Hard to quibble with Ewers' first two seasons where the only real knock on him was his propensity towards injury. I didn't like how we ended the final drive against Washington but hell, we got there and Ewers was a huge part of it. And he started this season well but (again) got hurt. He's been a shadow of himself since coming back. The 2024 version of Ewers, post-injury at least, is barely passable. Sure, we're winning games but that's mostly due to a historically good defense. We normally don't do dick in the second half. I firmly believe that Ewers is broken physically and is probably slightly skittish due to the multitude of injuries over his career and this year in particular.
Does this mean I want to see Arch in there instead? Maybe. Maybe not. Maybe go fuck yourself. I think he'd ultimately do better vs this version of Ewers, which is not anywhere close to the best Ewers has given us in his career. QE had pretty good numbers on the surface in the SEC title game but when we needed him to make a play the most, he wasn't able to do it. At a minimum, I'd like to see Arch get 10-12 meaningful snaps per game moving forward -- at least until Ewers is totally healthy (which I admit don't think will happen again this season).