Jump to content

CoachTex

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    936
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CoachTex

  1. Bumping this thread to see if I can get any current actionable intell. Trip planned for Week 3 of June. What are current crowds like, are shuttles running, What is still closed? Also trying to hit up Page, Antelope canyon. Thank you in advance.
  2. He went to aggy. He was obviously a 12 star.
  3. Rumor has it that Northside will split and send 2 schools to Northeast district.
  4. She should have gotten off the cooler the 1st time he asked for a beer.
  5. I know for this year he is back. Was talking about down the line.
  6. Boulware would also be insurance for Drayton if he splits. If true, great hire.
  7. So were are just waiting on DL and TE coach.
  8. So who are the NSD-2 targets besides Collins?
  9. Damn I'm all fucked up. Didn't realize Sweat was that big. Definitely a 3tech. Maybe omojo and Warren at 6 tech. Coburn would definitely need a sub.
  10. Good point. We all agree fundamentals need to be taught and let them play.
  11. I like Coburn at 1 but sweat is athletic enough to play the 6 tech sde.
  12. When you say cover 1, do you mean man free or cover 0 with no free safety?
  13. With a 4 man front DT and Nose are 2 different skill sets. Assuming it is a gap defense, my opinion is Coburn's quickness fits nose. Grahm and ojomo are 3 tech or dt. 5 tech is ossai 6 tech strong side not sure.
  14. Ossai is a much better 5 tech weak side end In4-2-5. Pure pass rusher.
  15. That was kind of my point. 4-3 against spread is problematic with what is asked of OLB and what we have on roster. 4-2-5 is a much easier fit with the nickel being a more hybrid backer.
  16. Im okay with Ash if it is a 4 down with true edge from d-line. You can only play qtrs if you have some stud olbs. They have to not only take away hook curl but also float to the flat and be involved in edge run as the alley runner. Probably more of a 4-2-5. Now the OC is probably won't be announced until after NS1.
  17. So are you saying we go from a fohawk to the inverse?
×
×
  • Create New...