Jump to content

RomaVicta

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    14855
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by RomaVicta

  1. Or drag them out of the buildings and hang them from any convenient lampost or leftover gallows from Jan. 6? These guys seem like enemies of my country to me. The lives of real enemies are less than nothing to me. We're a banana republic, we will likely have to resort to banana republic means. Where does the Army stand? Is the Constitution being attacked? Should the Army move to defend it. Where's the American Ataturk?
  2. What do you expect from a political party operating through an established political system when confronted with someone who won't play by the rules? Compound that with the complicity of the opposing "political party" that backs every anti-democratic move. Let's all sit down and have a policy debate! May the best idea or compromise win! This is a ruthless power grab carried out in plane sight and this electorate cannot even manage to fill the streets with protest. No national strike. Likely little discussion among the common voters and acquiescents. This keeps rolling until it hits the point that the above begins to happen. I have no idea when or if that moment will come. Hell, a large majority of pundits, panels, and smart people still don't get it. In the stadium, some people are playing and watching football. Outside the stadium, the world changes. Back inside the statdium, they think a better playcaller will impact what's outside. Paradigm shift. Or maybe I'm an idiot. Or maybe both.
  3. I called RC. He says he didn't offer.
  4. Does an angry mob righteously defending democracy and pillaging the home of traitors qualify? Used to. Musk busting down the door at Treasury or USAID might qualify under the being loud at a secure government operation law or maybe misdemeanor damge to property. Elon's is shaking in his boots, I'm sure. The United States of Impotence and Ignorance
  5. Irrelevant to my point and what you quote. You're addressing my quote as if I stated a high standard was the norm. I invoked a molecule of it as hyperbole, but it's really not terribly hyperbolic considering the shitstain calling the shots and making appointments at the preseent time. You're point suggests that some liar in the past qualifies Gabbert. That's way below your standard. Frankly, the name-calling is beneath your standard, as well. That said, your usual standard of decorum is higher than those addressing you. Maybe you're fed up. Written respectfully.
  6. Any appointee of Trump deserves suspicion at the very least because his every nominee is primarily chosen to be a stooge. Some stooges are relatively qualified if the reference points are RFK Jr. and Hegspeth. They're merely dangerously incompetent or crazy. Take a look at Patel, and you have a candidate who is not qualified to run the FBI but dangerously competent to abuse it. Gabbard? She's probably better than those guys. I don't need to see her testimony to know she has neither the experience or any proven qualities to be considered for DNI in any administration operating with even a molecule of good faith. The big picture of the assembly of this administration is pretty much all the evidence you need to reject these nominess out of hand should you be one of the minority in this country that care about or even have a mild understanding of the republic. When the overall theme is dishonesty, corruption, and abuse of power, why quibble on the choice of minions?
  7. Remember what the Dotard said about future elections? Oops. Fumbled his last-ever vote.
  8. Hasn't he seen the current 2026 rankings?!? Besides Oregon, only two of those other schools are in the top 20! The writing is on the wall. Sleeping giants! Everything being cyclical! Elk time in the Station! Get aboard young man while you still can!
  9. Wow. Haven't thought of this in decades. Heard it my freshman year at Texas. Bravo!
  10. I can't believe that it's only now occuring to me that his followers have actually found a way to make a virtue of dishonesty.
  11. They'll call them WMDs (Weaponized Mexican Drones) to further inflame the cult and acquiescent. Then we'll get into the business of blowing up Mexican weddings and family reunions just like we've done in Afghanistan, Iraq, and anywhere else the USAF can strike a gathering of dark people. Here come the planes. They're American planes made in America.
  12. I'm sure we can find a law that he's maybe breaking to dither over for several years while the point becomes moot. Maybe we can use the ol' interfering with a government process or loitering or something. This is like using the courts to cure cancer.
  13. Thanks @Willfully Horn I can only browse this now as I'm still trying to maintain complacency to ward off the anxiety of (political) impotence. I will give this the attention it deserves soon. Bernie speaks out in an honest way about the obvious which will likely be completely ignored or marginalized by the self-neutering legitimate press of America. Trump is moving like Saddam in Iraq and other tyrants of the last century. It's astonishing to observe the speed. Such is the look of handing over your government to an enemy of your republic. Thank you for the new word. If the US is being devoured by the coprophagous, what does that make this country? To see what we're up against, visit TexAgs Politics. I did for half an hour this morning. In this way, this only way, have the Aggies found their way to the mainstream. It's a journey into the formidably idiotic and unjustifiably certain viewpoint that elected the Shit-eater-in Chief.
  14. That's why we're not getting out of this. We're not the Founding Fathers or the Valley Forge type. We're mostly fat and happy and oblivious without enough understanding of how the republic was designed to be bothered to take action so long as the programs stream and advertising tells us what's important. It may be a good thing that the major news outlets be forced to use their legs to get stories rather than sitting around on their asses getting competing quotes. Remember how their panels and editorial pages didn't talk much about Christian Nationalism (ooie ooie, religion!) or speak precisely about the scumbag that got re-elected? We did get a lot of man-on-street from Iowa, though. That was pretty cool. The Brit responses to the helicopter drivel posted above were excellent. This just made me laugh: Part of me hates them for Ireland and their hypocrisy over the slave trade fortunes their aristocracy gathered but not nearly all of me.
  15. Why would anyone want to do that? The issue is constipation.
  16. Bob Marley wrote a nice song about her.
  17. Oh, William, absolutely no person in America outside of TexAgs is comparing Manning to fucking Marcel Reed let alone Longhorns doing it. I think William is trying to regain his Aggie purity rating by huffing some farts from his readership: Of course. That's why we ran the wishbone and never threw passes when Manning was in for Ewers. This "evidence" is employed only on TexAgs. I think we should have considered throwing when he was in on red zone plays. I also think we (and so many other coaches in football) should not feel that they have to line up the biggest guys on the team for a futile rush at the middle. It has nothing to do with trust. It's a mindset contagion that the CDC needs to look into. First quoted post: Like one of those hard, spherical turds during times of dehydration and hydrocodone, this post contains a density of TexAgs density. It doesn't stop the parrots from lining up to repeat parts of it as though it's revelatory. The last part is the Aggie answer for all good QBs: we need to pressure him and hit him! Also presented as though nobody else has ever thought it. Then they get the confirming comfort of William's fight hardened hands.
  18. Nothing screams meritocracy more than Donald Trump!
  19. Yea. I heard "tower" and assumed the word referred to the derrick. After a few months, I saw a schedule that made it clear. I opted not to correct anyone on this.
×
×
  • Create New...