Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, TejasPedro said:

Chip Kelly is available could he be brought in to call the offense for Sark? 

No, please no. There are philosophical differences that would prevent that from working out. You can't have two offensive gurus with different ideologies on the same team. All it would lead to is arguing and eventually a splintered relationship. Bring in a young dude who wants to learn. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
1 hour ago, Jkwellborn said:


I think Sark was just setting up a shorter fg after the deep ball didn’t work.

I’m sure he was, but he should have wanted to score a TD. He’s the “best play caller” in the world. He believes it, Texas hired him for it. Throwing once on a pretty mid play call then running twice was what people would want from a Texas team that’s 8-2, 9-1 or 10-0. What does Texas have to lose after losing to Florida? I’ll let it go though, I’m obviously the only one that had a problem with it haha. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

No, please no. There are philosophical differences that would prevent that from working out. You can't have two offensive gurus with different ideologies on the same team. All it would lead to is arguing and eventually a splintered relationship. Bring in a young dude who wants to learn. 

Sark has never not been a play caller. I am not saying it couldn’t work but how would this actually “work?” 

Posted
Just now, WinningIsHard said:

I’m sure he was, but he should have wanted to score a TD. He’s the “best play caller” in the world. He believes it, Texas hired him for it. Throwing once on a pretty mid play call then running twice was what people would want from a Texas team that’s 8-2, 9-1 or 10-0. What does Texas have to lose after losing to Florida? I’ll let it go though, I’m obviously the only one that had a problem with it haha. 

The right decision was made, going for the jugular is going 2 scores early not being a macho moron... this is stadium shit faced drunken fan talk... on a monday morning.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, WinningIsHard said:

From their 35 you’d throw once THEN run twice in a row in an effort to score a TD with two time outs? Texas has a young Superman at qb, not Vince young with his feet but capable of moving the pocket and pushing the arky defense to make a play. I feel like with 3 losses and basically all the sports world talking shit it’s a good moment to remind people Texas is still Texas. Instead we were nervous Arkansas might get the ball back and score. Mack brown played not to lose instead of playing to win plenty of times and it cost Texas several big 12 title appearances and national championship games. To each their own I reckon. 

Lol do you really think, at third and 3, any coach is really thinking "Man, the entire sports world has been talking shit about us. I better go for the touchdown here and remind people that we're still Texas, fuck the first down and fuck clock management"??

Then I can't help you.

Edited by TheBryMan81
Posted
8 minutes ago, TheBryMan81 said:

Lol do you really think, at third and 3, any coach is really thinking "Man, the entire sports world has been talking shit about us. I better go for the touchdown here and remind people that we're still Texas, fuck the first down and fuck clock management"??

Then I can't help you.

ThinkingIsHard

Posted
6 minutes ago, TheBryMan81 said:

Lol do you really think, at third and 3, any coach is really thinking "Man, the entire sports world has been talking shit about us. I better go for the touchdown here and remind people that we're still Texas, fuck the first down and fuck clock management"??

Then I can't help you.

I don’t need you to help me, but the sentiment is nice I guess. The shittiest team in the sec muffed a punt and gave you the ball at the 35 with 50 seconds. Go score a TD, try 3 fuckin times with your all world qb.  Give arch the chance to make it happen. You have your opinion and I have mine. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
Just now, WinningIsHard said:

I don’t need you to help me, but the sentiment is nice I guess. The shittiest team in the sec muffed a punt and gave you the ball at the 35 with 50 seconds. Go score a TD, try 3 fuckin times with your all world qb.  Give arch the chance to make it happen. You have your opinion and I have mine. 

Except this opinion is stupid, now are we stooping for low level micromanaging about individual plays?

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Thatguy said:

No, please no. There are philosophical differences that would prevent that from working out. You can't have two offensive gurus with different ideologies on the same team. All it would lead to is arguing and eventually a splintered relationship. Bring in a young dude who wants to learn. 

Chip would make sark feel threatened.  And chip would not respect sark either 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Thatguy said:

No, please no. There are philosophical differences that would prevent that from working out. You can't have two offensive gurus with different ideologies on the same team. All it would lead to is arguing and eventually a splintered relationship. Bring in a young dude who wants to learn. 

Ok, so status quo from you because you just described Milwee.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, IDIOTsavant said:

Ok, so status quo from you because you just described Milwee.

They just started putting Milwee in the booth since Mississippi State game. At the end of the day, since 2007-2008 he’s been calling plays. Prior to that he worked solely with QBs. I just cannot see him giving up playcalling. He’s given multiple interviews where he said his giving up playcalling wasn’t an option. So I just don’t see it happening. If it’s forced on him, how would that turn out? What would that look like? He knows that the coaching graveyard 🪦 is littered with dual HC/OC types and yet he continues to try and prove he can do both to frustratingly mixed results almost the last 20 years. 

Posted
1 hour ago, linux said:

Except this opinion is stupid, now are we stooping for low level micromanaging about individual plays?

You know where you are, so yes 

  • Haha 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Thatguy said:

No, please no. There are philosophical differences that would prevent that from working out. You can't have two offensive gurus with different ideologies on the same team. All it would lead to is arguing and eventually a splintered relationship. Bring in a young dude who wants to learn. 


The situation you described is literally what happened at Ohio St last year and they won the national championship. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Thatguy said:

No, please no. There are philosophical differences that would prevent that from working out. You can't have two offensive gurus with different ideologies on the same team. All it would lead to is arguing and eventually a splintered relationship. Bring in a young dude who wants to learn. 

Can we just bring Gary Fatterson in as "consultant," but let him take over head coach duties and make Sark effectively the OC?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Newy25 said:


The situation you described is literally what happened at Ohio St last year and they won the national championship. 

Was there a dispute or did Day just step completely back and allow Chip to run the play calling? Cuz that is the only way having a separate person be OC while Sark is HC could actually work. He would have to stay out of it and allow the OC to be OC and sark could then actually spend more time with the defense and special teams, and oversee more of the program's day-to-day functions. It’s how it’s supposed to work. It’s how we have seen successful teams work. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...