Jump to content

ShaggyBevo RIP

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    3760
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ShaggyBevo RIP

  1. The question to me is is RU testing NATO resolve or trying to provoke NATO direct involvement as selling the home crowd RU was defeated by NATO/the decadent west is easier than explaining how UKR defeated RU.
  2. Funny to see all the bots suddenly posting in this thread peddling RU deniability. Weird that TWO missiles had the same issue
  3. Mariupol is more of a pile of rubble than a city at this point.
  4. You don’t have take Mariupol just cut the supply lines from there. If RU can’t keep Crimea is there any purpose to having Mariupol if UKR isn’t going to allow shipping in and out? What troops are in Crimea? Aren’t the RU forces mostly in Donbas regions and Zaporizhzhia?
  5. Keep in mind Russia’s defense is set for traditional warfare lines of contact. Then if the reports of UKR taking places on the left bank are true those lines aren’t so long and comparatively with no Kerch bridge RU’s are likely longer.
  6. I think UKR is going to bypass all the RU entrenchments and traditional strategy and go straight for Crimea. That cuts off the head/Putin and they can clean up the rest later. Putin’s power/regime is built on wars rebuilding the USSR empire and wouldn’t survive losing Crimea which is his biggest accomplishment.
  7. They don’t need HIMARS support regular artillery can do it from the right bank.
  8. It is actually Mykolaiv Oblast and M777s can provide artillery support from across water. Wonder if they ate trying to lure RU navy out for another attack on it.
  9. Elsewhere it was asked just how many ruzzians drowned today?
  10. Been super busy the last two days. Reading between the lines Is RU actually having D-Day level losses while trying to retreat over the Dnipro?
  11. aggy is terrible on the road and against the run. AU should give Bigsby 25+ carries.
  12. Tech may be able to do that as they are a coaching stepping stone. No coach of the caliber aggy wants to hire would touch the job if aggy did that.
  13. Staying stationary in a harbor is worse than under sail in open waters which is why I’m asking if they can’t sail away.
  14. I thought the more interesting thing was introducing the narrative of they are former Soviets used to the same hardships that we are.
  15. What he actually said was some days we have 100-200 KIA per day. No numbers to that degree have been reported since they got triple 7s and HIMARS.
  16. As a former nuke guy, does the lack of any indication of RU ships booking it out of Sevastopol mean they can’t? Apparently, today’s particular combined asset attack was the first of it’s kind against naval ships at harbor.
  17. Latest speculation is fixed wing aircraft firing HARMS added a fourth element to the attack.
  18. The satellite shots from the day before the attack show subs docked in Sevastopol. RU knows UKR has hit Sevastopol before. Going into Sevastopol suggests RU is running out of naval munitions elsewhere and the ones stockpiled in Sevastopol can’t be shipped over the Kerch bridge to safer harbors to take that risk.
  19. Reading all the chaotic early reports, I’m wondering if it was multifaceted; missiles, air drones, and water drones.
  20. Black Sea Fleet go fuck yourself. Have to think RU has run low on naval munitions and Kerch bridge is such they can’t ship them out of Sevastopol to risk going to Sevastopol to re-arm when UKR has shown the ability to hit the area.
×
×
  • Create New...