Jump to content

PTINS

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    707
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by PTINS

  1. I did not mention "speech" in my post. That is the Freedom I cherish the most. You are free to tell my boss he's a fucking idiot, and he is free to fire you. I merely responded to where you might exercise that freedom. The freedom to assemble is provided for, but that does not mean you can do it wherever you want. The right to defend and protect your life and property are also provided for. But like it or not, agree or not, the City of Austin had/has a well known position of choosing not to enforce the law. UT called somebody who would. Will Trump be allowed to have a rally on the steps of the Capitol? Doubtful, but not my decision.
  2. This. A "peaceful" protest, the end result of which was the US Capitol was taken over by a violent mob that assaulted uniformed police officers, and openly sought to apprehend elected government officials. These is a place for everything. Not every place is for everything. Isn't that what witnesses say before things went to shit? It happens somewhere damn near every day. Kids in flip flops protesting? Who cares. Masked people with backpacks protesting? hummm? What's up with that? A large group, students and masked individuals, protesting "against" the most persecuted group of people in the history of the world? Prudent to err on the side of caution. You can say that, after the fact. No way you could guarantee that before it happened. Charles Whitman was a MODEL citizen, until he "occupied" the UT Tower and killed and wounded almost 50 people. Blacklab is moderating a message board. Give him a fucking break. This is a volatile topic that is not borderline CR, it is very much right down the middle CR. Take the CR to the CR, and have at it. Most of the posts here are inflammatory rhetoric, not factual information. Blacklab has deleted my posts that I knew were too heavy CR, and they should have been deleted. I posted them knowing that, I exercised my rights, and Blacklab did the same. I repectfully disagree. Allowing unlawful assemblies of large groups of people, students or otherwise, is putting people and property at risk. Was the protest peaceful? Yes. Was there a significant probability it might not be peaceful? Yes, given what has transpired across the country the past few months. Does the UTPD have adequate resources to "control" the number of people that gathered? IDK, but I'm betting they don't. (One would thing the US Government could protect the Capitol, who knew?) Could this unlawful protest have gone off the rails and become more unlawful to the detriment of all involved? Absolutely. Allowing an unlawful assembly with the potential to take over the university, shut it down, and reduce it to an online educational platform is unacceptable. That is one step removed from just shutting down the university. People protest, get arrested, get released. Some cheer, and others complain. No biggie. The only difference is people bring guns and bombs with them now.
  3. Ukraine is fighting to exist. I'm sure they're fighting by the rules. To be clear, Ukraine targeted Russian oil terminals this week, NOT the oil refineries. The only thing in common is the word oil. Huge, huge difference on the longer term impact of each. Ukraine targeted the Yartsevo Oil Terminal, Smolensk on 4/23/24 and the Talashkino Oil Terminal on 4/24/24. These are not refineries, they are terminals or depots, a series of storage tanks and a means to load/unload railcars and tanker trucks for further distribution. Both of these terminals/depots have smallish storage tanks, less than 50 ft in diameter, (~ 17,500 bbl each, or ~750,000 gallons). Chicks dig the long ball, the media likes big fires. Though the tanks are relatively small, they make big fires, and always make the news, because the news moves oil prices. Yartsevo Oil Terminal, Smolensk Talashkino Oil Terminal This is a screenshot of the Lukoil - Nizhny Novgorod Refinery (~ 340,000 bbl/day) that Ukraine attacked on 3/12/24. This is similar in size to the Conoco Westlake Refinery (~ 250,000 bbl/day) north of I-10 in Lake Charles. There are multiple, individual process units within the refinery, that are related, yet distinct in what they do. The footprint of the Lukoil Refinery is over 5 square miles. Much different than the oil terminals/depots. The largest tanks at Lukoil are ~ 200 feet in diameter, (~ 400,000 bbl each, or ~17,500,000 gallons). That is ~ 1 days production from the refinery. You take out a few tanks, and you burn up a few days production. If you take out the refinery towers, which Ukraine did target the last few months, that is a much different issue. While the refinery has multiple units, the big "crackers" at the start of the refining process may process ~ 30-70% of the refineries capacity. I'm a gas processing guy not oil refining guy, so take this with a grain of salt. US processing facilities are automated to the point that the most things are controlled from a central control from, or a series of control rooms. You look at a screen, you flip a switch or select an icon, and a valve opens or closes, and you move on to the next thing. (When you do routine maintenance, you physically make sure valves are closed, and you chain them so they can't be opened. - Safety First). Automation and centralized control works very well, until someone starts lobbing rockets and missiles at you.) The Russian facilities built by US companies, Sakhalin Island LNG for example, formerly Exxon operated, now Russian, would have state of the art automation. The traditional Russian oil facilities are probably similar in nature to their military equipment, cars, and toilets. Regardless of the technology involved, damaging a refinery has much more effect that simply hitting some storage tanks. Russian oil production is key contributor to the world market. Russian refinery production, not so much. As long as the production makes it into the market place, with or without sanctions, the world oil price is moderated. The Arab oil embargo quadrupled world oil prices, Russia-Ukraine raised them ~ 20%. If Russian oil production was shut off, whole different ball game. Russia is not a big exporter of refined products. Damaging their refineries is much more localized for Russia and not so much the larger marketplace. This impacts Russian's war effort without much impact on others. I would think some of these distinctions played a part in green lighting the longer range weapons that are on the way to Ukraine.
