Jump to content

Horn of Gabriel

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1315
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Horn of Gabriel

  1. Is Anthony Hill playing today?
  2. K. Woods is the best looking guy I haven't heard much about on the team, impressed w/ how he's moving.
  3. Has anyone done the pre-spring game team fire sale? Do they have anything good or is just clearance rack shit?
  4. Probably safer to assume that they both can't and won't try either. Let's call it the Maginot Line strategy.
  5. Interesting article from Capt. Joshua Taylor on countering China's illegal activities in the SCS through a persistent low-end presence vs. the high end FONOPs we run today. Smart, less costly, and less escalatory. https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2022/august/campaign-plan-south-china-sea
  6. Maybe marginally. 4-5* recruits care about 1 thing above all else: "what is going to put me in the best position for the NFL?" The SEC and B1G are both doing great in that regard and will continue to pull away from the pack. If FSU shows up looking for an OL and can give quick playing time and a demonstrated NFL-path whereas the SEC offers that recruit is getting don't, the sunshine vs. snow argument won't be a major factor. Still a bit but not as much. I think the "ease of recruiting FL factor" in realignment is being overblown. Good SEC teams are going to get talent no matter what. Money will be the main and most important driver for realignment, unless you're the braindead PAC in which case "academic snobbery" is also a factor apparently.
  7. Sure, FSU is easier to recruit against when it's "not SEC" but you can't treat that question in a vacuum. Because the question going forward is not "will they be SEC or not?" it's "Will they be SEC or B1G?" I don't know how much easier FSU will be to recruit against if they were B1G...
  8. This. Kobe and Jordan are the only ones (maybe Tiger in golf) who cared about nothing, NOTHING except beating everyone else and being the alpha, and combined the God-given talent with the work ethic and drive to back it up. Durant may have the first two but as long as he's jacking off on twitter he'll never get there. Jordan and Kobe would never have been on twitter in their primes. Too busy making up the next perceived slight to provide motivation to destroy.
  9. The 12-team setup creates a situation where there's no enticement for ND to join a conference, ever. UNTIL the B1G and SEC start to become AFC/NFC and schedule each other nearly exclusively, then ND will find it hard to get enough top level games. That might do it, or a revenue difference compelling enough that they need to join to stay competitive for coaches or paying players from TV money, which make no mistake will happen in the next 20 years.
  10. I had to do this for a project car recently. There's no penalty fees, you do have to sign an affidavit that you didn't drive it, and that you haven't received any tickets for lack of registration. The major PITA is that you can't do it online (or at least couldn't do it online when I did it for WilCo), you had to go into the Tax Assessor/Collector office and do it in person, which means burning a few hours sitting on your ass. At least now mine does online appointments to cut down on the wait. You'll want to bring your title. They may not need it but good to have it.
  11. OK but even assuming that's true and yes as noted above there is plenty of "creative" accounting in many AD's to show breakeven or a loss every year...promotion/relegation only works if everyone agrees to do it. It's pretty obvious why SMU, UTSA, or UH would sign up for that. What motivation does Georgia, Texas, Ohio State or Bama have to sign up for a system where they could get relegated? I can't think of any.
  12. It's fun to think about but also completely unworkable for college football. Most athletic departments outside the top 20 are breakeven at best and many actually require subsidy from the university to be solvent. Texas is far outside the norm here with the revenue we throw out of the AD. Since football is the #1 revenue generator, if a more marginal school was relegated, their revenues would tank even further. Imagine being an Iowa State or an Arizona St., or Purdue or Ole Miss and you string together a few bad years and relegate down one or two levels. All of the sudden your conference schedule is what we know today as MAC, Sunbelt, and AAC teams at best. Your TV revenues tank, your gate tanks, and now your whole AD is insolvent. You have to cut a ton of headcount out of the AD and, probably, cut a bunch of other sports too. Especially women's sports, and now you have a Title IX issue. It's a death spiral. In european soccer a rich owner plugs that gap and invests to move up. In CFB, the "owens" are the donors, much more fickle. Also worth pointing out: in this system how far down would Texas have relegated from 2010-now? 2 levels? 3? Interesting to think about
  13. WSJ: Lab Leak Most Likely Origin of Covid-19 Pandemic, Energy Department Now Says https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-origin-china-lab-leak-807b7b0a?mod=hp_lead_pos1
  14. Purple alternative Texas uniforms confirmed!!!!!
  15. We'll see if UW and UO sign any meaningful GOR. Doubtful.
  16. Now imagine Deion was a white coach saying that
  17. Not really, as more and more good teams get pulled into the major 2 conferences, there's fewer reasons for non-conf games. Go to 10 noncon, 3-4 permanent and 6-7 rotating. Blah blah NFL-lite, etc
  18. This is interesting; source on the Amazon 15-year GOR request?
  19. That would be the ultimate FU, would love to see Yomark hand us the trophy as we put a foot out the door.
  20. Couple of possibilities, in my ranked order of likelihood: They thought this would be like their prior balloon overflights and not be regarded as a big deal, but the media picked up on it and it blew up in their face The left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing because China is so big and bureaucratic, and while they underestimated the shitstorm, they weren't intentionally trying to fuck up the summit it was just a side-effect ... ... There's a shadowy cabal within the Chinese government that wants to sabotage any sort of bilateral relationship with the US and planned a balloon overflight of our airspace timed to Blinken's visit to disrupt it
