Jump to content

chainsaw

Full Members
  • Posts

    9075
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by chainsaw

  1. I agree that a lot of theories can be ruled out based on technological impossibility but at the same time I don't need to know the exact details of how they pulled off the heist, yet. Right now I just want to see all the anomalies investigated. Start with the statistical anomalies (the bullet ballots and other odd patterns) and see where the evidence leads.
  2. It's pretty common knowledge that Trump had been favoring diplomacy over Kurilla's "joint strike" idea. None of the facts on the ground had changed since April. Bibi just lost patience and decided to start a war, which now forces Trump to make a more decisive commitment toward diplomacy or war. For the sake of our troops, we should be hoping he sides with diplomacy.
  3. This is where I am at. Let's look into it more, but for now I'm not convinced.
  4. Yeah I think enrichment must be much more difficult to achieve in practice. The three week timetable probably assumes a bunch of highly improbable events go in Iran's favor. I hate Tulsi but there is no reason to think she was wrong.
  5. Not saying he's lying, but just to shed light on what Israel thinks of him and why he might be more willing to vouch for this "three weeks" timetable https://allisraelnews.com/israel-reportedly-pushes-for-iran-strike-before-pro-israel-us-centcom-chief-kurilla-retires Article is from April 2025
  6. MAGAts alone, yes. But the right wing?The dark money guys? Leonard Leo and Koch Bros motherfuckers? Who see Trump as a useful idiot and MAGA as a means to an end? I think they know how to get it done competently, and to keep the Trump campaign as uninvolved as possible both for plausible deniability and because the more involved they are the more likely one of his incompetent sycophants will fuck it up.
  7. I was making fun of Abrams. You can't criticize someone else for being simplistic about a topic and then, in the same tweet, offer a simplistic analysis on the same topic. I found the hypocrisy amusing. The similarities between Iran and Pakistan are superficial. One is majority Shia, the other is majority Sunni. One has an ongoing territorial dispute with a nuclear-armed neighbor, the other does not. What does Abrahms even mean by "ramped up" or "support for terrorism" here? How does he know that the "ramping up" didn't simply coincide with a global trend? How is he so sure that it was Pakistan's nuclear program that enabled it? Just because I disagree with his analysis (which, yeah, more or less boils down to "Pakistan bad ergo Iran bad") doesn't mean I "stan" for Iran. I just wish we didn't have to deal with a social media environment where a platform like X allows someone to post dogshit takes and get millions of views.
  8. It's "stanning" to not want a hot war in the middle east. Okay buddy. Don't forget who launched the first attack here.
  9. I agree that it's vague, but in this age of political violence and right wing extremism I won't give anyone a hard time about being anonymous. Their evidence boils down to the fact that the results are statistically nonsensical (in their opinion): They were concentrated. Targeted. Specific to swing states and Texas—and specific to Election Day voting. And the supposed explanation? “Her policies were unpopular.” Let’s think this through logically. We’re supposed to believe that in all the battleground states, Democratic voters were so disillusioned by Vice President Harris’s platform that they voted blue down ballot—but flipped to Trump at the top of the ticket? Not in early voting. Not by mail. With exception to Nevada, only on Election Day. And only after a certain threshold of ballots had been cast—where VP Harris’s numbers begin to diverge from her own party, and Trump’s suddenly begin to surge. As President Biden would say, “C’mon, man.” In the world of election data analysis, there’s a term for that: vote-flipping algorithm. I think it should be investigated.
  10. "Don't oversimplify, but Pakistan bad ergo Iran bad."
  11. Charlie Kirk when confident is undefeated
  12. Take it or leave it PHX it don't make a shit
  13. It's fucking insane how many of these little episodes got completely memory holed due to sheer volume
  14. https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114695595047194931
  15. This is who Chuck Schumer is.
  16. Trump does not have the political capital to deploy troops to any country that has not directly attacked America. Even his "mass deportation" is proving to be extremely unpopular.
  17. He's come a long way from doing blackface and having to tolerate Adam Carolla
  18. Is there video of this? I'd love to watch
  19. I want him taken alive but I can tell he's a fucking coward who's going to off himself when he knows he's cornered.
  20. I tend to agree, but he's not the type to do that and because he's not the type to do that the only thing he "should" do is take the call, to prevent the focus shifting to petty drama and away from the victims and bringing the killer to justice.
  21. Aggy confirmed in the parade. sips could never
×
×
  • Create New...