Jump to content

Gatorubet

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    10476
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Gatorubet

  1. it’s hard to count all of the cases I have won by employing the affirmative defense of “scam”…
  2. “Show me on the gag order where it says I can’t say, “corrupt judge”
  3. In that case, may I interest you in an auto repair warranty offer that would be perfect for you?
  4. I’m not sure. But I have a sneaking suspicion that one of those jurors will be able to break the free-dive depth record before this is all over from the practice.
  5. it is confirmed that after the judge dismissed everyone at lunch for the rest of the day - that no one decided to come back to the courtroom just for fun and lingering diaper fumes.
  6. You need to remove the nano bots. Try bleeding yourself and running the blood through one of the really good Brita filters. Like the blue ones.
  7. How many times do we have to tell you that the bond issue is not delaying anything. We understand your fever dream that this is a problem, but even after being told it’s not a problem you insist on saying the bond delays the appeal. Just stop!
  8. if this is accurate, this is a problem for trump. When the prosecutor objects to you telling the jury it is not wrong to try to influence an election, and the judge sustain the objection, it is perceived by the jury as nothing less than Trump’s lawyer lied to me and the judge corrected him. I have always told every witness in every trial or deposition I’ve been in that as we start the proceedings, there is a bucket of credibility filled to the brim that goes with them. when they are found to be lying, the bucket gets kicked over. And usually all of the credibility spills out on the floor. If the jury thinks you are lying, they normally do not care if you are lying 20% of the time or 60% of the time, they know you were lying. I’m not talking about normal memory impaired things like the exact time or day exact words, but I’m talking about lying about important things. You normally either have credibility or you don’t. there is very likely a pattern jury instruction telling the jury that if they find a witness non-credible, they can disregard everything that person says in their testimony. Not 20%, not 40%, but all of their testimony. That seems like a rookie mistake, or something they had to say to please the boss it may be the best thing we have going for us is Trump will direct parts of the trial.
  9. And there may come a time When toes and brain cells are not valued much The Constitution dead and Civil War reward acting as the Doddard’s toughs
  10. I am about done with the drama. Time for President Zelenskyy to cut a deal with Poland that Poland owns Crimea for the next two years In exchange for agricultural advice from Ukraine - with the proviso that it goes back to Ukraine after two years. Everyone but the axis of evil signs declarations recognizing Crimea as Polish territory. after all, Russia and the UN recognize Crimea as Ukrainian before Putin invaded. Poland tells Putin in a letter to get his squatters off Polish land before Polish troops arrive with Polish courts to restore order and resolve ownership disputes. The letter also directs Putin to a NATO article …..and I am sure that the rest of the letter will be interesting.
  11. I am a bit surprised not to see John Carter's name. As much as he features Trump on his mailings, you'd think he'd be first to fall in line. He may have been away campaigning on Barsoom.
  12. No. When the trial has started like this one has, jury selected an opening argument set for Monday, there could be no justification to allow defense council to withdraw while it’s going on. Attorneys do not have the right to unilaterally withdraw whenever they want for whatever reason they want. If the issue is fees not being paid, that is often grounds for withdrawing as a general matter, but it would be a rare court to allow an attorney to withdraw with scheduled pending matters - and really a bizarre albino unicorn event to allow an attorney to withdraw the after trial has begun. The jury would see that negatively. Which is all to say that an attorney does not have a right to likely cause a mistrial for that selfish reason and put everything back at square one. And in this unusual case, when his attorneys accepted representation on a client who has a reputation for not paying attorneys - there is way less reason to grant withdrawal for nonpayment of fees.
  13. I actually don’t think this is the case. I do think that orange shit gibbon is so stupid that he doesn’t realize he is giving tons of ammunition to the prosecutors in his various cases, and the best way for him not to give more incriminating statements is to shut up. He can’t, but that might be why they do not want more public statements.
  14. Living in Alabama brings one closer to shitgibbon awareness.
×
×
  • Create New...