Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
31 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Yeah, I don't know. But it's part of the job, and he tried his best. Wish he displayed that much fire and urgency with the other (more important) aspects of being a HC this past season. 

 

 

28 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

As someone mentioned above, it's important to point out the absurdities of the playoff selection "process". 

It’s absurd and every time they trot someone out there to explain it. “Bama played a tough game at Auburn (uh what).” We get this crap as an explanation.
 

By Sunday morning the teams that know they are on the bubble aren’t likely to get in (W/L or SOS or head to head or none of the rivalry games fell the way that was needed.) not saying those teams would do this but I’m a chick I think this way: band together. Make one statement. Say the field should be expanded to 16. The teams on the bubble have their coaches out there in one statement saying they would be willing to play a buy in. Air it that morning. We are willing to play each other for a shot at the dance. While everyone is playing CCG games. Get it out to Fox Sports and ESPN so they can talk it up. 
 

I guess it’s better than seeing what we do each year. It’s a moment without hope. Coaches going out there explaining how absurd it is but they don’t get in. Force their hand. It never helps for the current year. Vandy won’t have another Pavia. Lost year. We are playing our peak football. Lost year, Miami fucking best ND head to head and it doesn’t matter. Miami still has to root for teams to win to still get in. Offer to play a game in their home stadium. 
 

I realize what I wrote is absurd but so is explanation from the committee and there is no oversight. Force their hand and say hey fuckers do you want a badass CFP or not? We are willing to play each other to get in. 
 

listening to committee head talk about this shit is worse. And it’s oh well here’s a bowl game. Nah. Flip the script on them I guess until it’s 16 games with some rules that aren’t fucking subjective to this degree. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

Yeah... Sark making the case publicly forced the CFP committee to answer publicly for their decisions.  The CFP committee looks so bad right now because of those answers that no one cares that Sark looked a little whiny.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
14 minutes ago, Guadaloopy said:

Yeah... Sark making the case publicly forced the CFP committee to answer publicly for their decisions.  The CFP committee looks so bad right now because of those answers that no one cares that Sark looked a little whiny.

The committee looks bad but this year is a lost year for the teams on the bubble that didn’t get in. We will never get that back. Every year there are two or three teams playing some damn good football that don’t get in. Lost year. Everyone sees the absurdity. But it doesn’t help the teams who don’t get in. Fucking committee. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Nicole44 said:

I was speaking from the perspective of if you are explaining you are losing kind of thing. Has anyone successfully politicked  to get in? In all the years of the playoffs has there been a team perceived to be on the bubble who made it in bc of the politicking? 

Nick saban did it the year bama didn’t win their own division and somehow they still made the playoffs. The year prior he said if you don’t win your conference you can’t possibly be good enough to make the playoff to keep Ohio state out and then stood at the same podium and told the media bama is the 4th best team in the country even if they didn’t play for a sec title. 2016 Ohio state made it which pissed saban off and 2017 bama showed saban’s hypocrisy knows no bounds. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, WinningIsHard said:

Nick saban did it the year bama didn’t win their own division and somehow they still made the playoffs. The year prior he said if you don’t win your conference you can’t possibly be good enough to make the playoff to keep Ohio state out and then stood at the same podium and told the media bama is the 4th best team in the country even if they didn’t play for a sec title. 2016 Ohio state made it which pissed saban off and 2017 bama showed saban’s hypocrisy knows no bounds. 

Coaches are interested parties. They'll advocate for whatever advances their interests. It's "hypocritical" in a way, but it's also understandable. 

The CFP Committee, on the other hand, is supposed to be disinterested. Its interests should be the same every season - to put the 12 best teams in the playoff according to the selection rules (5+7). But it keeps changing the criteria and justifications for its choices to suit its own unspoken interests, which is far worse than anything that a coach does. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
28 minutes ago, Park Gothic said:

Coaches are interested parties. They'll advocate for whatever advances their interests. It's "hypocritical" in a way, but it's also understandable. 

The CFP Committee, on the other hand, is supposed to be disinterested. Its interests should be the same every season - to put the 12 best teams in the playoff according to the selection rules (5+7). But it keeps changing the criteria and justifications for its choices to suit its own unspoken interests, which is far worse than anything that a coach does. 