  21. I'll admit I've been pleasantly surprised with the EU, especially Germany over the past year. However, let's also be realistic - we've been lucky. First, they've had a mild winter which reduced their gas consumption. Second, because LNG is a commodity we've been able to backfill Russian supplies to some extent and that ability is growing as the EU builds new LNG import facilities for US gas. Third, the Ukraine war is in the EU's backyard. None of those conditions exist for a faraway war between China and Taiwan/US. I think it's much more likely that Germany and the EU spearheads a strongly worded letter to China saying "No, really, stop!" and maybe some weak sanctions that they later back off on when they feel the pinch. Especially if they're already feeling a pinch from rising energy costs due to the Russian sanctions.
  22. Maybe in the long term. In the short term they are precariously close to being able to take the island and then figure they're too big to fail and will deal w/ the repercussions down the road. The world depends on Chinese manufacturing and supply chains way more than Russia; it was realatively easy to remove Russia from the global economy but it will do as major damage to the US if we shut down all trade with China also. Go through your house and see how much shit is made in China. It's everywhere and changing those supply chains to India or reshoring them to the US is a decade-long thing, not a flip the switch. In the meantime, voters are going to punish the party in power when they see a 40%+ price increase on daily goods to account for that re-shoring, as well as shortages. Also don't count on the EU for shit. They'll buckle. Agree, again, long term. China has a window for about 7-10 years now before they hit the rough patch there, and they have some homeport military advantages, AND the US population isn't bought into the need for the war. That could be enough to nudge Xi into action.
  23. You're correct, however China is rapidly closing this gap. They've recently been actively training for beach landings and deployment using roll-on/roll-off (RO-RO) ships. To your point, 100 miles is a lot and those waters will be contested. But China knows that, and they're dealing with that too. Specifically they've massively expanded their land based offensive ballistic and cruise missile capabilities for both anti-ship and land attack. From the link: Now you might say our anti-satellite, EW, jamming, and cyber capabilities make that issue moot and break the kill chain. You willing to bet 10,000+ sailors' lives on that? I don't think Biden or the Navy will be, and for that reason the SCS and Taiwan straight will be relegated to subs only and our carrier strike groups will be held at standoff range beyond the first island chain. We'll need 3-4 of them minimum and all the associated logistics that go along with that. At the same time, Guam and Okinawa will also be saturated by those missiles. We don't have enough anti-cruise and anti-ballistic missile defense to make up for the sheer numbers that China can throw out today, let alone tomorrow. If China gets serious, Guam and our other major Pacific bases will get cratered. This is why our recent news with the Philippines to open new and reopen old bases there is critically important to spread our assets. We can't keep all our planes hot seated, fueled and ready to take off on a moment's notice 24/7, so the AF is going to lose a shit ton on the ground. A recent wargame found that ~90% of the AF's ~300 planes lost were destroyed on the ground. We also tended to lose around 2 aircraft carriers and about a dozen ships in total. That sounds unfathomable, unthinkable. Our USAF and USN are too good right? I'm sure the French had similar thoughts about the Maginot line. OTOH, China has issues too. First they lack experience in amphibious landings, and that's really hard. We paid for our learnings up to Normandy in blood. The PLAN, PLAF, PLARF, and PLA haven't demonstrated combined warfare (yet). Their top-down culture is risk averse. Pros for China: Homecourt advantage Nationalistic fervor Easier supply chains Asymmetric advantages in missiles, potentially cyber Quiet diesel subs good for cross-straight and near costal fights AA/AD in SCS Enough nukes to hold us to MAD Cons for China: Technology disadvantage vs. US/allies Economic considerations of fighting one of their top 2 trading partners (this goes both ways) Lack of experience in amphibious landings Taiwan's geography works against them once they land (few viable beaches/ports to land at, lots of mountains and choke points make it defensible inland) Time - the longer it takes the worse for China once things go hot Pros for US: Overall much stronger military, better training and more professional Technology advantage in stealth, standoff weapons, anti-missile defense (although #'s limited), anti-sub warfare, space, and others Blue water Navy Cons for US: Military is currently spread around the world US population isn't bought into the need to defend Taiwan or spend our lives on another war in Asia Could go nuclear Long supply chains make sustainment really hard Relatively low supplies of anti-ship standoff range missiles like LRASM, which forces the USN to either put subs or carrier groups at risk Unlike Ukraine, Taiwan cannot realistically be resupplied once the conflict starts because we cannot guarantee air superiority due to mainland China's missile reach and proximity Limited basing options in AsiaPac make juicy targets for Chinese missiles + our antimissile defense is nowhere near enough to deal with their #'s If you really want to geek on this stuff, read the output of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) unclassified wargame "The First Battle of the Next War - Wargaming a Chinese Invasion of Taiwan" released in January 2023. It's a sobering look at what we face. The bottom line: in most scenarios Taiwan is able to sustain as an independent democracy. The bad news: we lose a lot of lives and materials and our military is severely degraded for years to come (as is China's).
×
×
  • Create New...