OK, let's take a look:
1) doubling down on rent control, perhaps the most widely panned economic policy besides tariffs,
As already pointed out, rent control is a long established thing in New York City. You say he's "doubling down." What does that mean? More of the status quo?
(2) fully subsidized BMR housing (that’s going at around $1.3m per 1k sq ft unit in SF and DC - I’d assume NYC is the same and they need 1 million units in the next decade. The math doesn’t math.)
Do you know how PPP affordable housing works? If you say "yes" give a brief synopsis (then I'll set you straight)
(3) allowing market rate development only to the extent it is weighed down by interest group concessions to the point it isn’t economically feasible.
Tell me what the 'interest group concessions' are.
************************************************
This below is all opinion or gibberish or both:
My apologies, that was still too much in the weeds, but the upshot is that the progressive approach has a very low likelihood of success because it is simply not realistic regardless of any level of support. More fundamentally, it is not designed to succeed because it is based on a politics of scarcity that favors incumbent residents at the expense of future ones, which is a fair summation of blue city progressive politics overall. I don’t think this scarcity mindset is necessary, so I vote against it. To his credit, Zohran is a very positive guy who, unlike most DSA types, tries to avoid the zero sum class warfare game when it comes to affordability.