Jump to content

TotallyLegit

Full Members
  • Posts

    1136
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TotallyLegit

  1. I walked from campus to Leander just to scout a player in person. Then I walked back 12 hours later. I couldn't walk for more than 15 minutes without my knees hurting for like a month after that. True story...except for the "scouting a player" part.
  2. Well, he typed something but then thought better and deleted it...almost entirely. All he sent was "Ex", and despite being an aggy, he usually forms words and sentences.
  3. I just sent this to my aggy brother in law, and based on the reaction, uh, I should probably shut up for a while.
  4. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I didn't think the hole itself was supposed to get erected...
  5. If you walk out of practice whenever you want, you're put at 3rd on the depth chart even if nobody is 2nd. Use marijuana or any other Schedule 1 controlled substance in the locker room, and you're looking at 4th. That's just the kind of disciplinarian Jimbo is.
  6. Rule 4 - Section 30 . Article 2 To establish or maintain legal rebounding position, a player shall not: b. Extend either or both arms or elbows, fully or partially, in a position other than vertical so that the freedom of movement of an opponent is hindered when contact with any of these body parts occurs. d. Violate the principle of verticality (a player is entitled to his/her space that is occupied, plus all vertical space above that player). Omier committed a foul in two different ways before Cunningham could commit a foul. The first action occurred when Omier pushed Cunningham into the restricted area. Not only was his second action a foul despite endangering himself more than Cunningham, but he endangered himself because it was a foul. If he had merely jumped vertically in his own vertical space rather than into Cunningham's vertical space, he would have fallen more safely, if at all. This seems like a clear example of refs misapplying the rules because they don't want to catch heat for calling a foul on the player who is more endangered, even if he put himself in that danger. To those arguing, "the refs always call it this way", then they're always calling it wrong. Also, read some David Hume.
  7. Have we considered getting some sort of nurse NIL collective together? Maybe like a "get your Ear Nose n Throat checked by an End Nose or Tackle!" kinda deal? There's gotta be at least 9 figures in something like that.
  8. I feel REAL bad for the teams in the bottom left quadrant
  9. Assuming you're taking the formation as a given and you mean like an RPO look, I agree, this could be a good call. I think K-State was in man coverage with #2 and #29 blitzing. Sending Sanders to the opposite flat and could have allowed us to option off #29.
  10. But this guy calls it pin & pull, so maybe I'm just being a pedantic asshole.
  11. https://www.surlyhorns.com/board/topic/22304-this-is-who-steve-sarkisian-is/?do=findComment&comment=4794650
  12. Nine-man box aside, I'm not sure it was a terrible call so much as a call that K-State made sure to not allow to succeed in the second half, since our longest play of the game came on this call in the first half, and the formation and short motion by Sanders are very conspicuous. Though I'd prefer counter or split zone if they're going to overload the side that our TE is on. It's also curious that we had 11 personnel out there when we pretty clearly wanted to run the ball. Once K-State overloaded the TE side, our options for checking to another run were somewhat limited.
  13. Except AJ Milwee knows that it's not pin and pull...
×
×
  • Create New...