Jump to content

Yesh

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    484
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Yesh

  1. In that scenario, it isn't clear which of these is correct. A. No head to head, go to next highest common opponent (ISU), Texas and OU have wins, OSU has a loss, therefore Texas and OU in to the championship with OU the #1 seed due to head to head. B. No head to head, go to next highest common opponent (ISU), Texas and OU have wins, OSU has a loss, then to break Texas and OU use head to head, which makes OU #1 seed, then restart the tiebreaker between Texas and OSU, go to highest common opponent (OU), OSU has a win, Texas a loss, therefore OSU is #2 seed. Scenario B is what Alex Loeb has stated, and it isn't clear whether he got that from the Big 12 or is just assuming. Scenario A makes a lot more sense. Edit: There is a Scenario C (bolded is what is different from Scenario B) C. No head to head, go to next highest common opponent (ISU), Texas and OU have wins, OSU has a loss, then to break Texas and OU use head to head, which makes OU #1 seed, then restart the tiebreaker between Texas and OSU, go to NEXT highest common opponent (Kansas), OSU has a loss, Texas a win, therefore Texas is #2 seed.
  2. It is even funnier when you look at it this way. Record vs Opponent Rank Opponents 1-20 Texas 2-1 A&M 0-3 Opponents 21-40 Texas 3-0 A&M 2-1 Opponents 41-100 Texas 5-0 A&M 2-0 Opponents <100 Texas N/A A&M 3-0
  3. Rankings based on FPI (sorry I know it isn't great but it is easy to find) Record vs Top XX Top 10 Texas 1-1 A&M 0-1 Top 20 Texas 2-1 A&M 0-3 Top 40 Texas 5-1 A&M 2-4 Top 100 Texas 10-1 A&M 4-4
  4. Are we finally seeing Petrino unleashed?
  5. What kind of locker room would Traylor have? Didn't Jimbo allow the inmates to run the asylum? No matter who they hire, it will be better for us if they don't overachieve in the first year, and the best way for that to happen would be for a bunch of guys to portal out because the new coach is a disciplinarian.
  6. How upset would you be if when teams start going HUNH on us with our backups in and get a couple first downs, if one of our players had a cramp or the wind knocked out of them and needed an injury timeout?
  7. To be fair, 378 to 327 to 302 is some sign of improvement.
  8. The flip side is if you end up taking one of those after a month of having no head coach, has half the players portaled out and the recruiting class fallen apart? The firings are happening ealier because you need to get the new guy in their earlier.
  9. Is she mad enough to spill the beans about all of the illegal bags she helped facilitate?
  10. Would any replacement arrive before the end of their season? Or are they going to have an interim for the next couple weeks.
  11. You might even say it is their CFP national championship game.
  12. And Quinn needs to throw it into the stands and take the grounding penalty.
  13. How often are we in a coverage where we have 2 deep safeties that have no other responsibilities than a half field zone? Wouldn't you want some protection if you were going to have your CBs press at the LOS? Don't we usually have our safeties picking up slots/TEs? I mean we could keep our safeties in deep zone, but then we would need our LB/NB to man up inside receivers, which might not be a good idea (I mean LBs, Barron would be fine) and could also affect the run defense.
  14. I applauded the coaching continuity Sark has had so far, but if you were looking at it from a cutting the bottom 10% of performers each year, Joseph/Gideon would be the candidates. Even just asking "is this position group championship level" would still point to the DBs as the biggest liability.
  15. Since the Briles offense is based on simple reads and counting the box, I'm interested to see if we show some light boxes that would trigger a run and then take our chances with our D-line and Ford.
  16. Yesh

    Fuck Big 12 refs

    The missed PI on Worthy was the first WTF moment. That followed by the punt block completely shifted the momentum.
  17. Boy that escalated quickly
  18. No. NO. Fuck no. Go fuck yourself. Fuck OU.
  19. Am I mistaken, or did we see wristbands for the offense in the OU game? I swear I saw them and took note, because when I think of wristbands I think of near the end of the Charlie Strong years when that was the solution to the defense being dogshit.
  20. I suppose rather than discussing it any more or speculating either way, we could just quietly wait until he actually announces in a couple hours.
  21. I don't think I've ever seen Quinn throw it as hard as he can. Arm strength isn't about how fast the ball is going. Being able to throw the ball 40 yards with minimal effort is different than having to put your entire body into it.
  22. Do we have a dime package? I'd like to see a NB on each side when teams go 2x2.
  23. Anyone want to discuss the pros and cons of going to a 3 DL defense against mobile quarterbacks? Coach Erwin on the IT youtube videos has been mentioning it. My understanding is you would be giving up the chance at edge pressure, and would have to be careful about setting the edge against the run, but you could prevent interior gaps for the QB to scramble through, and have a LB close behind the LOS to clean things up in case he did.
  24. No because anyone who is willing to back out of a commitment is by definition a bad person and will be a bust.
×
×
  • Create New...