Everything posted by Dahobbs
-
Hey PK -- What would you say you do here?
Nah, he isn't watching the QB. He is looking straight at the running back from the beginning. That's his man. I think what was said earlier is correct: we expected the RB to chip Taaffe to buy time for McDonald to get over.
-
Hey PK -- What would you say you do here?
That would make sense. Taafe turns as soon as it becomes clear the RB isn't chipping.
-
Hey PK -- What would you say you do here?
Honestly, I think is just an example of outsmarting ourselves with the call. McDonald starts running to the back almost immediately, so I have to think it is his man. The pressure look from Taafe was probably supposed to coincide with McDonald rotating over.
-
Hey PK -- What would you say you do here?
Yeah, this one is on Manny. Look how we play it up top and look how Manny responds once the TE passes the LB. He knows he fucked up.
-
Hey PK -- What would you say you do here?
I'm not entirely convinced Taafe is busting. I think that is what he is being told to do. He is attacking too aggressively (and consistently) for me to think it is purely player error.
-
Doorbell etc. cam system, but NOT a Ring?
Interesting strategy...
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
Why is the name redacted?
-
Arch Manning: Scores every way possible
Watching the replay, it appears to actually be over and past his hands rather than through them. Agree with the Brett Favre-ish analogy, but not necessarily in a bad way. I think Sark would focus on him hitting the corner route that appeared open a moment before he bailed the pocket rather than worrying about that throw.
-
Arch Manning: Scores every way possible
Where do you see him hating on Arch? I don't understand posts like this. You're seeing something that simply isn't there.
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
-
Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
I understand the rule. As Twice indicated, the intent is to identify those sorts of forcible contact that go beyond making a normal football tackle. The examples listed as "indicators of targeting" are meant to be objective indicators of that. I don't think this play qualifies. He didn't lead with his helmet. Contact with the helmet may have been first, but it wasn't because he had his helmet down or out in front such that he was leading with it. His helmet was in a natural position for his body, upright, and his eyes facing forward. If you actually go and look at the NCAA's example books, that sort of play is specifically called out as not targeting. I think the closest indicator the play qualified for is "launching," but even then it wasn't a particular clear example of it.
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
-
2025 Random Games thread
LOL
-
2025 Random Games thread
Great job Kansas State. You cost yourself a minute for no fucking reason. Wait until you see his Epstein frequent flyer card.
-
2025 Random Games thread
They are just costing themselves time. Utah is getting a TD here. What, no. Announcers are crazy. You take OT here as the favored team.
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC