I'm not sure where this obsession with me comes from, but I was responding to another poster's point that this thread was now an all encompassing thread about everything.
So, stop using 2019 statistics, it was the covid year and it's just shitty math. Also, your stats don't line up with OSU's federally mandated reporting. If you look at the most recent Clery report for OSU, they had 179 total sexual assaults. But you have to separate out Richard Strauss, which they are required to report, because that's a singular case and obviously not what you and I are talking here. So they actually had 134 cases, of which 100 occurred in the dorms, and 34 occurred on campus, 11 off campus, and 2 on OSU public property. The vast bulk of Rape occurred in OSU housing or in OSU campus buildings. If you account for fondling (again, after removing Strauss): Most of it was on campus, although they appear to have an issue with off campus touching. Texas' Clery numbers are much, much lower, as you pointed out.
This is a math way of saying: OSU has a Rape problem. A serious Rape problem and I wouldn't send my child there. But the math predicts, and I would argue in the statistics: that the vast number of assailants are OSU students attacking OSU students. Now, maybe OSU has strangers running rampant through their dorms, but that would mean they haven't adopted campus safety measures that have been pretty standard for decades. There hasn't been a serial rapist on the OSU campus since Billy Milligan, from what I can tell, in recent years.
Most schools spend a lot of time and money protecting their students from stranger assault: blue light phones, campus safety walk protocals, dorm key card security and check in desks. What a lot of schools do poorly is protecting their students from other students.
Of course it's dangerous to be a woman. Of course they fear for their safety. I at no point argued they didn't and shouldn't. What I have pointed out, repeatedly, is the most dangerous men they meet, are without question, the one's they know.