Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, naija said:

I'm sorry. You can't be that obese and wear a shirt saying GRIND.

He just removed the R at the end, and is now ready to party, err, work harder. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, satyanash said:

Going to have to prepare ourselves for the very real possibility that A&M is undefeated heading into Thanksgiving. Mizzou is the only real threat on their schedule before that. LSU, Arkansas, MSU, SCar and Florida are all absolute dogwater.

I can see them losing at least three of those games.

Posted
11 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

I feel like some of the posters here haven't actually watched aggy play.

I have. That’s why I think they lose to Mizzou. Hardy is going to run over them.  
 

I don’t think they go into Death Valley and roll over them either. It’ll be like today’s game and Nussmeyer isn’t as bad as Arnold. 
 

They don’t trust Reed as much as Aggie fans think. 
 

they’re losing 3 games. One will most likely be an upset 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 hours ago, satyanash said:

Going to have to prepare ourselves for the very real possibility that A&M is undefeated heading into Thanksgiving. Mizzou is the only real threat on their schedule before that. LSU, Arkansas, MSU, SCar and Florida are all absolute dogwater.

You Got Me GIF by HULU

  • Haha 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Hank_Hill said:

We’re going 3-0 in the rivalry games again

I haven't seen the SHSU game, but it sure seems to have changed a lot of minds. Hope y'all are right.

A&M looks pretty good. It's a year where it's hard to tell how good anyone is. I know we have a great defense. That's about it.

Craver and the Mexican guy for A&M, are they really that unstoppable or is it the competition? So very hard to tell so far.

Okay, time for another drink, my friends.

  • Haha 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

I haven't seen the SHSU game, but it sure seems to have changed a lot of minds. Hope y'all are right.

A&M looks pretty good. It's a year where it's hard to tell how good anyone is. I know we have a great defense. That's about it.

Craver and the Mexican guy for A&M, are they really that unstoppable or is it the competition? So very hard to tell so far.

Okay, time for another drink, my friends.

They scored 16 whopping points today.

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said:

I had this game as my most likely WTF loss on our schedule. I’d be really scared of Cowbell in Starkville, but I’m hoping they shot their shot against UT. 

Yea, I can't tell how good the Aggies are or anyone else for that matter. I agree about MSU. I'd imagine they're wrung out after today's game, and y'all get them at home.

It's a wide open year. I think we were picked to be number one a year early because sportswriters are idiots. If Arch has become the monster we've expected, then maybe this will be our year. 

Congrats on your win, BTW. 

Edited by RomaVicta
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

They scored 16 whopping points today.

They being the Aggies, yes. Those receivers looked fast and often open. 

Also, recognizing how the football board operates, I'm not predicting shit. I'm wondering about the general opinion of those two guys. Are they the cream of receivers this season in college football?

1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

Wait. Are you doing a bit?

Always.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

I haven't seen the SHSU game, but it sure seems to have changed a lot of minds. Hope y'all are right.

 

Arky is a disaster, OU without Mateer should scare nobody, and A&M looks pedestrian. I like our odds, especially with getting A&M at home.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
2 hours ago, Pancho said:

Plotting The Simpsons GIF

He knows his audience very well. Going 4-0 is a huge achievement that is the envy of the college football world. Has it ever been done before? Has a dog ever bitten a man?

This Ivy-leaguer knows historic when he sees it.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

Arky is a disaster, OU without Mateer should scare nobody, and A&M looks pedestrian. I like our odds, especially with getting A&M at home.

aggy is the only one of those games that gives me pause. We're going to ass rape OU again and Arky doesn't have a prayer of winning in DKR. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

So let me get this straight . . . aggy receivers looked fast and got open often, but they could only find the endzone once at home against a bad Auburn team.

That sounds about right.

You're getting tiresome. If you want to engage read the fucking posts. I. Am. Talking. About. The. Quality. Of. Those. Two. Receivers. Not the Aggie offense in general. Try to get that straight or just go to bed. You're having trouble parsing shit. 

