Jump to content

ChuckNorrisActionJeans

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1514
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ChuckNorrisActionJeans

  1. Mission UK tonight at Elysium with Theater of Hate and Chameleons
  2. This is what you get with one-party rule. Absolute power corrupts absolutely... duh
  3. So now the lege will pay the settlement or what happens there??
  4. Why? Why leave this man in office to pursue vengeance and also risk having all the embarrassing Nate Paul stuff that must be coming out? Or will that all be swept under the rug by the feds??
  5. yep, and don't forget literally vowing revenge against his perceived political enemies, in a position which requires impartiality.
  6. yep, rules of evidence that aren't legally required for this have ruined the story line. Lame.
  7. Ah, good ol' Bill. Did he give you the special discount just for boys?
  8. Goebe is sustaining almost every one of their shit objections
  9. when they say crap like this, who exactly are they suggesting shooting?
  10. why does the defense have multiple attorneys examining witnesses and the prosecution is just...... Rusty. Fuck.
  11. how da fuck is anything concrete going to come in other than documents with Danny granting all these stupid hearsay objections? Rules of Civil or Criminal evidence should not apply to this proceeding and if the prosecution agreed to that, well shit.
  12. This Jeff guy sucks ass. Seems like the type to cry while masturbating.
  13. it's pretty nauseating to hear it laid out how deeply extremist all this state leadership is, and how they are so ensconced in that bubble as to not know any different
  14. it's pissing me off that his lawyer is allowed to editorialize in giving his not guilty pleas. Ok so Rusty just got him for it -- good.\ It was getting very close to saying "everything that [guy] just said is bullshit"
  15. the default should be shifted to who can rather than who cannot possess. The 2nd is vague and doesn't support the current SCOTus interp. Who can own, in terms of the need to actually own weapons that are more than recreational or self-defense, would be less fraught than excluding out groups who can't. Very radical view only to this country, I'm aware
  16. This will be obvious to some, but before the advent of the internet, previous generations often did not know how to put a name to the experience of gender dysphoria. It's generally a fairly small portion of the population who are trans and it just has not been widely understood or spoken of in most cultures, historically. Like with gay people but much more so. So once people finally have more widespread knowledge, you are going to have more people being able to identify themselves as trans, most who certainly have no motive other than accuracy, considering the still-extreme stigma. I say this from my family's personal experience. I wish the right-wingers would consider what the actual lived experience would be like of someone who came of age before the internet etc., and then after. To say it's all some sort of social contagion is myopic at best. This might be my most diplomatic post ever, so savor it my bitches.
  17. you must have a really weird definition of suffering if restrictions on certain deadly weapons qualifies as such
  18. yeah, on Inauguration Day, I didn't believe he'd come close to making it through his term in office. He shouldn't have.
  19. In further proof this is all a simulation, Ho's wife's email is ..... aho@gibsondunn.com. Noice. https://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyer/ho-allyson-n/
×
×
  • Create New...