Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, BurntOrange&White said:

We have that already. If you take a WR, which I doubt we do, then it needs to be a Coleman or Marsh type 

You're right, we do have those things - but we don't have anyone who can do those things that's 6'5". I believe he was also kind of new to FB out of HS and I kind of question the level of coaching he's been getting. But you're probably right - I'm guessing he'd be prohibitively expensive even if we were interested

 

edit: and I agree. If we go after anyone, it should be Coleman

Edited by campcrunk
Posted
1 minute ago, BurntOrange&White said:

We're returning our top 4 receivers and have a ton invested into guys we didn't play.

Funds can be rearranged and people can walk if we find the right guy. We’ll see. I agree it will be a stud or nothing.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

OT
IOL x2
C
RB
TE
WR x2

Realistically this is what we need on offense. Will be Arch’s last year - load up and fuck the cost.

On Defense I’d take:
DE
LB
S
CB

Again - “we pay to win the game.”

Herm

Posted
7 hours ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Meh. Great athlete but not a great receiver 

He should've been an Edge rusher that's the position where he had the highest ceiling. Maybe he didn't want to bulk up and mess up his track speed though.

Posted
2 hours ago, BurntOrange&White said:

OL(3 guys, pray 2 of them are quality starters)
RB
TE(If Endries doesn't come back)
LB
CB
S
K
P

Endries walked at Senior Day. Whatever that’s worth 

Posted

There is a large chasm between the Cam Coleman/Ryan Williams supertalents/super expensives and the lower profile guys who will fit into the culture while providing a trait/skill that the team needs at WR or any other position really. We gotta go find more of those and pick our spots on the super talents we go after.

Can't rely on developing these unproven guys. Let them prove themselves while you work to raise the floor of the team.

Posted (edited)

The problem isn't the top 1 or 2 wr recruits every year who are studs the minute they step foot on campus.  Its 3-10.  That's where you still tie up a lot of money, but they need time to develop or are straight up busts.

Edited by kevwun
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Is Deandre Moore leaving after this year?

I like Livingston and Mosley. Wingo is just a good athlete that’s about it. I doubt sark ever benches him

I think if we go in the portal for a WR the young kids are leaving. Of course we don’t know if they are any good since sark refused to play them.

Posted
12 hours ago, Handcruser said:

OT
IOL x2
C
RB
TE
WR x2

Realistically this is what we need on offense. Will be Arch’s last year - load up and fuck the cost.

On Defense I’d take:
DE
LB
S
CB

Again - “we pay to win the game.”

Herm

I’d be ok sticking with Goosby and Baker at tackle (assuming both return). Funds are finite and they were both playing pretty well by year end.

I think we’re ok at Edge, absent a situational player like Spence being available. I liked what I saw from Phillips, Littleton and Black at corner, although depth would be nice.

G-C-G is an absolute must, to state the obvious. Safety, RB and WR (assuming the freshman leave or aren’t ready) as well. 

Posted
13 hours ago, Handcruser said:

OT
IOL x2
C
RB
TE
WR x2

Realistically this is what we need on offense. Will be Arch’s last year - load up and fuck the cost.

On Defense I’d take:
DE
LB
S
CB

Again - “we pay to win the game.”

Herm

We aren't getting 4 O-linemen in the portal. That's absurd. 

Posted

In terms of OL, the first question is do the coaches think Cruz and Kibble will be ready to contribute next year.

 

The second question is, since these coaches were dumb enough to think Stroh was a D1 player, is there any chance they are going to get any of this right.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Yesh said:

In terms of OL, the first question is do the coaches think Cruz and Kibble will be ready to contribute next year.

 

The second question is, since these coaches were dumb enough to think Stroh was a D1 player, is there any chance they are going to get any of this right.

The other question is should Flood's judgement as to OL still be trusted. He is same guy that trotted Stroh out for multiple games to start season

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Why is he guaranteed that? He's not good. 

Because experience is invaluable? Particularly if the player has said experience at multiple spots along the line? Idk, call me skeptical if you think we'll have 2 portal/in house Gs that are better, and Cruz sets the world on fire with no injuries.

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, BigHorn'13 said:

Because experience is invaluable? Particularly if the player has said experience at multiple spots along the line? Idk, call me skeptical if you think we'll have 2 portal/in house Gs that are better, and Cruz sets the world on fire with no injuries.

That's cool, his experience doesn't mean shit if he isn't good. You can go get someone with similar or more experience from the portal that is a better player. Your reasoning right now is exactly how the fuck we ended up with our situation this year.

Edited by BurntOrange&White

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...