The receivers were missed by the passer. That is not a statement about the quality of the receivers. Read this a few times. Then sleep on it. Then return and miss the point again. I find myself marginally concerned at the most.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

You're getting tiresome.

Awww, that is so sweet!

But for reals, aggy has good ass receivers but can't score, yo.

aggy sucks, dawg.

Edited by David Dennison
Posted
13 hours ago, RomaVicta said:

I haven't seen the SHSU game, but it sure seems to have changed a lot of minds. Hope y'all are right.

A&M looks pretty good. It's a year where it's hard to tell how good anyone is. I know we have a great defense. That's about it.

Craver and the Mexican guy for A&M, are they really that unstoppable or is it the competition? So very hard to tell so far.

Okay, time for another drink, my friends.

Sooo you haven’t watched them actually play then? 

13 hours ago, RomaVicta said:

You're getting tiresome. If you want to engage read the fucking posts. I. Am. Talking. About. The. Quality. Of. Those. Two. Receivers. Not the Aggie offense in general. Try to get that straight or just go to bed. You're having trouble parsing shit. 

The receivers were missed by the passer. That is not a statement about the quality of the receivers. Read this a few times. Then sleep on it. Then return and miss the point again. I find myself marginally concerned at the most.

Wait YOU were the one who said “they look pretty good” after that’s shitastic performance, then switch it up to “oh well…I men’s the WRs are good”?!?

Cool. Too bad they still gotta get the ball to them and they don’t trust their QB and won’t lean on the run game.  
 

and their defense is garbage.   That’s the part everyone keeps missing.  A good run game feats on them.  
 

that’s why they’ll lose to Mizzou at least, and Mississippi St has a shot.  

Posted
15 minutes ago, Drew said:

Sooo you haven’t watched them actually play then? 

Wait YOU were the one who said “they look pretty good” after that’s shitastic performance, then switch it up to “oh well…I men’s the WRs are good”?!?

Cool. Too bad they still gotta get the ball to them and they don’t trust their QB and won’t lean on the run game.  
 

and their defense is garbage.   That’s the part everyone keeps missing.  A good run game feats on them.  
 

that’s why they’ll lose to Mizzou at least, and Mississippi St has a shot.  

Go back and read the posts. My query was clearly about the quality of those two receivers.

Your proclamations bore me.

Posted
4 hours ago, RomaVicta said:

Go back and read the posts. My query was clearly about the quality of those two receivers.

Your proclamations bore me.

I’m an Aggie so feel free to toss this but as objectively as possible:

Craver and Concepcion are good. Really good. They are open and open deep very often.  Reed has no touch on his deep ball and that’s just who he is. I expect that a few of these will eventually land just due to statistics, but the deep ball is more of a theoretical than actual threat. 
 

A&M missed a few field goals, got a TD called back, and threw an INT on short yardage in the red zone at a time when Moss was falling for four YPC. Klein special. Also lots of penalties, the refs called a tight game but I don’t expect that to get fixed: sloppy play has been consistent under Elko. 
 

Auburn’s defense is very good— a top 30 even with their putrid offense with lots of NFL talent, and the final tally was 414 yards divided between rushing and passing evenly.  414-171 should have been a much worse score but the weakeness A&M showed is not fluky but a pattern. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
6 hours ago, RomaVicta said:

Go back and read the posts. My query was clearly about the quality of those two receivers.

Your proclamations bore me.

No I read your original post and you said they looked good as a team. Then changed it to WRs. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Drew said:

No I read your original post and you said they looked good as a team. Then changed it to WRs. 

I did say the first, but the question was about the second. You've proclaimed you disagree about the first (give me time to get over that), and you shy from the second. I bet you were a pretty snappy 2A high school debater. I'm filled with admiration and awe. 

Run along now.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...