hint of pressure the mechanics completely broke down (not always great with a clean pocket either, but not as bad). The first pass of the game we saw what the mechanics looked like with pressure. Oddly seemed more sped up in the short game. If you are taking positive from Arch's game, it is he is an elite deep ball passer. Even in a disaster like the OSU game, he was still very good on deep balls. Hard to explain but his comfort zone is throwing it deep.
  20. Given the injury history and lack of experience, it would not have been bad to bring in a proven RB. I did not see any great runs. Mostly got what the OL blocked. Texas used 2 RBs in the game and one of them is not 100%. Great blitz pick up by Baxter in this game though. I assume Baxter will show more with the football in hands as the season goes on, I doubt he is 100%. Of the 6 RBs only 1 came into the season trusted and healthy (Wisner). Clark had 0 experience and was coming off major injury. Gibson came in with major trust issues. The other 2 are true freshmen. Its room with potential, but also a lot of questions.
  21. I am not sounding the panic button, simply saying that the stats do not tell the whole story
  22. I always respect someone that fights the impossible fight. Good luck
  23. We can disagree. I think OSU conceded the run between the 20s by scheme. I can flip the coin and say the 25% pressure rate by the Texas defense was bad. The stats say it is bad, so it must be. Or I can say OSU chipped and ran a lot of quick game that limited the pass rushing opportunities.
  24. OSU ran light boxes and focused on the pass game. They pretty much disrespected the Texas run game. They dared Texas to run the football, which is interesting considering that was Arch's first road start. Texas could not force them out of light boxes. Struggled to run in the red zone, when they did not have a numbers advantage. If team runs light boxes against you and you cannot force them out of it or convert in short yardage, it is not a success. It might have been interesting if Sark force fed the run vs the light boxes and let Arch throw deep shots, which was the only thing he did well vs OSU. I believe OSU pressure rate vs Texas was 35%. Texas was at 25%
×
×
  • Create New...