Jump to content

Duane Moore

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    3618
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Duane Moore

  1. That is some Stalin-era Soviet propaganda right there. It’s a little scary how that guy can do a complete 180 in service of General Secretary Jimbo like that.
  2. [cough, cough] Vernon Broughton [cough, cough]
  3. They have always said KRob didn’t have good hands, so passes to him had to be dump offs in the flats. Supposedly (this is just what they’ve said) Blue can do damage running intermediate routes further down field.
  4. According to a couple of the IT guys, Blue has much better hands and is effectively a WR if you motion him out of the backfield. Otherwise, about the same running the ball.
  5. If the reports about using AED on the field are true, doesn’t that indicate he was still in a shockable rhythm and hadn’t progressed to asystole yet?
  6. Have we considered what it will do to the Aggie recruiting pitch if TCU wins next week and ATM can no longer claim to have the only “Sitting National Championship Coach” in the state of Texas?
  7. If they don’t reverse this call, just get rid of replay
  8. It’s gonna be a long nine months until the next season starts if every thread, no matter the subject, gets derailed on the “Is Sark the guy?” argument.
  9. If this isn’t true, I hope she gets a lawyer and sues the shit out of the Aggie that posted this. Putting her name out there is complete bullshit.
  10. Definitely agree with you on the second part. If we take care of our business on the field, TCU is not going to be an issue for us in recruiting even if they win next Monday. Part of my lack of hate for TCU stems from when I was in school. During the McWilliams era I saw a lot of bad football, and yet we never lost to TCU the whole time I was on the 40 Acres. It’s just hard for me to get worked up about them in the way I do about even U of H, who beat our ass 3 out of 4 years. I can understand and appreciate that things are different for you.
  11. For a lot of people this seems to come down to “there are a lot of annoying TCU/UGA fans in my life and I can’t bear to be around them if they win.” All politics is local as they say, and you have an insufferable brother in law or co-worker that’s a TCU fan, I don’t blame you one bit for pulling for UGA. My second order familial ties to TCU have been positive, as have been my trips on their campus and seeing games there against teams other than Texas. On the other hand, I’ve had UGA fans bark in my face, so I admit that colors my outlook on the game.
  12. Michigan can always fall back on the “screwed by the refs” rationalization.
  13. I tend to agree with this. Miami is another similar comp. Their history from WW2 - the Patterson era indicates otherwise, but they’ve definitely got a good sell on facilities, campus life, and a big city. I imagine their NIL program will at least be decent eventually. I think playing in the B12 hurts them as far as getting in on a lot of top shelf recruits. I just think that the outcome of the game next week on their recruiting profile will be marginal at best. That damage has already been done. They are now one of 7 programs to make the CFP final game, and only the 6th of the last 7 years. Win or lose next Monday, they can credibly make the argument to recruits that they are a big-time program who can compete for championships.
  14. Not sure how to feel about the whole Christian Jones staying another year thing. Good arguments on both sides. Am I a sheep if I put my trust in Kyle Flood to make the right call on this?
  15. If we can keep Whittington healthy for an entire season, maybe there’s hope for Catalon doing the same.
  16. TCU because college football needs to break out of the 4-5 team oligarchy that wins the CFP every year. I find the argument that winning the championship game (as opposed to making a great run and getting there) is going to make TCU a great recruiting power that will take all the players we want to be speculative at best. If that is the concern, it’s already too late.
  17. This looks like the Michigan - Ohio State game in reverse
  18. I think I mentioned that in another post. Yes, there’s a step up in competition but going to the SEC is also getting us access to recruits that want to play in that league that simply wouldn’t consider a B12 team. If he keeps stacking up top 5 classes like the last two, we will win a lot of games. Again, I I’m dubious about him beating other teams who have stacked top 5 classes like UGA and Bama, and he’ll likely get out coached when he plays good coaches with near comparable talent like LSU with Kelly or Tennessee with Heupel.
  19. Yep, same day we beat OU’s ass
