Jump to content

ABSR

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    3239
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ABSR

  1. Extras is no deal Dick barely tolerated Only Slam he gets
  2. That is what I meant by "cement pond measurements". Jethro supervised and approved.
  3. But isn't it really a major in Barista with a minor in Art History?
  4. Fixed it.
  5. And somehow this will make you the inconsiderate asshole in this entire process.
  6. Inconsiderate Asshole!
  7. In Mom’s offense, every parent there did the same thing for their kid including the one with the upset. You shouldn’t be a “good” loser, but you also shouldn’t be a bad loser.
  8. Based on Dahobbs first response and link/article to my post it seems to indicate that what Zeihan said and what I posted was incorrect. It does not appear that the actual flight activity supports what Zeihan said and I posted. If there is other firm data backing up the claim I am happy to have it, but I don’t want my post to be a source of misinformation.
  9. Peter Zeihan has a short input on this. He doesn't say whether Lab or non-Lab....but the most interesting point is at the end of his video where he states the following which I believe is correct. His summarized statement: Regardless of how/why the viral pathogen started, the Chinese knew that in Wuhan they had an issue and they canceled all domestic flights in and out of Wuhan. HOWEVER, they did not cancel international flights out of Wuhan. So knowing they had a viral pathogen outbreak they acted to limit the spread inside of China and by intentional omission/inaction acted to have it spread outside of China. Maybe his facts are incorrect about the flights/dates, but whether I believe his analysis on issues he is usually fairly factual. https://zeihan.com/covid-what-really-happened-in-wuhan/
  10. That's back when you could get "Flesh" and "Indian Red" colored crayons.
  11. And that group of volunteers who were not good enough for Men's D1 ball beat her team almost all of the time per the reports.
  12. That guy has no sense of humor...or humerus.
  13. I'd need to know what type of tree was his picture taken in front of before I made a decision.
  14. Could we piggy back on this and get underground Gondolas approved as well?
  15. That’s a lot of words just for you to tell us you consider $20 to be $20 whether you are in the city or the country.
  16. So same assholes, but different accents! Kind of like here.
  17. Zeihan had a report on China which is an interesting comparison. Per below China's census said 1.41Billion people but people believe that is 130 million too high. Lot's of reasons but Zeihan had said a driver was that regions/areas got funding and paid based on population, so creating fake excess kids/people drove funding. Zeihan's other point was that based on the reasoning/timing for the over counting that this 130M people all fall within the younger (baby to early adult) demographic, which is the most important for both future population growth and having jobs and driving the economy. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/china-2020-census-inflates-population-figures-downplays-demographic-challenge-by-yi-fuxian-2021-08 So we know Russia will lie about everything to make themselves look better. And if they had reasons to encourage regions/people to inflate births/population then we know that they likely did so. And, the "age" of this paper population would likely be 0-30 range. So we don't know for sure, but if someone in Russia could falsify something in order to get paid for it by the state, well that is almost expected.
  18. ...and PBS.
  19. Yes, but it looks like the guy is taking watches and wallets. Not ammo and rations.
  20. The video menu or the “How to prepare Humans” menu?
  21. Some of you assholes must have some really small dicks.
  22. Again?
  23. She doesn't get naked? Well, what we have here is a failure to communicate!
  24. Switch it to one of the Waze female voices so that she will believe the directions. No more Waze Mansplaining for her!
  25. That article is a pay/subscription site so I can't read it, if someone wants to post then we can look in more detail. However, your statement about this as evidence and no Russian involvement seems is based on this statement: "New intelligence reviewed by U.S. officials suggests that a pro-Ukrainian group carried out the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines last year, a step toward determining responsibility for an act of sabotage that has confounded investigators on both sides of the Atlantic for months. " So "new intelligence reviewed by U.S. officials"....Let's say that Russia sent false "intelligence" or reporting and do you know what we do with that. We review it. All sources and their individual reports are given levels of confidence. But all are reported and all are read and true or not they provide insight. Need to read the article but does it say U.S. intelligence agencies (named agencies) state that they believe Pro-Ukrainian elements are to blame? My guess is it doesn't. So what we likely have here is Russia or pro-Russian sources sending information to various intel agencies, then leaking or having someone leak that this intelligence exists to a press member who is happy to get a headline story with no work/validation required. Is it real, fact based....well, based on Russia I would say no. But definitely not definitive if it is just "reviewed intel". But again, the article is behind a paywall/subscription wall. But I did work for awhile in the Intel community.
×
×
  • Create New...