That’s why it would have been interesting if the teams on the bubble that had coaches out there politicking had banded together and presented a proposal for the committee to consider, hey we will play each other for a chance to play into the dance, they’d have to address it. At the very least. Even if they said no. We could offer to host two games this weekend at Texas for the play in teams, we will sell tickets at like $10-20 bucks, whatever the fuck help fans with hotels and what not. They have enough cameras as they routinely have so many damn games every weekend. A network would cover it, winning. Telling the committee they are busted and wrong may make changes for next year but it doesn’t help the bubble teams this year. Forcing a proposal like that down their throats at least addresses the committee absurdity and gives the bubble teams a chance were they all in agreement to “we will play each other to have a shot to play into the playoffs.” Committee likely says no but at least you can get all the sports stations and writers to discuss the proposal as opposed to coaches fighting a losing battle to politick to get in. There was one year I thought Bama had 3 losses and the committee said no. It’s rare but it does happen. 

Posted

My issue with Sark is he is slow to make adjustments, and CLEARLY has his favorite plays that he calls repeatedly throughout a game.

I don't EVER have to see another WR screen.

He gets predictable.  And the better coaches like Day and Smart see it and exploit it.  We have the talent to beat anybody.  We don't have the coach.

I'm hoping he takes the next step in his OWN evolution and wakes up to the fact HE is what is holding this team back

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, hornyjay said:

I don't EVER have to see another WR screen.

WTF?  That's been a pretty productive play on the aggregate for Sark's entire tenure as an extension of the run game and a staple as the screen action sets up a bunch of other things.   Bad take.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Posted
23 hours ago, Skipper said:

WTF?  That's been a pretty productive play on the aggregate for Sark's entire tenure as an extension of the run game and a staple as the screen action sets up a bunch of other things.   Bad take.

I think seeing Wingo trip over his feet repeatedly against the good teams is just bothering my man. 

  • Rage+1 2
Posted

Wingo is fast and great in the open field but has zero contact balance. You bump into him he goes down. Needs leg day all off  season and mix in some yoga classes to get some balance in his life. 

Posted

Inside the five, Sark's offenses have sucked since he's been here.

No elite talent other than QB?

Huh? Wisner is an elite runner and he's going to be playing in the NFL. Three-quarters of the running plays Sark called were either delays straight up the middle or delays to the weak side of the field, i.e. not much running room. Looked more like his run plays were lazily designed to be interchangeable for EITHER the speedy elusive Wisner or the sluggish Baxter.

"I think he abandoned the run more than he should have..."

Are you serious? look no further than the Aggie game. When Sark finally decided to give the running game a chance, the entire complexion of the game changed. We dominated them, and our defense got some much needed rest - just like the days of yore when we stomped pretenders into the ground without any passing. Not saying that's ideal, just that you need a run game. You need balance, and we didn't have it, especially in the games we lost, especially to fucking Florida. Now that could be because the run wasn't working, because Sark really didn't give a damn enough to devise an effective run game for a real star - Wisner.

The new Sark needs to realize just how fucking important the run is going forward.

 

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Irish Wrist Watch said:

Inside the five, Sark's offenses have sucked since he's been here.

No elite talent other than QB?

Huh? Wisner is an elite runner and he's going to be playing in the NFL. Three-quarters of the running plays Sark called were either delays straight up the middle or delays to the weak side of the field, i.e. not much running room. Looked more like his run plays were lazily designed to be interchangeable for EITHER the speedy elusive Wisner or the sluggish Baxter.

"I think he abandoned the run more than he should have..."

Are you serious? look no further than the Aggie game. When Sark finally decided to give the running game a chance, the entire complexion of the game changed. We dominated them, and our defense got some much needed rest - just like the days of yore when we stomped pretenders into the ground without any passing. Not saying that's ideal, just that you need a run game. You need balance, and we didn't have it, especially in the games we lost, especially to fucking Florida. Now that could be because the run wasn't working, because Sark really didn't give a damn enough to devise an effective run game for a real star - Wisner.

The new Sark needs to realize just how fucking important the run is going forward.

 

I have been stanning for Wisner since the end of last year. I think he is a great college RB and I love him. 

Wisner is not an elite RB. 

In his defense, neither is the offense he plays in. 

As for Sark and change, numb nuts was still running 12 man packages against aggie. He can't give them up, he won't. His hand was absolutely forced to play 11 package, and despite it being extremely productive in 11 his dumb ass goes right fucking back to 12. His career at Texas supports the conclusion he always will. 

Coach Swip Swap Swill ain't changing outside of when he is absolutely forced to. Don't be surprised to see Texas come out in 12 package to start the bowl and against OSU next fall. In fact, I'll be shocked if he doesn't. Grateful, but I'll believe it when I see it. 

Edited by BurntEyes
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...