  20. To be clear, I’m not “counting” on Sark regularly winning 10 games a year. As I said, that is my optimistic scenario for him if he accumulates enough talent, and that scenario is still on the table after this year. It’s not like I’ve bet the rent money on that happening, and I won’t be particularly surprised if it doesn’t. As I am not CDC, Jay Hartzell, Kevin Eltiffe, or a BMD, my opinion has exactly zero influence on how long Sark is the coach of Texas no matter how many scathing diatribes I post on a message board. Accordingly, I choose to take the optimistic view of his tenure for as long as possible. If you prefer to digitally rage at the heavens for the next 2+ years, that is certainly your right. You’ll have a lot of company on this thread.
  21. When we hired Sark, I was immediately disappointed. Then my fan powers of rationalization kicked in and I worked to come up with the rationale for being optimistic to get me through the next few years. What I came up with was that Sark has shown he can put together some formidable offenses when he has a talent advantage over everyone else like he did at Bama. I thought, “Texas is always able to recruit a talent advantage relative to the rest of the Big 12,” so if he is able to recruit reasonably well and hires a competent DC, we could win a lot of games with that formula, even if we would likely lose a majority when the talent was even with our opponents. Basically, the Mack Brown, Phillip Fulmer, Mark Richt formula of winning 9-10 games a year by getting the best Jimmies and Joes on campus. You do that long enough, and every once in a while you get lucky and break through. Two years in, I think that optimistic scenario is still on the table. Sark has recruited better than I had expected, and is building the team the right way, by stacking up blue chips on the lines and at QB. These are also the positions that take the longest to mature and develop, so we should all expect (and insist upon) improvement next year and 2024. Sark seems to have the disposition that will serve him well in the portal era, his players seem to like him, and his approach should attract and retain talent in a way that a Harry Hard-Ass like Tom Herman would not. We are stepping up in competition going to the SEC, but with that comes access to better athletes in recruiting who want to play in that league. I don’t have much hope of consistently beating teams like UGA and Bama at their current levels, or LSU or Florida if those programs get things rolling again. But a Texas program winning 10 games a season will almost always make a 12 team playoff field, even if we don’t advance beyond the first or second round very often. Maybe Arch or some generational player down the road comes in and takes us further. IDK. TLDR: last night didn’t crush all my hopes and dreams, which weren’t stratospheric to begin with.
  22. The more I think about last night, and the offensive approach going in to “throw the ball extensively” as Sark said in the post-game, last night seems like the transition game from Bijan/Roschon’s team to Quinn’s team. It seems clear Sark believes we aren’t going to be able to lean on the running game next year as our team’s identity, and that our future is as a QB-led passing offense. With that assumption, Sark thought we needed to start establishing this identity a game early because he knew there would be some growing pains and the result of this game didn’t mean anything in the grand scheme of things.
  23. Might be the time to educate the players on the harsh realities of a free market system and how it works both ways for buyers and sellers. If Worthy has any sense, he will keep quiet and hope whatever current deals he has roll over into next year.
  24. This was my biggest disappointment as well, and it apparently wasn’t a function of how the game was going and what wasn’t working, Sark said after the game that “the game plan was to throw the ball extensively.” (from the AP Recap) Let me say that I always expected a loss in this game, Washington is a very good team who was much more motivated about this game than us, and that matters so much in non-CFP bowl games. I never understood why we were favored, even by a little. That said, it surprised me that Sark had so little faith in Brooks to carry the load I expected 25-30 carries from him, and for us to try and grind them down like we did Baylor. Sark at times seems to call a game plan for the team he wants to have, rather than the team he actually has. On paper, maybe we matched up well in the passing game against UW’s defense. There were a lot of plays that seemed open that didn’t conn. But that’s not a new development this season, Ewers and his WR’s, particularly Worthy, have been an unreliable connection all season. Maybe Sark just recognized the exhibition nature of this game and took the long view that it was more important to get Ewers on track for next season than actually winning the game. With the recruiting class nearly done and the vast majority of it signed and locked in, he may be right about that. Bottom line, this loss sucked, but it really doesn’t mean anything. Next year will give us a much better idea of our long term trajectory under Sark.
  25. They’ll never expect Casey Cain!
×
×
  • Create New...