Everything posted by hpslugga
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Neil Young pulled his music because he didn’t want to be associated with a platform that included Joe Rogan in it. It’s absolutely shocking that you’re struggling this badly to understand that he was literally telling them “if you want to have Rogan on your platform, fine, but don’t include me on it as well.”
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Gary was wookin pa nub in awl da wong pwaces
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
FIFY
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Yeah and Martin Cabello would be the secretary of education
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
So you don't know who the planners are, nor who tweeted the video first... and you say this... and this... and this...all as if it was "obviously" a matter of fact. So you don't know who the planners are, you don't know who's behind releasing all these videos, but you know that there's a plan involved and it has to do with "cancelling" him...as if it's all an obvious matter of fact. You don't know who released it, yet you know why they did it... Ok.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Even if you totally cast aside what @Mdhorn just said, who are the planners and what is the plan?
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Right, but did you tell someone who was an expert in their field that s/he was a dumbass idiot retard that didn't know what the fuck they were talking about when they clearly did and you clearly didn't? "Asshole" doesn't accurately describe that. That's what I'd call "ultracrepidarians with an attitude."
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
It has nothing to do with alignment, and if you weren't so caught up in this transparent display of binary thinking and projecting that mentality onto others, you'd have caught onto that. You'd have caught onto the fact that our collective issue with Rogan is that his views on COVID-19 vaccinations, medicinal therapies for COVID-19, etc are flat out wrong to the point where they are dangerous. If people were to heed what he says about it, we'd be in a great deal of trouble and shit's not going to get any better. That has jack shit to do with what "team" he "cheerleads" for. You would know that if you yourself weren't so transparently caught up in that bit of falderal, which is also very likely why you deliberately refuse to address those points that have been put to you multiple times on just this thread. Instead off addressing them, you resort to diverting everything to the make believe side of things, mostly via pretending to be a psychologist, and even on that, avoiding the burden of proof like a vampire avoids garlic. If you don't give us a reason to believe you, we have no reason to believe you, and not having a reason to believe you is the best reason not to believe you. So come back when you actually have something worthy of consideration. You've not added anything worthwhile, and until you do, we're moving on. Honestly I never used it, even well before I knew Rogan was on it. Had no need to.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
I only listen when I come across something that indicates that he said some crazy shit or one of his guests did. I listen to it, and invariably it turns out that he/they did. That’s not even my issue. My issue is that a lot of people such as yourself take this falderal seriously. You’re transparently projecting.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
And what I just told you is that you could strip all that away and it doesn’t detract one bit from the overarching point. Like I said, you’re not very good at this paying attention thing and now you’re grasping at straws to keep the hope for this puny little “gotcha” alive. It’s not working. 1. The word is “equivalence,” 2. My identity politics? That’s….cute.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
You’re really bad at this whole “paying attention” thing. No one here really gives a shit about his character. He could be a saint, and he could be the biggest piece of shit on this planet. Neither one of those excuses or changes the fact that he peddles misinformation/lies either directly or indirectly via his guests who spew bullshit while he just sits there like a bump on a log saying “hmmm interesting.” Whether that’s motivated by a shitty character or profit motive or identity politics or whatever really isn’t the point and I’m not about to let myself dabble in that pseudo-psychology falderal. What I judge him on is the output of his show, which contrary to what you believe, is not contestable. He peddles bullshit, and when he doesn’t, his guests peddle bullshit. People are free to make whatever comments about his character either way, but 1) it’s dishonest to assert baseless speculation as if it were a matter of fact 2) the aforementioned things are exactly what he does. So nice try at that little “gotcha.
-
2022-24 UIL Realignment
That's a nice little fairy tale that seems to run popular in these parts. How's that?
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Then it's beyond the scope for you to say that his behavior was "out of character."
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Do you know him personally?
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Ah yes the illegitimate election of the Kenyan born communist Muslim that worshipped at the altar of Saul Alinsky.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
“But he was talking tough and confidently!!! That’s why we believe him!!!”
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
And if anyone doubts this, just watch that bullshit genetic nonsense and juxtapose it with Sanjay Gupta. Tell me that he's handling both conversations the same way and you're a fucking liar.
-
(High School) Realignment talk not going away
Been over 20 years since we last played them. Looking forward to it.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
yeah Rogan’s not progressive. He’s not really anything. He’s, as suggested earlier, a sponge that can be talked into and out of anything.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Right and that’s really the overarching theme here: that a person so suggestible to provably false falderal has absolutely no business being in the kind of position he occupies.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Hell, they go batshit when anything gives that vague appearance. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve read/heard the phrase “freedom of speech” or “first amendment” in connection with fucking Neil Young. It’s absolute insanity. It basically goes like this. They don’t want Original Law or New Law. They want Diet Law: all the rights, none of the responsibilities.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Also, a quick Wikipedia search on the MAOA gene shows this. ”Several studies have found differences in the frequency distribution of variants of the MAOApromoter repeat between ethnic groups: 52-59% of African American men,[11][10] 48-62% of Chinese men,[12][10][13][14] 62% of Maori men,[9] 57% of Japanese men,[15] and 33-37% of European men[10][11] carried the 3R allele, while 5.5% of Black men, 0.1% of Caucasian men, and 0.00067% of Asian men carried the 2R allele." Ok so by this dumbass’ rationale, Chinese and Japanese men should be as or more violent than African Americans. Except… “However, a large genome-wide association study has failed to find any large or statistically significant effects of the MAOA gene on aggression.[47] A separate GWAS on antisocial personality disorder likewise did not report a significant effect of MAOA.[48] Another study, while finding effects from a candidate gene search, failed to find any evidence in a large GWAS.[46] A separate analysis of human and rat genome wide association studies, Mandelian randomization studies, and causal pathway analyses likewise failed to reveal robust evidence of MAOA in aggression.[49] This lack of replication is predicted from the known issues of candidate gene research, which can produce many substantial false positives.[50]” … ”The effects of MAOA genes on aggression have also been criticized for being heavily overstated.[56]Indeed, the MAOA gene, even in conjunction with childhood adversity, is known to have a very small effect.[57] The vast majority of people with the associated alleles have not committed any violent acts.[58][59]” So is this what that fuckwad would qualify as “doing your own research?” Just asking questions.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Exactly what I was thinking. Hell, just on a personal level, my ancestors who moved to Virginia from Scotland back in the late 1600’s did it to escape British violence and oppression. So they thought the “red savages” of North America were less violent than the English. But sure, whoever that moron guest of Rogan’s was; go ahead and believe in some make believe and pretend bullshit about Europeans being less violent because “farmers and stuff.”
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Oh and as far as the origins of Nickelback hate: Not an endorsement, just putting it out there
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Is it though?