Jump to content

Bookman

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    3562
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bookman

  1. I think it's inevitable. I don't understand the Republican strategy of doing nothing. They should be playing defense and trying to find a compromise.
  2. When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.
  3. Has it even been determined that they are illegal? I just looked it up and the property appears to be in her name. https://esearch.sjcad.org/Property/View/91933. How many illegals buy real estate in their individual names?
  4. This fuckface simply isn't fit to be Governor of Texas.
  5. If you listen carefully, you can hear a scared kid say "I'm gonna die." Jesus.
  6. My general strategy is to play with people who are worse than I am.
  7. These are all consequences of America electing a failed businessman President of the United States.
  8. I have been saying this ever since Sandy Hook. I think it's inevitable at this point. The Republican strategy should be to minimize the effects, yet they aren't doing that at all.
  9. I'm not sure how many school shooters think they're going to get away with it.
  10. This will never work. They will figure out who the "marshalls" are quickly and just go shoot up a classroom with no marshalls. We need walls around our schools and at least three fully armed soldiers in every classroom. It's the only way to be sure.
  11. That depends. Is the name on your driver's license in all caps?
  12. Not to split hairs, but if it gets to the point that it's reckless or criminal negligence, then it's no longer an accident.
  13. It's not a crime to accidentally kill someone.
  14. Even if it's illegal, I'm pretty sure our honorable governor would give me a pardon.
  15. HOLY SHIT I live in a nice neighborhood and just now there is a Hispanic male in his 50's who appears to be looking for something in my front yard. Should I fucking blow him away with my shotgun?
  16. Yes and off the top of my head I would think that, had the jury made a factual finding that Fox had acted with malice, the U.S. Supreme Court would not be able to review the sufficiency of that determination. It's a moot point now with the settlement, but it would have been something Fox should have considered before going to trial.
  17. Happy to help. U.S. Supreme Court reviews of State Supreme Court decisions are rare but they happen.
  18. For the life of me, I can't understand why you think any of this is relevant.
  19. Thank you for letting me know I am free to research it. I am not sure how Fox could have a First Amendment claim based on the verdict until there’s actually been a verdict, but if so I’m pretty sure they can appeal that to the U.S. Supreme Court like NYT v. Sullivan. I don’t know if the U.S. Supreme Court would have any basis or jurisdiction to overturn a finding of malice though. Half of us are lawyers here so I was hoping someone knowledgeable would respond.
×
×
  • Create New...