there's definitely some overlap in the music business. to use a song to sell something or in a movie/tv show, you need permission and you need to pay someone to do it most likely. much like showbiz, things are constantly changing, and 1995 didn't look like 2005 in the music business. same with 2015 and i'm sure 2025. but at the same time, either musicians (or song owners) are compensated or they're not. they shouldn't be on one distribution stream but not the others. it should be comparable.
the other side for music, and why it's probably not a fair comp, is that plenty of musicians are ok with their songs being streamed for free, because that can build a band's following and they can make money selling songs/albums and on tour, merch, whatever. if patrick adams gets super popular right now because of the reemergence of suits, it's not like he's gonna sell out madison square garden with his one-man show.
i don't know much about how musicians/bands get paid out, but i would assume the more something gets streamed on spotify/pandora/watched on youtube, the more $ they get, right?