That is in no way analogous. Atleast try to Steelman the thing.
The respondees probably dont have much of a choice in their answers.
Hamas rose out of a 2-party conflict. There hasnt been elections in almost 2 decades. Supposedly, they shot and killed their “own people” trying to flee the territories.
With that in mind, what do you think people in the Gaza strip (where they undemocratically wrestled control) would answer if asked publicly for affiliation?
How do you equate that to a hypothetical American support of a hyper-fringe extremist sect when they’re free and clear to support the popular parties.
Further, if you read the actual source of that graphic (Arab Barometer Wave), **overwhelmingly** peoples priorities were on economic well-being, education, health care; and they showed strong preference for democratic systems. They also shared low (and declining) trust in the govt/public institutions.
Not unlike America, its economics that truly drive their (the citizens’) politics, not military activities/policies.
In summary, an interpretation of the result is that it merely represents party prevalence — that the 2 highest answers reflect the 2 current parties — but does not imply 30% endorsement of terrorism. (any more than you can claim the US popular vote means 20% endorse the most loony/extreme idea from each party).
The 10% support for P.I.J. is much more obvious because they explicit call for total destruction of Israel. But given how much of the IL-PL conflict negatively and materially affected their lives, 10% is not a surprise at all.