Jump to content

Brian Fantana

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    9366
  • Joined

Everything posted by Brian Fantana

  1. See this is what I'm talking about. That doesn't make any sense. You can't code a satellite transceiver into existence and there is no way to hide that kind of communication.
  2. There is no publicly available proof, but a 60% uranium enrichment level is far above what is necessary for civilian nuclear power. It's below the enrichment level of modern warheads but is sufficient to create fission bombs. There is no reason to have a stockpile of HEU other than to create weapons. This doesn't mean they currently have the capability but they could do it with the material on hand.
  3. I just need to see some harder evidence than this. This is nothing but vague conjecture and a jumble of tech words that don't necessarily make much sense.
  4. @SydneyCarton to be clear, what I was saying was that it was ironic because Israel literally does that, not that Iran (under its current governance) wouldn't do it.
  5. Would you like me to quote the multiple times I have stated that the current government of Iran needs to be removed, or would you like to actually read the thread yourself instead of forming a tapioca-brained opinion based on one single post you are misinterpreting?
  6. This reads like a bad movie version of how someone thinks tech works. I'm not saying it isn't possible, but yeah.
  7. No but it really makes it feel like time is a circle.
  8. Lol we're gonna give Iran back to the monarchy aren't we
  9. There is some level of irony in discussing using nukes as a shield to do terrorism when discussing Israel specifically.
  10. 100% This is their real strategic rival.
  11. Dang you got him good
  12. Chad Steve Ballmer vs. Virgin Jeff Bezos
  13. Yes, you're right, it's worse now. If you think we're funneling money and weapons to Israel and sending strategic bombers over there to spread democracy you're kidding yourself. It's the exact same delusion that the powers that be counted on vis a vis Iraq. A government amenable to us plundering their natural resources (and keeping them from flowing into China) is the only acceptable option. And we aren't the only interested parties, the Saudis are very interested in this as well.
  14. Right, my point was they have had this before and we decided to destroy it because they dared to nationalize their own oil industry and refused to capitulate to Western (mostly British at the time) oil interests. We will never allow them to have a democratic government because they will want to maintain control of their own interests.
  15. On one hand I understand being hawkish against the current regime and I definitely agree they need to go, but it's always amusing to me how no one wants to look back and consider why Iran is the way it is now and how that should factor in to how this goes. It doesn't seem to be that bombing the shit out of this country and then installing whatever puppet government we choose is going to ultimately lead to a better outcome than what we have today. Seems like a lot of selfish, short term interest is driving a lot of this.
  16. Tbh, dissolving every Likud party member in acid would probably be a net positive for the world. e: Similar to the mullahs
  17. Yeah I know they exist but I've legit had like a dozen women tell me the exact same thing. It's a little different if the girl is "tall" (5'9"+). I'm not saying short kings don't run into this, but if you're average height as a dude or taller, you're not gonna have issues 9 times out of 10 as long as you're confident.
×
×
  • Create New...