  4. A nugget from my Google News feed ... (can do you unwind a click algorithm?) Gig Em Gazette So, "the top line talent in the receiving room is second to none", and the "need at receiver showed up big time in the spring game." "Noah Thomas' amazing play" - the ball clearly hits the ground. Bryce Foster? FAFO.
  5. FIFY. We need to reduce consumption. There is not a source of fresh water source that can meet the demand. Aquifers are viewed as fresh water oceans; they not. They are static filtration systems with long term, multi year cycle rate. If you shorten the cycle, the water you put in is the same water you take out; unfiltered water. Once we have abundant, cheap energy ..., wake up, you're late for work. It costs what it costs, impacted by inefficiencies in politics, and physics. One is easier to fix than the other. There is a fundamental reason the south was sparsely populated til the 60's, AIR CONDITIONING. A/C follows air and water to sustain life. People tend to settle in places with running water. There is not enough running water between Dallas - Austin-San Antonio to "support" the current demand. Water for drinking is an absolute. Water for recreation and irrigation, and industrial consumption is not. It should be priced accordingly.
  6. The Kazan Aircraft Production Plant in Gorbunov, Tatarstan is 600+ miles/1,000 kilometers from Ukraine held territory.
  7. I did a quick wiki search for my comments. I know we get the remnants from East Texas, Northern Mexico and Pacific Coast storms. I don't wish misery or harm on anyone, but I like the Thunder in my Creek.
  8. I bought Thunder Creek Ranch in 2002, NW of Utopia and west of Medina. A series of tropical storms had dumped ~ 17" of rain over a few weeks that summer and it looked like a tropical paradise. Thunder Creek was the appropriate name for the area, then. I've learned It usually takes a hurricane/tropical storm weather event for Thunder Creek to Thunder, and sadly, those seem to be fewer occasions than when I roamed the 40 acres. Muck like the levels of Lake Medina. Texas has been "hit" by 46 hurricanes/tropical storms since 2000, but only 5 have made landfall between Corpus Christi and Brownsville; Generally, anything east and west of that corridor doesn't impact central Texas, including Utopia and Austin. August 9, 2002 – Tropical Storm Bertha makes landfall as a tropical depression near Kingsville, August 16, 2007 – Tropical Storm Erin makes landfall near Lamar July 23, 2008 – Hurricane Dolly makes landfall at South Padre Island September 8, 2016 – The remnants of Hurricane Newton bring heavy rains to parts of western Texas Late August 2017 – Hurricane Harvey makes landfall on San José Island near Rockport The occasional rain shower keeps things green, but it takes a series of wet years to keep the springs recharged, and the surface water is dependent on consistent localized rainfall, or a named storm. There is no "normal" weather pattern, just the length of time between the transitions of flooding and drought. It is amazing how different the weather is in the country v. Austin, ~ 113 miles as the crow flies. Big difference between the radiant heat sink generated by all the concrete, asphalt, cars and the millions of 98 degree meat popsicles around town and the open country with zero impervious cover. The people are different too. Nobody complains about the water levels while they are sitting in their swimming pools watching the sprinklers watering the grass.
