I just don't think you know what words (objective/subjective/cult) mean. If you look at Texas' QB performance by history, QE is third in passing TDs and Yards, and 3rd and 4th in single season passing yards. While these are bumped by the number of games, they are also reflective of his injuries, odd route to Texas QB and yet it still indicates he was hardly holding back the offense. These are stats that are objective. Could he have been better, and not forced some throws in certain situations when a better option was available? Absolutely. Do I doubt you can think of 5 of them? Nope. Can you think of 5 great plays he made? I am sure you can.
It actually seems like you are projecting quite a bit especially regarding the use of cultish terminology. You refuse to recognize the reality that QE was a very good Texas QB, and I think this stems back from the days when Xavier Worthy was giving up and playing below his capabilities and a few of us, pointed that out, and all you could do was to criticize the QB for Worthy's shortcomings. This seemed to really irk you and you really just doubled down on the QE hate very oddly. I mean if he ran over you dog, I could understand, but this is so weirdly personal for you.
And yes, while the 2009 offensive line was poor relative to the senior laden team that won it all a few years before, there were years later I wished for a squad that competent. Yes, against elite guys like N. Suh, they were completely overwhelmed, but against average linemen they could perform to some degree, and Colt was capable of overcoming some of their challenges. At the time I couldn't imagine a shittier line, but then I witnessed Chris Jones spin around and fall down multiple times without a defensive player paying him any mind. But they (2009) were part of the team that got Texas to a shot at a title, save for Colt's injury, they would have left Texas with that title, despite their future outside of the NFL.
But I expect a similar strawman fallacy forthcoming, more false equivalency, and more projection as a response.