Jump to content

henrygandorf

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    19176
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    11

Everything posted by henrygandorf

  1. i was led to believe all of mar-a-lago was secure, so i guess i'm confused.
  2. since all 80+ witnesses are republicans, i think his political opponents must also be republicans. dude, the call is coming from inside the house.
  3. yeah, they said wed, thurs, or friday, and trump lawyers were like, we were thinking more like next monday or tuesday. i guess every day matters when delaying is the goal. reminded me of the old joke about the guy dating a pornstar trying to plan a date. she's like, "well, i'm working tuesday and wednesday, how about thursday?" and he's like, "yeah, how about monday?"
  4. we're dealing with a knucklehead who feels like everybody owes him from the start. if he helped make her a judge, even if he had no idea who she was, he will 100% feel like she owes him, her family owes him, and everybody she's ever passed on the street owes him. and much like a mob boss, one day, and that day may never come, he will ask a favor. this fuckstick still thinks the state of texas owes him because of how much money everybody "made" after hurricane harvey. even if she is completely objective and unbiased, he doesn't see things that way, and i'm sure this has been communicated to her in one way or another. either that, or she knows how he operates, and is preemptively doing whatever she needs to. the circular argument of "who actually is responsible for her getting this gig" goes out the window when you're dealing with trump, and the fact that so much time and energy has already been wasted on it is vintage surly.
  5. he's going to try this case on truth social and on cable news regardless. that's been the gameplan for weeks, same as the mueller report - tell the public what you want and assume (rightly so) that they won't take the time to read it. they want to avoid sharing documents in discovery that trump will simply turn around and bullhorn across social media. they think he'll do this because he's done exactly that a bunch of times. every time he's been indicted or about to be or had his place searched, he was the one who broke the story. so here's my question - what if he just lies about what he's being given? even under protective order, i would assume that only covers things that are actually in discovery. he's been lying about this case since the jump, so why stop now? "we were just sent boxes of discovery and it's plain as day, they are prosecuting me for speaking and violating my first amendment rights blah blah. we went through all their in-evidence and non-sources and no-conspirators and realized they have nothing on me because your favorite president trump (i refuse to capitalize the way he would) did nothing wrong! sad!" would that be a violation of the order, or is it only a violation if he reveals stuff actually in discovery? i think he's probably in the clear here. (a similar thing happened in "the insider" which you should probably rewatch)
  6. the electoral math is just not there for him. it was barely there in 2016 and took a minor miracle along with absolutely historically weird circumstances. things have gone way downhill for him since in a variety of ways, so no, he will not win the presidential election in 2024. if he somehow is president in 2025, it's because of a coup, and i don't really know what that looks like, because the states we need are "protected", but who the hell knows. it would literally have to be some succession shit where several of the voting places got blowed up or something. that said, once he loses in 2024, 2028 makes me nervous assuming trump is out of the way. if he's still in the way, i still feel very comfortable.
  7. also why do people want him to not be able to run anymore? i want him to run 3-5 more times.
  8. meyers was looking like the cf of the future before he got injured vs the cws (?) in the playoffs. not having him moving forward seemed like a blow at the time, so obviously he was contributing. the chas breakout was something i didn't see coming, but there's still a role for meyers as long as yordan is a part-time dh.
  9. tj friedl will forever haunt my dreams. pretty crazy matchup considering combined hr, sb, and k's. it's gonna come down to the wire on the division i think. i get derka this week.
  10. whatever happened to frankie montas? are they just in the business of ruining pitchers now?
  11. the audio is ahead of camera on my feed. he's calling strikes before i can see the guy swing. fuck yeah meyers. my kingdom for 8 functional hitters in a lineup. i'm not asking for that much.
  12. yeah, and he only had one homer. what is with you people? these 330' homers are exhausting.
  13. a lot of the talking points have shifted to "they're trying to stop him from running for president." can a person under indictment still run for president? yes. can a person in the middle of a federal trial still run for president? yes. can a person convicted of a felony still run for president? yes. shut. the. fuck. up.
  14. i got the nyy radio feed on sirius and they asked the same question.
  15. is bad = his numbers are bad. and his actual numbers (stats) are bad, which is why dusty thinks he can't hit lefties. the whole thing is stupid because even his shitass bad luck numbers vs lefties are similar to maldy's numbers against everybody.
  16. sonofabitch my own words used against me.
  17. i didn't say he can't hit lhp, i said his numbers are bad against lefties and we all know dusty will use that as an excuse. i also said he needs to play more against lefties because he needs a bigger sample and because a batter like him should hit lefties well. not sure why i got dragged into this.
  18. he's a senile old kook who doesn't know where he is half the time but the other half of the time he's a dark, evil, criminal mastermind and he's not supposed to be turning our stupid inside joke wink wink into his championship parade. pick a side, losers.
×
×
  • Create New...