  9. Now that I finished my "No Nukes" No CR rant... The Netflix Series, "Turning Point: The Bomb and the Cold War", is worth watching. Heavy CR slant to the dialogue, but the "factual"nuggets were very informative. The last few episodes are very topical. Simply labeling Putin as a KGB honk is misleading; His early years with a front row seat to the Berlin Wall coming down and the unraveling of the Soviet Union was much more impactful. His long term ties to the St. Petersburg mafia and the oligarchs provides a much better understanding of who and what he is and of the recent history with Ukraine. One thing doesn't change. Putin is pure evil and must be stopped.
  10. You sir, fucked up the most informative thread on this board. Please take your high school debate back and forth opinions and keep them to yourself, and off of this board. Thanks. Ukraine is fighting the same fight that my father, and you, and many before and after him fought, at a cost of maybe 2 cents on the dollar, without putting any American lives at risk. However, they are not fighting for the same things we fought for, they are fighting to simply exist. Thanks. Putin is the worst of humanity, on steroids, with ill gotten wealth that would make the titans of capitalism blush, and nukes. If it doesn't end here, it doesn't end. Thanks. This used to be the first thread I read every morning. The last few days have been brutal, and disappointing. Thanks. War is political. End of story. The self policing and keeping this thread on topic and void of CR has been admirable, until the past few days and weeks. Please don't fuck it up. Thanks. We all have questions. Perhaps some questions are better for Google, before they get asked here. I ask them here because I appreciate that so many of you have forgotten more about more things than most will ever know. I like this place because it usually provides the answers before the questions are even asked. You know who you are. Thank you. Slava Ukraini
  11. Hard to find any good news from Ukraine, so I'll settle for bad news from Russia. The flooding in Russia is not because of a "dam failure", but appears to be from the volumes of water flowing through the creeks and rivers and over the dikes, dams, and whatever else is in the way. Reports of water at ~ 10 meter levels (32 feet) proximate to 16 foot levees means there is 16 feet of water flowing over the top. The widespread flooding spans an area and different river systems from Sorochinsk to Kurgan, ~ 540 miles. The pitiful response from the state will not improve, as there does not appear to be any significant resources available, and the flooding situation will get worse before it gets better. The flooding in Orsk, just north of Kazakhstan, is not coming from the Ural River that traverses east to west, but from the Yelshanka River, directionally northwest of the city. In the second video below, at the 09 second mark, you can see the monument in Gagarin Square, with the flood water coming towards the front of the monument, which faces Northwest. It is shown in the Google Earth screen shot. In the screenshot below, everything (~ 25 square miles) between the 638' elevations north and south of the Ural River, including the Gagarin Monument, is probably under water. The residential area doesn't have high rises, just a shit load of high density single family dwellings. (The lots are ~ 30 ft x 100 ft). The numbers of flooded homes, ~ 10,000?, in Orsk alone, is going to cause a shit storm, literally (Ha! Ha!), that won't go away. There's not a FEMA bailout on the horizon. One official proposed ~ $108/month for 6 months as compensation. Another said "he should be on vacation, not here." If your home is trashed and you have no place to go, how much do you care about going to work? Or going to Ukraine to be a meat popsicle? Worker productivity at the industrial facilities is going to be impacted, but to what degree? In a few days or weeks, this won't just be a few people in front of city hall complaining. I'm hoping this energizes and mobilizes the masses like never before err ..., nothing since 1917. Too bad it's in the middle of bum fuck no where. Corruption, meet Karma. One can only hope.
  12. I did not get tickets and had 51 points.
  13. “just throwing it and hoping for the best.” This year, the last 3 quarters v. OU and 1st half against Hou, QE completion rate was 90+ %. There are numerous throws he made as the receiver was coming out their break, where he anticipated where the receiver would be and delivered a perfect throw in stride. Can he improve? Certainly. But there was nothing close to Mike “find the ball and go up and get it” Evans on the Texas roster the last 2 years. Fuck that hoping the best bs. His anticipating and missing has as much to do with the receivers be off schedule as much as it has to do with the throws. Maybe he could wait another 2/10ths of a second before throwing it. Maybe is doesn’t want to chance a 250 lb meat head driving him into the ground because of a weather vane whiff by the OL. QE throws as catchable ball as well as anyone QB I’ve ever seen.
