Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’d be interested in a drop comparisons between those two as well. I suspect Sayin’s receivers comprehend their job description (and position title) better. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)

What run support is Sayin getting that Arch is not both from his OC calling for runs and the actual performance of the running backs? Ohio State averages 161.8 yards per game running the ball. They have 9 more rushing TDs than us. 

Edited by mdmost
Posted
33 minutes ago, tbone_ said:

I’d be interested in a drop comparisons between those two as well. I suspect Sayin’s receivers comprehend their job description (and position title) better. 

Sark said Wingo could be just as good as smith or Ryan Williams.  

  • Haha 2
Posted
32 minutes ago, mdmost said:

What run support is Sayin getting that Arch is not both from his OC calling for runs and the actual performance of the running backs? Ohio State averages 161.8 yards per game running the ball. They have 9 more rushing TDs than us. 

Arkansas gives up 180 a game.  We better go for 200

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, Im_smarter_then_you said:

Arkansas gives up 180 a game.  We better go for 200

We should but we won't. If Tre gets positive yards on his first couple of runs then maybe we run it more. If he gets stuffed early, Sark will Sark the game plan like he did last week in the 2nd half and we'll get pass happy. 

Posted
1 hour ago, mdmost said:

We should but we won't. If Tre gets positive yards on his first couple of runs then maybe we run it more. If he gets stuffed early, Sark will Sark the game plan like he did last week in the 2nd half and we'll get pass happy. 

Wisner was averaging like 6 yards a carry in the first two series and we still went to pass only for some reason. 

Posted
Just now, Biff Tannen said:

Wisner was averaging like 6 yards a carry in the first two series and we still went to pass only for some reason. 

Maybe I misheard but Sark said he was trying to run Tre when it was 14-10 who got stuffed for a loss of 8 and then we didn't get the ball back until we were down big and the game called for throws. 

Posted
38 minutes ago, mdmost said:

Maybe I misheard but Sark said he was trying to run Tre when it was 14-10 who got stuffed for a loss of 8 and then we didn't get the ball back until we were down big and the game called for throws. 

Sarkisian is full of shit. We made no serious effort to run the ball last week. Fucking joke. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, mdmost said:

We should but we won't. If Tre gets positive yards on his first couple of runs then maybe we run it more. If he gets stuffed early, Sark will Sark the game plan like he did last week in the 2nd half and we'll get pass happy. 

I wish I thought you were correct, and I would love to see it. However, we were successful in the early against Georgia and then apparently forgot rushing plays were even an option.

If we end up getting a long TD run in the first quarter Sark will view the RB obligations as complete for the game.

Edited by BurntEyes
Posted
4 hours ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:

Don’t get triggered sarkolytes but another complimentary post about Arch

 

 

 

 

 

image.thumb.png.43fdf3ff235a26e0765184dcb41fcca4.png

 

Julian Sayin is passing at 80.14% on the season with only 4 turnovers and less attempts. Arch is playing fine but come on. 

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

Julian Sayin is passing at 80.14% on the season with only 4 turnovers and less attempts. Arch is playing fine but come on. 

Julian Sayin has an OL, RB with actual carries and WRs and TEs who actually catch the ball. All that in addition to an OC with a clue, come on.

Edited by BurntEyes
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Ricky Butler said:

I think the answer to the question is that Arch is royalty and will get the benefit of the doubt in every football situation for the rest of his life. Heavy is the head…

No, the answer to that is despite playing for the worst offense in college football Arch is performing on par with the best as a QB and individual contributor.

The inability to recognize how amazing this is, is not at all surprising coming from this crowd.

Edited by BurntEyes
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

Julian Sayin has an OL, RB with actual carries and WRs and TEs who actually catch the ball. All that in addition to an OC with a clue, come on.

No argument but the Heisman is about results. Right now ole buddy is head and shoulders. That's no slight on Arch. Just showing how good he is playing right now. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

No argument but the Heisman is about results. Right now ole buddy is head and shoulders. That's no slight on Arch. Just showing how good he is playing right now. 

That tweet or post was more pointing out the insanity of bashing Arch when his numbers are very comparable to Sayin. Not supporting he should be a candidate.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
32 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

No, the answer to that is despite playing for the worst offense in college football Arch is performing on par with the best as a QB and individual contributor.

The inability to recognize how amazing this is, is not at all surprising coming from this crowd.

The point is that because he’s a Manning, he’ll always be under more scrutiny. But you’re on a roll this week so make whatever point you want despite what I wrote. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Ricky Butler said:

The point is that because he’s a Manning, he’ll always be under more scrutiny. But you’re on a roll this week so make whatever point you want despite what I wrote. 

I think the answer to the question is that Arch is royalty and will get the benefit of the doubt in every football situation for the rest of his life

Well, you were very obtuse in making that point. 

Posted
54 minutes ago, Ricky Butler said:

I think the answer to the question is that Arch is royalty and will get the benefit of the doubt in every football situation for the rest of his life. Heavy is the head…

Not sure about that.  We’ve dogged the shit out of him. Everyone has

Posted
14 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

That tweet or post was more pointing out the insanity of bashing Arch when his numbers are very comparable to Sayin. Not supporting he should be a candidate.

Dude- There is nothing wrong with Arch's numbers, but Sayin is almost 20 completion points better with more yards and less attempts. That's crazy. The best completion percentage in the history of college football is Shedeur Sanders at 71.8%, and Sayin is 9% better that. Historically good. Let's acknowledge how great dude is playing. 

Posted
52 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

No, the answer to that is despite playing for the worst offense in college football Arch is performing on par with the best as a QB and individual contributor.

The inability to recognize how amazing this is, is not at all surprising coming from this crowd.

Arch played like crap for quite a few games but he’s obviously figured something out.  Hes pretty good.  As good as sayin?  Idk. Sayin don’t get to play with guys like Moore and wisner

  • Haha 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

Dude- There is nothing wrong with Arch's numbers, but Sayin is almost 20 completion points better with more yards and less attempts. That's crazy. The best completion percentage in the history of college football is Shedeur Sanders at 71.8%, and Sayin is 9% better that. Historically good. Let's acknowledge how great dude is playing. 

Jesus dude, I'm not questioning Sayin.

Dunno why I bother with this thread.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...