  14. INTERVIEW ANTONY J. BLINKEN, SECRETARY OF STATE CHIEF OF MISSION RESIDENCE PARIS, FRANCE APRIL 2, 2024 Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Darius Rochebin of LCI/TF1 QUESTION: Good evening, Mr. Secretary of State. Antony Blinken, you’re head of U.S. foreign policy. First, Ukraine’s cry for help. Is the United States in a position to promise that the Ukrainian state, that Kyiv, will never fall into Russian hands? SECRETARY BLINKEN: I am convinced we already have. In other words, it is not happening, it’s never going to happen. At the beginning of the Russian aggression in 2022, we thought there was a possibility that Kyiv would fall. But thanks to the incredible resistance of the Ukrainian people, and thanks also to the support given to Ukraine by the United States, France and other countries, Putin’s desire to conquer the whole country, to wipe it off the map, to make it part of a greater Russia, has not materialized and it won’t. QUESTION: Mr. Zelenskyy said: “We’re not 100% sure that Putin won’t use nuclear weapons.” And he added, “That’s what makes President Biden cautious.” Do you, indeed, have to take that risk into account? SECRETARY BLINKEN: From the start, from day one, President Biden was convinced of two things: that we had to do everything possible to support Ukraine, because the aggression against Ukraine was not just an aggression against the Ukrainian people and against the country, but against all the basic principles of the international system. But he was also convinced that we had to avoid a war with Russia. QUESTION: A nuclear escalation? SECRETARY BLINKEN: An escalation, whether conventional or nuclear. And so, since then, he’s been leading with great clarity in this direction: supporting Ukraine but avoiding a war with Russia. QUESTION: It’s not just theoretical. Don’t we remember the warning that went out about a possible use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine? If that were to happen, would the United States respond? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Look, I’m not going to get into hypotheticals. There was indeed a moment when there was fear. I think that — QUESTION: (Inaudible) there were concrete messages to that effect. SECRETARY BLINKEN: All I can say is that there was a fear that it was possible. But I think the Russians heard not only from the United States, not only from France, but from many other countries, including China, that a nuclear weapon should absolutely not be used. QUESTION: But in principle, Mr. Secretary of State, compared to the use of conventional weapons, would the slightest nuclear use, even tactical weapons, be a complete change? SECRETARY BLINKEN: For us, it would be a complete change, yes. QUESTION: With consequences for Russia? SECRETARY BLINKEN: With consequences. But we’re doing everything, of course, to avoid this possibility and to avoid a war, a bigger war. But at the same time, we absolutely must support Ukraine, because the Russian aggression continues to this day, it continues to do appalling damage within Ukraine, and it continues to present a danger not only to Ukraine, but to Europe as well. QUESTION: The Balts are expressing their fear of a more conventional war. It would be a Russian incursion into the Baltic territories and, as in Crimea in 2014, a fait accompli. Would the United States militarily prevent it this time? SECRETARY BLINKEN: You know, we have an exceptional asset, which is NATO. And the basic idea of NATO is that an attack on one NATO member is an attack on everyone. QUESTION: Article 5. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Article 5. And I don’t think it’s in Mr. Putin’s interest to widen the conflict, especially with or against a NATO member. QUESTION: Mr. Blinken, do you understand that this is the crucial question – for the Balts, in particular? Can they be assured that even one foot of a Russian soldier on Baltic territory would lead to a military response from the United States of America? SECRETARY BLINKEN: A millimeter or a centimeter. For us, Article 5 is essential. QUESTION: With a military reaction? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Again, I won’t go into specific hypotheses, but I think that any adversary who is aggressive against a NATO member knows that he will get a response from NATO, including the United States. QUESTION: That’s you. If it’s Mr. Trump, does that change? SECRETARY BLINKEN: You know, all I can do is manage today and do the best I can with all my colleagues. The future — QUESTION: But do you understand, excuse me, Mr. Secretary of State, the fear of Europeans who wonder, ‟If Mr. Trump is there, there may be a disengagement from NATO?” SECRETARY BLINKEN: I hear fears coming from my colleagues, from my fellow citizens, but, you know, there are often fears when there are changes in democracies, whether it’s the United States, whether it’s France, whether it’s any democratic country where there’s a change of government every four years, every six years or whatever, there’s always something, because of course you get used to what you’ve got. You don’t know what’s coming next, but what I can tell you is that this year will mark 75 years of NATO, 75 years of American administrations, Republicans and Democrats, supporting NATO. I’m convinced that it will continue, no matter what. QUESTION: You have helped Ukraine powerfully. You rule out – that’s clear – American troops in Ukraine, don’t you? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Yes. QUESTION: However, what happens if the French – Mr. Macron has said, “it’s not out of the question” – the Finns, the Poles go for it. It’s their choice. Will it require a NATO consensus? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Again, I stay away from making hypotheses for the future. Our policy is clear. President Biden’s policy is clear. There will be no American troops on Ukrainian soil. QUESTION: Why not? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Because for us, it’s something that will lead closer to a direct conflict with Russia, which we want to avoid. It’s not in our interest and it’s not in the interest of the Allies. But at the same time — QUESTION: Excuse me. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Go ahead. QUESTION: Would it be like a stab in the pact since, let’s say, the Cold War when there’s been no direct confrontation between the two nuclear powers, for ground troops to take place? SECRETARY BLINKEN: For us, it’s a matter of national interest. It’s not in our interest to have a direct conflict with Russia. I don’t think it’s in the interest of any of the NATO members. But at the same time, there is a determination, a conviction that we must do our utmost to support Ukraine, and do so not only this year, but in the years to come. Because the real danger – there is an immediate danger on the ground – but the greatest danger is the idea that may be in Putin’s head, that he can outlast us, that we’ll end up fading away, whether it’s us, Europe or the other partners. I think it’s essential to convince Putin that this won’t be the case. QUESTION: But, Antony Blinken, once again, if the French also go, the Finns, the Poles, etc., is it at our peril or do you think it will involve NATO? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Everyone must make decisions on a national level and on an Alliance level too. QUESTION: Will the Alliance have to come to an agreement? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Again, I won’t go into hypotheticals, but I know very well that, with the relations we have within the Alliance, the relations we have directly with France, everything we do, we do together. We talk about it, we discuss it, and we decide together. QUESTION: In Brazil, President Macron raised the possibility of Vladimir Putin taking part in the next G20 meeting, provided, he said, that it would be useful and that there was a consensus among all G20 members. Do you see this as a possibility, under these conditions? SECRETARY BLINKEN: If there’s a consensus among all the members and if it’s useful, yes. In the current situation, it’s hard to see how it could be useful and how there could be a consensus among all the members — QUESTION: For you, would a Putin-Biden handshake be conceivable, provided, of course, that it was useful? SECRETARY BLINKEN: The idea has never been to exclude Russia or Mr. Putin. It’s the actions, it’s the policy of Russia and of Mr. Putin that triggers what happens in terms of Russia’s relations with the G20 or with the G7, with the world. So, if policy changes, we don’t rule anything out. The problem is that we don’t have any proof, for the moment, that policy is changing. QUESTION: But if the policy changes, can we talk to Mr. Putin again very directly, even at a summit? SECRETARY BLINKEN: I hope there will be a day, and I hope that day will come sooner rather than later, when relations between our countries and Russia will be quite different from the current one. Unfortunately, that’s not the case, and it’s not the case because of Mr. Putin’s policies. QUESTION: So, to be perfectly clear, he’s not a pariah forever? Not necessarily? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Russia is not a pariah, and for us, it’s not so much the individuals, the personalities, that count, it’s the policy pursued by a country.
  15. We walked across on the bridge in February. I weighed 150 lbs dripping wet, wearing a ski parka that caught a lot of wind. Self preservation is strong with me. Too much good terra firma around not to have it under my feet.
  16. I did an Expert Witness Report regarding business interruption insurance on an offshore drilling rig. They claimed damages for a well that was never drilled. Should have been a slam dunk. The attorneys said the insurance "people" would never show up to testify. They "earned" ~ $350,000 for the commissions (2005) on the policies and would never do anything to jeopardize their livelihood. The Gateway Arch in St. Louis can move as much as 18". The slight movements at the top give the appearance of a much larger movement at the bottom, 600 ft below. Looking straight down, you could see the sidewalk underneath the Arch, and then it would disappear, and then it would reappear. And then we were done, and left. The egg shaped tram that toggles back and forth on the way to the top of the Arch is not for the faint of heart. It took a few days to clear all the reservations at the Holiday Inn.
  17. I remember picking up my Norwegian au pair at the airport, saw this statuesque blond goddess walking towards us, holy fuck!!! She was walking next to my au pair. A few months later, was with my friend at a beer & pizza joint in Boulder, and in walked a pack of 10-12 au pairs, from Norway, Sweden, Germany & Spain. Got home at 5 in the morning. Wife was sitting at the table drinking coffee. "Where the hell have you been!!!" "With Laila and her friends?" "Doing what?"
  18. "Galloping Gertie" We were at the top of Pikes Peak, well above the tree line, and it started snowing, and then thundering, and then lightning, adios!!!. On the way down, the snow turned to sleet and an icy, slushy mix was covering the road. Nobody said a word on the way down. White knuckle city! In HS, I drove my friends Chevelle down the hill on 2222, ~ 150+ MPH, used 3 of the 4 lanes to make the turn at the bottom. Item #34 of stupid shit I did and why I'm lucky to be here. Moore's Crossing over Onion Creek, Elroy, Texas (Richard Moya Park) Built in In 1915, 3 of the 6 spans from the 1884 iron Congress Avenue Bridge were used to construct the bridge. It had a wooden deck, and squeaked when you drove across it; sounded like it was falling apart.
  19. The house is in Longmont, CO, not Boulder. Longmont is to Boulder as Hackensack is to Manhattan. "The only thing I like about New Jersey is the view it has of Manhattan." The City of Boulder created a 5 mile buffer between Boulder, and the rest of the world. Longmont is outside of the Open Space. You can see the tops of some of the CU buildings right at the base of the mountains. With that said, playing golf in Longmont gives you a reason to take your eyes off the ball. The view of Long's Peak and the throat of Rocky Mountain National Park is spectacular. Re: Deion The first time I heard of him, it was a clip of him lounging in a car, with is sun glasses and his bling, talking about me, me, me, and shit about everybody else. Fuck that POS. But, his ratio of talking the talk to walking the walk is the benchmark. Most exiting player I've ever watched. Too bad for his sons. Alligator mouth. meet humming bird ass.
  20. Time to replace your thermostat. The thermostat should open when more heat is needed, and open only enough to control the temperature at a specific set point.
  21. Agree 100%. Sark asked and answered his own question, "What is the biggest difference between the B12 & SEC?". DL, which everybody already knows. The Big 12 has 1st round NFL DL every year, and they scheme for them when they play them. The SEC has NFL DL across the board, every week, and having multiple high end players is more difficult to scheme against. DL is the only real ??? this year, and with what is already campus, Texas is top half, maybe top quarter of the SEC, behind Georgia and Alabama. Improvements at Edge, LB and DB should help the DL. Other than DL, Texas is pretty damn solid. Texas made a lot of Alabama's NFL 1st & 2nd rounders look very pedestrian last year. No reason to expect this year to be any different.
  22. Ukraine does not have enough artillery and offensive weapons to fight the fight they were fighting a year ago. When the US was leading an international wave of support for Ukraines defense, Ukraine towed the line (US preference) on hitting "military targets." Ukraine systematically targeted the smallish fuel depots and terminals close to the front lines and stayed away from the the heart of the energy complex, the refineries themselves. Basically, Its okay to fight back against Russia, as long as gasoline prices in the US stay within an acceptable range. Yeah, I know we sanctioned Russia's petroleum and refined product exports (wink. wink.), but its keeping the US in their comfort zone. Now, Akash Maniam, MD 🇺🇦 @ManiamAkash "Ukraine's fighting an existential war and the US is playing politics in an election year. What an utter farce." Ukraine cannot adequately defend themselves, much less prosecute a war effort that allows them to reclaim there Country. With the US sitting on their hands watching from the cheap seats, Ukraine is fighting the only war they can, which is directionally to cripple Russia's war machine. Period. That would be their energy production. Not storage tanks, but the refineries. Ukraine is fighting for survival. If the collateral damage is rising energy prices Worldwide, ... umm...OK. Now the rest of the world can appreciate what is happening. Oil, and the refined products derived from the production, are a worldwide commodity that is affected my a multitude of factors. This is the issue that drove American & British foreign policy for the past 100 years, to have control, or at least influence, on worldwide oil production. The Shale Revolution allowed the US to become self sufficient in energy production (~ 14 MM bbl/day) for the first time since ... not my lifetime at least? While the US is self sufficient in production, we export 4-5 MM bbl/day and import ~ 2.5 MM bbl/day. We export the lighter shale crude oil, which looks like Quaker State out of the can, and import the heavier, nastier crude oil that looks like Jed Clampett's back yard. The US refining capacity was converted from a light crude slate to a heavy crude slate 20-40 years ago, and that mix is required to maximize the production from US refineries, gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, etc. We import oil, some to balance US demand, and some for the sole purpose of exporting refined products. Odds are the delicate balance between production, refining and consumption is getting ready to be challenged in a way most have not envisioned.
×
×
  • Create New...